15.11.2013 Views

Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR

Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR

Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

were maintained. The teams <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals coordin<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

with other entities to provide educ<strong>at</strong>ion and training<br />

programs and encourage beneficiaries to use utilities efficiently,<br />

pay the bills punctually, progressively develop<br />

their houses, improve their management skills, and assume<br />

responsibility for looking after their houses and<br />

public spaces. They also ensured the resettled families<br />

were effectively connected with the basic social services<br />

network (health care, educ<strong>at</strong>ion, welfare and incomegener<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

projects).<br />

The CVP established a post-resettlement assistance period<br />

to be conducted for 12 months, with the following goals:<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

Boosting self-management capacity for integr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

into urban life;<br />

Enrolling 100 percent <strong>of</strong> the school-age popul<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

in the educ<strong>at</strong>ional system;<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

Providing 100 percent <strong>of</strong> the popul<strong>at</strong>ion access to<br />

health care;<br />

Providing care for 100 percent <strong>of</strong> the disabled;<br />

Providing care for 100 percent <strong>of</strong> the elderly;<br />

Supporting income-gener<strong>at</strong>ion projects.<br />

10. Cost<br />

The total investment in the resettlement program and<br />

the activities rel<strong>at</strong>ed to restoring the reclaimed land<br />

from 2004-2009 was US$17 million. According to the<br />

CVP, the average cost <strong>of</strong> a house, including the social,<br />

technical and legal assistance per household, was<br />

US$15,121. No estim<strong>at</strong>e was made <strong>of</strong> educ<strong>at</strong>ion and social<br />

integr<strong>at</strong>ion costs (see Table 5.8).<br />

Table 5.8. Total Cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>Resettlement</strong>*<br />

Investment<br />

Program<br />

Institution<br />

Cost (US<br />

Dollars)<br />

in Millions<br />

Source<br />

Resettling households CVP 15.0 Resetlement Director<strong>at</strong>e, Sub Director<strong>at</strong>e<br />

<strong>of</strong> Finance and Planning Advisory Office<br />

CVP<br />

Improving habit<strong>at</strong>s<br />

District Health Secretary<br />

Hospital Rafael Uribe Uribe<br />

0.17 Sanit<strong>at</strong>ion Director<strong>at</strong>e<br />

Hospital Rafael Uribe Uribe<br />

Identifying <strong>at</strong>-risk households FOPAE 0.23 Ecosistems Director<strong>at</strong>e<br />

District Environment Secretari<strong>at</strong><br />

Recovering degraded land<br />

environmentally<br />

Recovering degraded land<br />

environmentally<br />

Improving resettled households’<br />

productive activities<br />

District Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Environment<br />

Local Development Fund<br />

Rafael Uribe Uribe<br />

CVP<br />

Secretari<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />

Development<br />

IPES<br />

Total cost 17.04<br />

*Cut <strong>of</strong>f d<strong>at</strong>e: December 31,2009<br />

Source: CVP, 2010<br />

0.59 FOPAE<br />

Ecosistems Director<strong>at</strong>e<br />

District Environment Secretari<strong>at</strong><br />

0.21 Ecosistems Director<strong>at</strong>e<br />

District Environment Secretari<strong>at</strong><br />

0.84 Ecosistems Director<strong>at</strong>e<br />

District Environment Secretari<strong>at</strong><br />

11. Main Challenges<br />

The implement<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a resettlement program is not<br />

free from problems and obstacles. Table 5.9 summarizes<br />

the main issues, such as the intervention <strong>of</strong> third parties<br />

interested in obtaining personal benefits, the fear<br />

<strong>of</strong> the head <strong>of</strong> household to provide some inform<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

the lack <strong>of</strong> legal tools to solve some problems, and problems<br />

with host popul<strong>at</strong>ions. Table 5.9 also shows how<br />

the inter-institutional and inter-sectoral actions, as well<br />

as the CVP management, were key to overcoming the<br />

problems.<br />

Chapter 5 Nueva Esperanza: A <strong>Resettlement</strong> Case with <strong>Risk</strong> Management and Land Use Planning Approach | Colombia |<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!