15.11.2013 Views

Marine Ecosystems Research Department - jamstec japan agency ...

Marine Ecosystems Research Department - jamstec japan agency ...

Marine Ecosystems Research Department - jamstec japan agency ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JAMSTEC 2002 Annual Report<br />

Frontier <strong>Research</strong> System for Global Change<br />

Ozone, a greenhouse gas as well as carbon dioxide<br />

and methane, is the most important chemical species<br />

for tropospheric photochemistry to control the lifetime<br />

of other chemical species. The principal objective of<br />

our study is to evaluate the influence of tropospheric<br />

and stratospheric ozone on climate change by using a<br />

photochemically coupled global circulation model.<br />

Additionally, our model will be used as a sub-component<br />

of the integrated model, and the interaction with<br />

other sub-component such as vegetation and ocean<br />

chemistry will be considered. In this year, a new<br />

advection scheme was introduced into the model. After<br />

-years' integration, it is found that the new advection<br />

scheme improves the humidity in the upper troposphere.<br />

Next, the model, which is fully coupled with<br />

tropospheric photochemistry, is used for the simulation<br />

to evaluate impacts of emission change and climate<br />

change independently (Figure ). Global mean<br />

methane concentration increased to about ppmv in<br />

with emission change only, but to . ppmv with<br />

climate change, reflecting the impact of temperature<br />

and water vapor increases on the methane lifetime<br />

(Figure (b)).<br />

b-. Accurate Estimate of Feedbacks on the Global<br />

Warming through Interactions in the Cloud –<br />

aerosol – radiation System<br />

The purpose of our sub-group is to develop the parameterization<br />

for GCM to estimate the effect of tropospheric<br />

aerosol on the optical properties of clouds i.e.<br />

the indirect radiative forcing of aerosol.<br />

First, we investigated the parameterization to estimate<br />

the indirect radiative forcing of aerosol in<br />

CCSR/NIES-GCM and ECHAM-GCM (Max Plank<br />

Institute). Second, we developed the parameterization<br />

to estimate the effect of cloud condensation nuclei<br />

(CCN) on the microstructure of cloud (Kuba et al.,<br />

, Kuba and Iwabuchi, ). Third, we examined<br />

the treatment the output of SPRINTARS (aerosol<br />

transportation model: Takemura et al., ) to make<br />

this parameterization effective.<br />

The scale gap between cloud microphysical model<br />

and GCM is remarkable. To bridge this scale gap we<br />

are planning to install the cloud microphysical model<br />

in NICAM (New ICosahedral Atmospheric Model:<br />

Satoh, , Tomita, ) and MRI/NPD-NHM<br />

(Saito and Kato, ). We conducted many numerical<br />

experiments using our cloud microphysical model with<br />

particle method to develop the parameterization to estimate<br />

the relationship between CCN and cloud<br />

microstructure. Due to the scale gap between microphysical<br />

model and GCM, there are many problems to<br />

install this parameterization to GCM, such as how to<br />

estimate the updraft velocity in the cloud from grid<br />

mean updraft velocity, and how to estimate LWP of the<br />

cloud from the grid mean LWP. Therefore, we are trying<br />

to compare the simulated results between GCM<br />

(grid scale is a few hundred km), NICAM ( km) coupled<br />

with cloud microphysical model with base function<br />

expansion method and NHM ( m) coupled with<br />

cloud microphysical model with bin method.<br />

Trp. O3 Burden [TgO3]<br />

500<br />

450<br />

400<br />

350<br />

Tropospheric Ozone Burden: Global<br />

A2: Exp2<br />

A2: Exp1<br />

4.0<br />

Global CH4 concentration<br />

A2: Exp2<br />

A2: Exp1<br />

1.1<br />

a)<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

b)<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

c)<br />

2.5<br />

0.7<br />

2.0<br />

0.6<br />

CH4 mixing ratio [ppmv]<br />

Sulfate burden [TgS]<br />

1.2<br />

Sulfate burden<br />

A2: Exp2<br />

A2: Exp1<br />

300<br />

2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100<br />

year<br />

1.5<br />

2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100<br />

year<br />

0.5<br />

2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100<br />

year<br />

Fig.32 Time evolution of (a) tropospheric ozone inventory, (b) global mean methane, and (c) sulphate<br />

aerosol inventory simulated by the model using the SRES-A2 scenario. Solid lines represent experiments<br />

that consider the effects of climatic changes, and dashed lines represent those that do not.<br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!