Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR
Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR
Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 1<br />
Global and L<strong>at</strong>in America and the<br />
Caribbean N<strong>at</strong>ural <strong>Disaster</strong> Trends<br />
By Haris Sanahuja<br />
<strong>Disaster</strong>s are the result <strong>of</strong> the overlapping in time<br />
and space, <strong>of</strong> a n<strong>at</strong>ural phenomenon <strong>of</strong> certain<br />
intensity —th<strong>at</strong> is, a hazard—with a popul<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
exposed to its impact. A n<strong>at</strong>ural phenomenon cannot be<br />
considered a hazard unless it is analyzed in a socioeconomic<br />
context where its occurrence can affect society.<br />
This context also influences the level <strong>of</strong> susceptibility to<br />
damage—th<strong>at</strong> is, vulnerability—to a particular hazard.<br />
When a hazard affects two areas with different socioeconomic<br />
and environmental contexts, the level <strong>of</strong> damage<br />
depends on these differences.<br />
The Caribbean region, with its diverse island st<strong>at</strong>es and<br />
annual tropical storms, <strong>of</strong>fers a useful area in which to<br />
analyze the effects <strong>of</strong> the same n<strong>at</strong>ural disaster. Indeed,<br />
the differences in the extent <strong>of</strong> damage from tropical<br />
storms are rel<strong>at</strong>ed to different levels <strong>of</strong> vulnerability. For<br />
example, the low level <strong>of</strong> human development and severe<br />
environmental degrad<strong>at</strong>ion in Haiti gre<strong>at</strong>ly explain<br />
why the damage is likely to be far larger than in other<br />
Caribbean st<strong>at</strong>es, despite similar levels <strong>of</strong> exposure.<br />
Likewise, the impacts are generally lower in countries<br />
with more highly developed disaster preparedness, such<br />
as Cuba and Jamaica. 1<br />
Thus, the probability <strong>of</strong> a disaster and the magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />
its impact are defined as the product <strong>of</strong> two factors – the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> the hazard and the degree <strong>of</strong> vulnerability – which<br />
together constitute risk. Accordingly, disasters show<br />
where, how and for whom the risk transl<strong>at</strong>es into human<br />
and m<strong>at</strong>erial damages and losses. Analyses <strong>of</strong> the sp<strong>at</strong>ial<br />
and temporal distribution <strong>of</strong> the occurrence and impacts<br />
<strong>of</strong> disasters provide critical inform<strong>at</strong>ion for assessing the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> risk. The geographical distribution and magnitude<br />
<strong>of</strong> the effects allow analysts to (a) gauge the scope<br />
<strong>of</strong> the problem, (b) urge th<strong>at</strong> it be a public policy issue,<br />
(c) identify trends and (d) prioritize actions in the field <strong>of</strong><br />
disaster risk reduction.<br />
1. Global P<strong>at</strong>terns and Trends<br />
in the Occurrence and Impacts<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Disaster</strong>s<br />
Inform<strong>at</strong>ion about the occurrence and effects <strong>of</strong> disasters<br />
worldwide since the beginning <strong>of</strong> the 20th century<br />
is available in the global Emergency Events D<strong>at</strong>abase<br />
(EM-DAT). 2 EM-DAT st<strong>at</strong>istics show th<strong>at</strong> the number<br />
<strong>of</strong> disasters—triggered by the occurrence <strong>of</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ural<br />
hazards—has acceler<strong>at</strong>ed sharply worldwide (see figure<br />
1.1). 3<br />
Although some argue th<strong>at</strong> the increased number <strong>of</strong><br />
disasters shown in Fig. 1.1., up to the 1970s, is due to<br />
improved registering and the existence <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />
centers th<strong>at</strong> monitor these events, the upward trend<br />
has been confirmed for the past four decades through<br />
1<br />
For the links between the impact <strong>of</strong> disasters and human development, see UNDP (2004).<br />
2<br />
EM-DAT was established in 1988 by the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> <strong>Disaster</strong>s (CRED) with the support <strong>of</strong> the Office <strong>of</strong><br />
Foreign <strong>Disaster</strong> Assistance (OFDA) <strong>of</strong> the United St<strong>at</strong>es Agency for Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Development (USAID). It contains d<strong>at</strong>a on the occurrence<br />
and effects <strong>of</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ural and technological disasters in the world, reported since 1900. See http://www.cred.be.<br />
3<br />
Figure 1.1 includes only disasters associ<strong>at</strong>ed with hydrometeorological and geological hazards. Biological hazards (such as epidemics and<br />
insect infest<strong>at</strong>ion) were excluded from the analysis because they fall outside the scope <strong>of</strong> this analysis.<br />
4<br />
EM-DAT distinguishes between disasters associ<strong>at</strong>ed with n<strong>at</strong>ural hazards (n<strong>at</strong>ural disasters) and technological disasters. N<strong>at</strong>ural disasters<br />
include three types: geological hazards (earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, landslides due to tectonic movements, and tsunamis); hydrometeorological<br />
hazards (floods, droughts, storms, extreme temper<strong>at</strong>ures, forest fires, and landslides due to hydrological causes); and biological<br />
hazards (epidemics and insect infest<strong>at</strong>ion).<br />
Chapter 1 Global and L<strong>at</strong>in America and the Caribbean N<strong>at</strong>ural <strong>Disaster</strong> Trends<br />
1