15.11.2013 Views

energize oil & gas – issue 01-2013 - GL Group

energize oil & gas – issue 01-2013 - GL Group

energize oil & gas – issue 01-2013 - GL Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

integrity process safety<br />

Design Check Avoids Costs<br />

<strong>GL</strong> Noble Denton is ideally positioned to provide independent process safety<br />

design verification to both operators and designers of <strong>oil</strong> and <strong>gas</strong> facilities<br />

Given the nature of the risks involved in the<br />

<strong>oil</strong> and <strong>gas</strong> industry, ensuring the safety and<br />

integrity of operating assets is paramount. For<br />

most companies, process safety means making sure the<br />

facilities are well designed, safely operated, and properly<br />

inspected and maintained. The consequences of errors or<br />

omissions in the process and safety design for new and<br />

existing assets can be potentially disastrous.<br />

Essential Verification<br />

In the case of new process designs, it is often not possible<br />

for the client organisation to verify the work of the designer<br />

in sufficient detail to demonstrate that the design is correct<br />

and has the required integrity. Equally, it is often difficult<br />

for designers to mobilise independent resources to assure<br />

themselves that their design is<br />

abstract<br />

without errors that may lead to<br />

Complex asset designs harbour process safety <strong>issue</strong>s. In these<br />

significant risk potential<br />

situations, an independent thirdparty<br />

verification of the process<br />

Design verification can reveal hidden<br />

hazards early, avoiding costly<br />

repairs at a later time<br />

and safety aspects of the design<br />

is beneficial to provide assurance<br />

that both the overall approach and the detailed calculations<br />

performed will result in a safe process plant.<br />

Although for existing operational facilities the possible<br />

outcomes from errors or omissions in the process design are<br />

similar, the challenges to verify process safety are different.<br />

The process plant may be old and key design documents<br />

no longer relevant as the facility may have<br />

been subject to a number of phases of<br />

redevelopment or major modification.<br />

In these instances, it is essential that the<br />

overall approach to process safety is consistent<br />

and the detailed calculations underpinning<br />

the design are still relevant.<br />

For maximum return from the independent<br />

verification of process safety in<br />

design, it would typically be conducted at the<br />

following stages of a project or asset lifecycle:<br />

Towards the end of the FEED and detailed design<br />

stages of a new project, to ensure that the design<br />

has adequately addressed process safety<br />

and is acceptable to take forward.<br />

After piecemeal or major plant modifications<br />

to an existing asset when<br />

the original process safety view of<br />

the facility may have been compromised<br />

by subsequent changes.<br />

After acquiring new assets when the<br />

detailed approach to process safety<br />

needs to be verified.<br />

Suitable Facility<br />

The service provided by <strong>GL</strong> Noble<br />

Denton is aimed specifically at the <strong>oil</strong><br />

and <strong>gas</strong> industry, including LNG liq-<br />

34 energıze

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!