leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ...
leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ... leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ...
GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Leakage Collection Layers Due to Geomembrane Defects 1.0 Critical value of R w (dimensionless) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Crit (R wworst ) Crit (R wrand ) 0 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 1 10 100 1000 Dimensionless parameter, μ Figure 12. Maximum values of the wetted fractions without overlapping of wetted zones in the worst scenario, R wworst , and in the random scenario, R wrand . Notes: Crit (R w worst ) was calculated using Equation 136, and Crit (R w rand ) using Equation 138 for μ ≤ 2and Equation 140 for μ ≥ 2; μ is defined by Equation 109. Values of Crit (R w worst )andCrit(R w rand )arealso presented in Table 4. zone occupies the entire leakage collection layer area in Figure 11, hence the upper valueof1forCrit(R w worst ) in Figure 12. Also represented in Figure 12 is the critical value of R w rand ,Crit(R w rand ), which is the maximum value that R w rand can have without overlapping of the wetted zones related to the various individual primary liner defects. Selecting the value of the frequency F to be used in the calculation of Crit(R w rand ) is not easy. For the sake of consistency with the calculation of Crit(R w worst ), the same frequency (i.e. the frequency given by Equation 134) is used. Accordingly, combining Equations 39, 121 and 134 gives the following value of Crit (R w rand )forμ ≤ 2: Crit ( R ) w rand 1 F = H G 15 to L sinb I LF + KJ 1 NM HG Combining Equations 109 and 137 gives: I 2 2 -1/ 2 F HG 2 L sinb 2 L sinb - 2 1+ to KJ to I KJ O QP (137) 252 GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL S 1997, VOL. 4, NOS. 3-4
GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Leakage Collection Layers Due to Geomembrane Defects L F NM HG 2 m Crit ( R w rand ) = 1 + 15 I F HG I KJ 2 -1/ 2 2 2 - 2 1+ mKJ m O QP (138) Combining Equations 126 and 134 gives the following value of Crit(R w rand )for μ ≥ 2: Crit ( R wrand ) 1 F = H G 15 t L sinb I KJ 2 F HG 52 / 52 / 2 L sinb 2 L sinb 1 + + 1 - t KJ t 2 L sinb 1 + t o o o I F HG o I - KJ 2 (139) Combining Equations 109 and 139 gives: F HG 52 / 52 / 2 2 1 + + 1 - 2 m m Crit ( R wrand KJ m ) = 12 / 15 F 2I 1 + m I HG F HG KJ I - KJ 2 (140) If, in the design of a leakage collection layer, Equation 107 gives a value of R w worst greater than Crit(R w worst ) and/or Equation 122 gives a value of R w rand greater than Crit(R w rand), this means that wetted zones related to different defects overlap. If this happens, the equations presented earlier in Section 4.4 are no longer valid. In this case, the design (in particular the leachate head calculation) should be done by assuming that the entire leakage collection layer area is wetted, i.e. R w = 1. This is further discussed in Section 5.2.4. It should be recognized that even if the wetted fraction, R w , is small (i.e. smaller, or even much smaller, than Crit(R w rand ) given by Table 4 or Figure 12) there is always a possibility that the wetted zones related to two different defects in the primary liner will overlap. For example, if, in a large primary liner, there are only two small defects generating a small rate of leachate migration, the two wetted zones will overlap if the two defects are close to each other. Therefore, the design engineer can always elect to ignore the values of R w rand and R w worst calculated as indicated above (i.e. assuming no wetted zone overlapping if R w rand
- Page 1 and 2: Technical Paper by J.P. Giroud, B.A
- Page 3 and 4: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 5 and 6: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 7 and 8: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 9 and 10: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 11 and 12: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 13 and 14: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 15 and 16: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 17 and 18: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 19 and 20: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 21 and 22: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 23 and 24: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 25 and 26: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 27 and 28: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 29 and 30: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 31 and 32: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 33 and 34: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 35 and 36: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 37: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 41 and 42: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 43 and 44: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 45 and 46: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 47 and 48: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 49 and 50: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 51 and 52: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 53 and 54: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 55 and 56: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 57 and 58: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 59 and 60: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 61 and 62: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 63 and 64: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 65 and 66: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 67 and 68: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 69 and 70: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 71 and 72: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 73 and 74: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 75 and 76: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 77 and 78: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow <strong>in</strong> Leakage Collection Layers Due <strong>to</strong> Geomembrane Defects<br />
1.0<br />
Critical value of R w (dimensionless)<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
Crit (R wworst )<br />
Crit (R wrand )<br />
0<br />
10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 1 10 100 1000<br />
Dimensionless parameter, μ<br />
Figure 12. Maximum values of the wetted fractions without overlapp<strong>in</strong>g of wetted zones<br />
<strong>in</strong> the worst scenario, R wworst , and <strong>in</strong> the random scenario, R wrand .<br />
Notes: Crit (R w worst ) was calculated us<strong>in</strong>g Equation 136, and Crit (R w rand ) us<strong>in</strong>g Equation 138 for μ ≤ 2and<br />
Equation 140 for μ ≥ 2; μ is def<strong>in</strong>ed by Equation 109. Values of Crit (R w worst )andCrit(R w rand )arealso<br />
presented <strong>in</strong> Table 4.<br />
zone occupies the entire <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer area <strong>in</strong> Figure 11, hence the upper<br />
valueof1forCrit(R w worst ) <strong>in</strong> Figure 12.<br />
Also represented <strong>in</strong> Figure 12 is the critical value of R w rand ,Crit(R w rand ), which is the<br />
maximum value that R w rand can have without overlapp<strong>in</strong>g of the wetted zones related<br />
<strong>to</strong> the various <strong>in</strong>dividual primary l<strong>in</strong>er <strong>defects</strong>. Select<strong>in</strong>g the value of the frequency F<br />
<strong>to</strong> be used <strong>in</strong> the calculation of Crit(R w rand ) is not easy. For the sake of consistency with<br />
the calculation of Crit(R w worst ), the same frequency (i.e. the frequency given by Equation<br />
134) is used. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Equations 39, 121 and 134 gives the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
value of Crit (R w rand )forμ ≤ 2:<br />
Crit ( R )<br />
w rand<br />
1 F<br />
=<br />
H G<br />
15<br />
<strong>to</strong><br />
L s<strong>in</strong>b<br />
I LF<br />
+<br />
KJ 1<br />
NM<br />
HG<br />
Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Equations 109 and 137 gives:<br />
I<br />
2 2 -1/<br />
2<br />
F<br />
HG<br />
2 L s<strong>in</strong>b<br />
2 L s<strong>in</strong>b<br />
- 2 1+<br />
<strong>to</strong><br />
KJ<br />
<strong>to</strong><br />
I<br />
KJ<br />
O<br />
QP<br />
(137)<br />
252 GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL S 1997, VOL. 4, NOS. 3-4