15.11.2013 Views

Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR

Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR

Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

Cultural activities. The n<strong>at</strong>ural terracing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

land provided areas th<strong>at</strong> were ideal for an openair<br />

the<strong>at</strong>er and other cultural, educ<strong>at</strong>ional and leisure<br />

activities. Space was even found for the flying<br />

pole (Palo Volador) 2 used for special community<br />

events. Further, a Tz’utujil regional museum was<br />

built to strengthen cultural identity and use as a<br />

tourist <strong>at</strong>traction.<br />

Services. The resettlement area included wastew<strong>at</strong>er<br />

drains and a n<strong>at</strong>ural wastew<strong>at</strong>er tre<strong>at</strong>ment<br />

plant, along with a well and pipes leading to each<br />

house.<br />

Road infrastructure. The project included<br />

three access roads to the main road, as well as<br />

streets inside the settlement area.<br />

<strong>Risk</strong> management. Possible hazards in the resettlement<br />

area were identified and mapped, with<br />

community particip<strong>at</strong>ion, and a risk-management<br />

plan was designed.<br />

17. Budget<br />

Because the disaster had not been anticip<strong>at</strong>ed, the n<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

budget lacked the funds needed for a project <strong>of</strong><br />

this n<strong>at</strong>ure. Thus, the budgeting and financing mechanism<br />

depended heavily on contributions from various<br />

sources.<br />

The total for the reconstruction project for the 19 municipalities<br />

in Sololá was US$92.7 million, including<br />

US$10.7 million for the municipality <strong>of</strong> Santiago Atitlán.<br />

Table 6.3 provides a breakdown <strong>of</strong> the costs by<br />

activity. The government was able to fund US$3.56<br />

million <strong>of</strong> the total and asked the intern<strong>at</strong>ional community<br />

to contribute the rest in funds and activities<br />

through UNDP. In the end, the government received<br />

contributions from the Spanish Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Cooper<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Agency for Development (Agencia Española de<br />

Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo, AECID),<br />

Andalusian Cooper<strong>at</strong>ion Agency (Agencia Andaluza<br />

de Cooperación Internacional al Desarrollo, AACID),<br />

Swedish Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Development Cooper<strong>at</strong>ion Agency<br />

(SIDA) and UNDP. The delay in the initial funding<br />

slowed the project implement<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Table 6.3. Budget for the Santiago Atitlán Reconstruction<br />

Plan<br />

Item<br />

18. <strong>Resettlement</strong> Schedule<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

Phase I, or Chuk Muk I, took 12 months and was<br />

completed by the end <strong>of</strong> 2007<br />

Chuk Muk 2 took 18 months and was completed<br />

in 2008.<br />

■■<br />

Chuk Muk 3 was finished in 2009<br />

■■<br />

Phase 4 began in February 2008 and was expected<br />

to last 30 months.<br />

19. Alloc<strong>at</strong>ion and Titling<br />

<strong>of</strong> Houses<br />

According to the community organiz<strong>at</strong>ional structures<br />

and p<strong>at</strong>terns, the three principal community leaders assigned<br />

the houses to families. Legal titles were provided<br />

for the land and houses under the c<strong>at</strong>egory <strong>of</strong> “family<br />

property,” which meant they belonged not to the head <strong>of</strong><br />

the household but to the family as a whole. One condition<br />

was th<strong>at</strong> the house could not be sold for 18 years.<br />

20. Technical Training and<br />

Income Gener<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Cost In Us$<br />

Human Settlements 4,296,988<br />

Safe W<strong>at</strong>er 86,800<br />

Environmental Sanit<strong>at</strong>ion 1,235,920<br />

Social Infrastructure 1,787,470<br />

Roads 1,187,200<br />

<strong>Risk</strong> Reduction 287,630<br />

Health And Social Welfare 1,456,056<br />

Economic Reactiv<strong>at</strong>ion 301,000<br />

Citizen Particip<strong>at</strong>ion 18,122<br />

Total 10,657,186<br />

Source: SEGEPLAN. Reconstruction and <strong>Risk</strong> Reduction Plan for the department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sololá. Based on the 2006-2007 Sustainable Development Plan.<br />

A key fe<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> the n<strong>at</strong>ional reconstruction program<br />

was the economic and productive revitaliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

affected communities, to be achieved with support from<br />

2<br />

The Palo Volador is one <strong>of</strong> the most spectacular Gu<strong>at</strong>emalan dances is in which men climb a 100 foot wooden pole, tie themselves to a rope<br />

<strong>at</strong>tached to the top and wrapped around their body, and jump, spinning to the ground.<br />

102 <strong>Preventive</strong> <strong>Resettlement</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Popul<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Disaster</strong>: Experiences from L<strong>at</strong>in America

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!