Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR
Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR
Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
were maintained. The teams <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals coordin<strong>at</strong>ed<br />
with other entities to provide educ<strong>at</strong>ion and training<br />
programs and encourage beneficiaries to use utilities efficiently,<br />
pay the bills punctually, progressively develop<br />
their houses, improve their management skills, and assume<br />
responsibility for looking after their houses and<br />
public spaces. They also ensured the resettled families<br />
were effectively connected with the basic social services<br />
network (health care, educ<strong>at</strong>ion, welfare and incomegener<strong>at</strong>ing<br />
projects).<br />
The CVP established a post-resettlement assistance period<br />
to be conducted for 12 months, with the following goals:<br />
■■<br />
■■<br />
Boosting self-management capacity for integr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
into urban life;<br />
Enrolling 100 percent <strong>of</strong> the school-age popul<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
in the educ<strong>at</strong>ional system;<br />
■■<br />
■■<br />
■■<br />
■■<br />
Providing 100 percent <strong>of</strong> the popul<strong>at</strong>ion access to<br />
health care;<br />
Providing care for 100 percent <strong>of</strong> the disabled;<br />
Providing care for 100 percent <strong>of</strong> the elderly;<br />
Supporting income-gener<strong>at</strong>ion projects.<br />
10. Cost<br />
The total investment in the resettlement program and<br />
the activities rel<strong>at</strong>ed to restoring the reclaimed land<br />
from 2004-2009 was US$17 million. According to the<br />
CVP, the average cost <strong>of</strong> a house, including the social,<br />
technical and legal assistance per household, was<br />
US$15,121. No estim<strong>at</strong>e was made <strong>of</strong> educ<strong>at</strong>ion and social<br />
integr<strong>at</strong>ion costs (see Table 5.8).<br />
Table 5.8. Total Cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>Resettlement</strong>*<br />
Investment<br />
Program<br />
Institution<br />
Cost (US<br />
Dollars)<br />
in Millions<br />
Source<br />
Resettling households CVP 15.0 Resetlement Director<strong>at</strong>e, Sub Director<strong>at</strong>e<br />
<strong>of</strong> Finance and Planning Advisory Office<br />
CVP<br />
Improving habit<strong>at</strong>s<br />
District Health Secretary<br />
Hospital Rafael Uribe Uribe<br />
0.17 Sanit<strong>at</strong>ion Director<strong>at</strong>e<br />
Hospital Rafael Uribe Uribe<br />
Identifying <strong>at</strong>-risk households FOPAE 0.23 Ecosistems Director<strong>at</strong>e<br />
District Environment Secretari<strong>at</strong><br />
Recovering degraded land<br />
environmentally<br />
Recovering degraded land<br />
environmentally<br />
Improving resettled households’<br />
productive activities<br />
District Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Environment<br />
Local Development Fund<br />
Rafael Uribe Uribe<br />
CVP<br />
Secretari<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />
Development<br />
IPES<br />
Total cost 17.04<br />
*Cut <strong>of</strong>f d<strong>at</strong>e: December 31,2009<br />
Source: CVP, 2010<br />
0.59 FOPAE<br />
Ecosistems Director<strong>at</strong>e<br />
District Environment Secretari<strong>at</strong><br />
0.21 Ecosistems Director<strong>at</strong>e<br />
District Environment Secretari<strong>at</strong><br />
0.84 Ecosistems Director<strong>at</strong>e<br />
District Environment Secretari<strong>at</strong><br />
11. Main Challenges<br />
The implement<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a resettlement program is not<br />
free from problems and obstacles. Table 5.9 summarizes<br />
the main issues, such as the intervention <strong>of</strong> third parties<br />
interested in obtaining personal benefits, the fear<br />
<strong>of</strong> the head <strong>of</strong> household to provide some inform<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />
the lack <strong>of</strong> legal tools to solve some problems, and problems<br />
with host popul<strong>at</strong>ions. Table 5.9 also shows how<br />
the inter-institutional and inter-sectoral actions, as well<br />
as the CVP management, were key to overcoming the<br />
problems.<br />
Chapter 5 Nueva Esperanza: A <strong>Resettlement</strong> Case with <strong>Risk</strong> Management and Land Use Planning Approach | Colombia |<br />
79