15.11.2013 Views

Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR

Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR

Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

■■<br />

■■<br />

Showed pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> having lived in the house for <strong>at</strong><br />

least three years<br />

Would contribute labor and use m<strong>at</strong>erials<br />

according to instructions from the technical and<br />

social staff overseeing the works<br />

4.5 Agreements on Loc<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

Moving and Housing Models<br />

With respect to loc<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the new house and housing<br />

model, each beneficiary had to agree (in writing) th<strong>at</strong><br />

the reloc<strong>at</strong>ion would not impair his/her livelihood or<br />

social networks, since the new lot was not far from the<br />

original loc<strong>at</strong>ion. By signing, beneficiaries also accepted<br />

the housing model, degree <strong>of</strong> urban development, and<br />

the assisted self-construction system.<br />

4.6 Characteristics and Costs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

New Houses<br />

The housing models were designed by the Provincial<br />

Emergency Coordin<strong>at</strong>ion Sub-units (SUPCE), and tailored<br />

to the local characteristics and culture (to preserve<br />

diversity) while considering each locality’s physical and<br />

financial resources. All this was conducted under the<br />

supervision and subject to the approval <strong>of</strong> the Central<br />

Emergency Coordin<strong>at</strong>ion Sub-Unit (SUCCE). Figure<br />

3.3 is a drawing <strong>of</strong> a house in one <strong>of</strong> the provinces.<br />

The houses differed from one province to another, and<br />

preference was given to traditional systems which allowed<br />

for simple finishings and l<strong>at</strong>er expansion. At the<br />

start <strong>of</strong> the program, each house cost US$6,200; this<br />

figure did not include the value <strong>of</strong> the land, the urban<br />

infrastructure supplied by the province or municipality,<br />

or the labor input <strong>of</strong> the beneficiaries.<br />

The housing designs were flexible, while complying with<br />

the following requirements:<br />

■■<br />

Maximum cost: US$6,200<br />

■■<br />

Minimum surface area: 42 m<br />

2<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

Loc<strong>at</strong>ed in a safe area<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> traditional m<strong>at</strong>erials from local suppliers<br />

Acceptable standards <strong>of</strong> durability and quality <strong>of</strong><br />

life fe<strong>at</strong>ures<br />

Simple construction techniques<br />

The families had five different types <strong>of</strong> house designs to<br />

choose from and their proposals were also incorpor<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

into the designs. For example, the houses included porches,<br />

fences and fireplaces, all <strong>of</strong> which are typical elements <strong>of</strong> this<br />

coastal area’s culture. They are part <strong>of</strong> our cultural wealth.<br />

Mr. Víctor Debloc, Commune President <strong>of</strong> Romang, Santa Fe<br />

Figure 3.3. Drawings <strong>of</strong> a House<br />

Chapter 3 Response to Recurrent Floods: Assisted Self-Construction Housing Program | Argentina | 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!