Marine Ecosystems Research Department - jamstec japan agency ...
Marine Ecosystems Research Department - jamstec japan agency ...
Marine Ecosystems Research Department - jamstec japan agency ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
JAMSTEC 2002 Annual Report<br />
Frontier <strong>Research</strong> System for Global Change<br />
Ozone, a greenhouse gas as well as carbon dioxide<br />
and methane, is the most important chemical species<br />
for tropospheric photochemistry to control the lifetime<br />
of other chemical species. The principal objective of<br />
our study is to evaluate the influence of tropospheric<br />
and stratospheric ozone on climate change by using a<br />
photochemically coupled global circulation model.<br />
Additionally, our model will be used as a sub-component<br />
of the integrated model, and the interaction with<br />
other sub-component such as vegetation and ocean<br />
chemistry will be considered. In this year, a new<br />
advection scheme was introduced into the model. After<br />
-years' integration, it is found that the new advection<br />
scheme improves the humidity in the upper troposphere.<br />
Next, the model, which is fully coupled with<br />
tropospheric photochemistry, is used for the simulation<br />
to evaluate impacts of emission change and climate<br />
change independently (Figure ). Global mean<br />
methane concentration increased to about ppmv in<br />
with emission change only, but to . ppmv with<br />
climate change, reflecting the impact of temperature<br />
and water vapor increases on the methane lifetime<br />
(Figure (b)).<br />
b-. Accurate Estimate of Feedbacks on the Global<br />
Warming through Interactions in the Cloud –<br />
aerosol – radiation System<br />
The purpose of our sub-group is to develop the parameterization<br />
for GCM to estimate the effect of tropospheric<br />
aerosol on the optical properties of clouds i.e.<br />
the indirect radiative forcing of aerosol.<br />
First, we investigated the parameterization to estimate<br />
the indirect radiative forcing of aerosol in<br />
CCSR/NIES-GCM and ECHAM-GCM (Max Plank<br />
Institute). Second, we developed the parameterization<br />
to estimate the effect of cloud condensation nuclei<br />
(CCN) on the microstructure of cloud (Kuba et al.,<br />
, Kuba and Iwabuchi, ). Third, we examined<br />
the treatment the output of SPRINTARS (aerosol<br />
transportation model: Takemura et al., ) to make<br />
this parameterization effective.<br />
The scale gap between cloud microphysical model<br />
and GCM is remarkable. To bridge this scale gap we<br />
are planning to install the cloud microphysical model<br />
in NICAM (New ICosahedral Atmospheric Model:<br />
Satoh, , Tomita, ) and MRI/NPD-NHM<br />
(Saito and Kato, ). We conducted many numerical<br />
experiments using our cloud microphysical model with<br />
particle method to develop the parameterization to estimate<br />
the relationship between CCN and cloud<br />
microstructure. Due to the scale gap between microphysical<br />
model and GCM, there are many problems to<br />
install this parameterization to GCM, such as how to<br />
estimate the updraft velocity in the cloud from grid<br />
mean updraft velocity, and how to estimate LWP of the<br />
cloud from the grid mean LWP. Therefore, we are trying<br />
to compare the simulated results between GCM<br />
(grid scale is a few hundred km), NICAM ( km) coupled<br />
with cloud microphysical model with base function<br />
expansion method and NHM ( m) coupled with<br />
cloud microphysical model with bin method.<br />
Trp. O3 Burden [TgO3]<br />
500<br />
450<br />
400<br />
350<br />
Tropospheric Ozone Burden: Global<br />
A2: Exp2<br />
A2: Exp1<br />
4.0<br />
Global CH4 concentration<br />
A2: Exp2<br />
A2: Exp1<br />
1.1<br />
a)<br />
3.5<br />
3.0<br />
b)<br />
1<br />
0.9<br />
0.8<br />
c)<br />
2.5<br />
0.7<br />
2.0<br />
0.6<br />
CH4 mixing ratio [ppmv]<br />
Sulfate burden [TgS]<br />
1.2<br />
Sulfate burden<br />
A2: Exp2<br />
A2: Exp1<br />
300<br />
2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100<br />
year<br />
1.5<br />
2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100<br />
year<br />
0.5<br />
2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100<br />
year<br />
Fig.32 Time evolution of (a) tropospheric ozone inventory, (b) global mean methane, and (c) sulphate<br />
aerosol inventory simulated by the model using the SRES-A2 scenario. Solid lines represent experiments<br />
that consider the effects of climatic changes, and dashed lines represent those that do not.<br />
152