Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR
Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR
Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
in the event <strong>of</strong> an earthquake (due to movements <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tectonic pl<strong>at</strong>es). In the 20th century, there have been 12<br />
earthquakes, an average <strong>of</strong> one every eight years (IDB –<br />
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2004).<br />
Of the various disasters the country has experienced,<br />
those with the severest social and economic impacts<br />
were the 1976 earthquake, which killed 23,000 people<br />
and caused damage estim<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> 17.9 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
GDP; Hurricane Mitch in 1998, which killed 268 and<br />
caused a 4.7 percent decline in GDP; and Tropical Storm<br />
Stan in 2005, which affected 27 percent <strong>of</strong> the popul<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
Table 6.1 summarizes the impact <strong>of</strong> those events.<br />
Table 6.1. Record <strong>of</strong> High-impact N<strong>at</strong>ural <strong>Disaster</strong>s until 2008<br />
Recent disasters D<strong>at</strong>e Number <strong>of</strong><br />
People Killed<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
People Affected<br />
Economic Losses<br />
(US$ Million)<br />
Earthquake February 1976 23,000 375,000 1 200<br />
Hurricane Mitch November 1998 268 743,000 876<br />
Tropical Storm Stan October 2005 669 3,500,000 983<br />
Source:<br />
- Earthquake in 1976: US Agency for Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Development (USAID), 1978. “<strong>Disaster</strong> relief case report: Gu<strong>at</strong>emala – earthquake February 1976”,<br />
Washington.<br />
- Hurricane Mitch: IDB. 2002. Central America after Hurricane Mitch. The Challenge <strong>of</strong> Turning a <strong>Disaster</strong> into an Opportunity. In: www.iadb.org<br />
- Tropical Storm Stan: USAID. 2006. Response to the Stan <strong>Disaster</strong>.<br />
4. <strong>Risk</strong> Management<br />
The Gu<strong>at</strong>emalan authorities’ concern with regard to vulnerability<br />
and procedures for mitig<strong>at</strong>ing the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
disasters increased in the wake <strong>of</strong> the three mentioned<br />
above. However, the response models differed in each<br />
case due to historical and other special circumstances.<br />
In the 1970s, management typically consisted <strong>of</strong> decisions<br />
taken in a vertical chain <strong>of</strong> command involving the<br />
military, with no particip<strong>at</strong>ion by the popul<strong>at</strong>ion (with<br />
respect to the 1976 earthquake). Toward the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />
20th Century, the response to Hurricane Mitch focused<br />
on reconstructing physical infrastructure, but still within<br />
a vertical decision-making process. The priv<strong>at</strong>e sector<br />
particip<strong>at</strong>ed but the community did not. Finally, in the<br />
first decade <strong>of</strong> the 21st Century, the current model <strong>of</strong><br />
reconstruction with transform<strong>at</strong>ion was developed. This<br />
model not only allowed society to particip<strong>at</strong>e in decision<br />
making with a cultural and gender perspective, but<br />
also emphasized reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the social fabric, respect<br />
for human rights, the incorpor<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> risk management<br />
into sustainable development, and applic<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
<strong>of</strong> the subsidiary-with-solidarity principle.<br />
The historical transform<strong>at</strong>ions in Gu<strong>at</strong>emalan society<br />
and the cumul<strong>at</strong>ive effect <strong>of</strong> the disasters fostered a longer-term<br />
vision <strong>of</strong> risk prevention and management and<br />
helped strengthen the country’s legal and institutional<br />
framework in those areas. Although much remains to<br />
be done, the basis for a sound and str<strong>at</strong>egic approach to<br />
risk management has been laid.<br />
4.1 Hazard and Vulnerability Studies<br />
A critical factor for disaster risk management was the<br />
inadequ<strong>at</strong>e understanding <strong>of</strong> the n<strong>at</strong>ural and social dynamics<br />
th<strong>at</strong> gener<strong>at</strong>e hazards. To overcome th<strong>at</strong> shortcoming,<br />
since the end <strong>of</strong> the 1990s (post Hurricane<br />
Mitch), several studies were conducted. The most notable<br />
were a 2001 review carried out with United N<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
support on disasters and <strong>at</strong>-risk zones, and a 2005 study<br />
on social and environmental vulnerability, by the Institute<br />
<strong>of</strong> Agriculture, N<strong>at</strong>ural Resources and Environment<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Environmental and Agricultural Sciences Faculty<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Rafael Landívar University, which lists the major<br />
steps needed to reduce vulnerability.<br />
In 2004, with Inter-American Development Bank support,<br />
Gu<strong>at</strong>emala began applying the risk management<br />
indic<strong>at</strong>ors system, which made it possible to gauge the<br />
country’s vulnerability and risk and, on th<strong>at</strong> basis, identify<br />
effective risk-management measures th<strong>at</strong> considered<br />
macro-economic, social, institutional and technical<br />
factors.<br />
Chapter 6 The First Tz´utujil City <strong>of</strong> the Twenty-First Century | Gu<strong>at</strong>emala |<br />
87