15.11.2013 Views

Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR

Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR

Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in the event <strong>of</strong> an earthquake (due to movements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tectonic pl<strong>at</strong>es). In the 20th century, there have been 12<br />

earthquakes, an average <strong>of</strong> one every eight years (IDB –<br />

Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2004).<br />

Of the various disasters the country has experienced,<br />

those with the severest social and economic impacts<br />

were the 1976 earthquake, which killed 23,000 people<br />

and caused damage estim<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> 17.9 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

GDP; Hurricane Mitch in 1998, which killed 268 and<br />

caused a 4.7 percent decline in GDP; and Tropical Storm<br />

Stan in 2005, which affected 27 percent <strong>of</strong> the popul<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Table 6.1 summarizes the impact <strong>of</strong> those events.<br />

Table 6.1. Record <strong>of</strong> High-impact N<strong>at</strong>ural <strong>Disaster</strong>s until 2008<br />

Recent disasters D<strong>at</strong>e Number <strong>of</strong><br />

People Killed<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

People Affected<br />

Economic Losses<br />

(US$ Million)<br />

Earthquake February 1976 23,000 375,000 1 200<br />

Hurricane Mitch November 1998 268 743,000 876<br />

Tropical Storm Stan October 2005 669 3,500,000 983<br />

Source:<br />

- Earthquake in 1976: US Agency for Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Development (USAID), 1978. “<strong>Disaster</strong> relief case report: Gu<strong>at</strong>emala – earthquake February 1976”,<br />

Washington.<br />

- Hurricane Mitch: IDB. 2002. Central America after Hurricane Mitch. The Challenge <strong>of</strong> Turning a <strong>Disaster</strong> into an Opportunity. In: www.iadb.org<br />

- Tropical Storm Stan: USAID. 2006. Response to the Stan <strong>Disaster</strong>.<br />

4. <strong>Risk</strong> Management<br />

The Gu<strong>at</strong>emalan authorities’ concern with regard to vulnerability<br />

and procedures for mitig<strong>at</strong>ing the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

disasters increased in the wake <strong>of</strong> the three mentioned<br />

above. However, the response models differed in each<br />

case due to historical and other special circumstances.<br />

In the 1970s, management typically consisted <strong>of</strong> decisions<br />

taken in a vertical chain <strong>of</strong> command involving the<br />

military, with no particip<strong>at</strong>ion by the popul<strong>at</strong>ion (with<br />

respect to the 1976 earthquake). Toward the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

20th Century, the response to Hurricane Mitch focused<br />

on reconstructing physical infrastructure, but still within<br />

a vertical decision-making process. The priv<strong>at</strong>e sector<br />

particip<strong>at</strong>ed but the community did not. Finally, in the<br />

first decade <strong>of</strong> the 21st Century, the current model <strong>of</strong><br />

reconstruction with transform<strong>at</strong>ion was developed. This<br />

model not only allowed society to particip<strong>at</strong>e in decision<br />

making with a cultural and gender perspective, but<br />

also emphasized reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the social fabric, respect<br />

for human rights, the incorpor<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> risk management<br />

into sustainable development, and applic<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the subsidiary-with-solidarity principle.<br />

The historical transform<strong>at</strong>ions in Gu<strong>at</strong>emalan society<br />

and the cumul<strong>at</strong>ive effect <strong>of</strong> the disasters fostered a longer-term<br />

vision <strong>of</strong> risk prevention and management and<br />

helped strengthen the country’s legal and institutional<br />

framework in those areas. Although much remains to<br />

be done, the basis for a sound and str<strong>at</strong>egic approach to<br />

risk management has been laid.<br />

4.1 Hazard and Vulnerability Studies<br />

A critical factor for disaster risk management was the<br />

inadequ<strong>at</strong>e understanding <strong>of</strong> the n<strong>at</strong>ural and social dynamics<br />

th<strong>at</strong> gener<strong>at</strong>e hazards. To overcome th<strong>at</strong> shortcoming,<br />

since the end <strong>of</strong> the 1990s (post Hurricane<br />

Mitch), several studies were conducted. The most notable<br />

were a 2001 review carried out with United N<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

support on disasters and <strong>at</strong>-risk zones, and a 2005 study<br />

on social and environmental vulnerability, by the Institute<br />

<strong>of</strong> Agriculture, N<strong>at</strong>ural Resources and Environment<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Environmental and Agricultural Sciences Faculty<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Rafael Landívar University, which lists the major<br />

steps needed to reduce vulnerability.<br />

In 2004, with Inter-American Development Bank support,<br />

Gu<strong>at</strong>emala began applying the risk management<br />

indic<strong>at</strong>ors system, which made it possible to gauge the<br />

country’s vulnerability and risk and, on th<strong>at</strong> basis, identify<br />

effective risk-management measures th<strong>at</strong> considered<br />

macro-economic, social, institutional and technical<br />

factors.<br />

Chapter 6 The First Tz´utujil City <strong>of</strong> the Twenty-First Century | Gu<strong>at</strong>emala |<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!