leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ...

leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ... leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ...

geosyntheticssociety.org
from geosyntheticssociety.org More from this publisher
14.11.2013 Views

GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Leakage Collection Layers Due to Geomembrane Defects 1.0 Critical value of R w (dimensionless) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Crit (R wworst ) Crit (R wrand ) 0 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 1 10 100 1000 Dimensionless parameter, μ Figure 12. Maximum values of the wetted fractions without overlapping of wetted zones in the worst scenario, R wworst , and in the random scenario, R wrand . Notes: Crit (R w worst ) was calculated using Equation 136, and Crit (R w rand ) using Equation 138 for μ ≤ 2and Equation 140 for μ ≥ 2; μ is defined by Equation 109. Values of Crit (R w worst )andCrit(R w rand )arealso presented in Table 4. zone occupies the entire leakage collection layer area in Figure 11, hence the upper valueof1forCrit(R w worst ) in Figure 12. Also represented in Figure 12 is the critical value of R w rand ,Crit(R w rand ), which is the maximum value that R w rand can have without overlapping of the wetted zones related to the various individual primary liner defects. Selecting the value of the frequency F to be used in the calculation of Crit(R w rand ) is not easy. For the sake of consistency with the calculation of Crit(R w worst ), the same frequency (i.e. the frequency given by Equation 134) is used. Accordingly, combining Equations 39, 121 and 134 gives the following value of Crit (R w rand )forμ ≤ 2: Crit ( R ) w rand 1 F = H G 15 to L sinb I LF + KJ 1 NM HG Combining Equations 109 and 137 gives: I 2 2 -1/ 2 F HG 2 L sinb 2 L sinb - 2 1+ to KJ to I KJ O QP (137) 252 GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL S 1997, VOL. 4, NOS. 3-4

GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Leakage Collection Layers Due to Geomembrane Defects L F NM HG 2 m Crit ( R w rand ) = 1 + 15 I F HG I KJ 2 -1/ 2 2 2 - 2 1+ mKJ m O QP (138) Combining Equations 126 and 134 gives the following value of Crit(R w rand )for μ ≥ 2: Crit ( R wrand ) 1 F = H G 15 t L sinb I KJ 2 F HG 52 / 52 / 2 L sinb 2 L sinb 1 + + 1 - t KJ t 2 L sinb 1 + t o o o I F HG o I - KJ 2 (139) Combining Equations 109 and 139 gives: F HG 52 / 52 / 2 2 1 + + 1 - 2 m m Crit ( R wrand KJ m ) = 12 / 15 F 2I 1 + m I HG F HG KJ I - KJ 2 (140) If, in the design of a leakage collection layer, Equation 107 gives a value of R w worst greater than Crit(R w worst ) and/or Equation 122 gives a value of R w rand greater than Crit(R w rand), this means that wetted zones related to different defects overlap. If this happens, the equations presented earlier in Section 4.4 are no longer valid. In this case, the design (in particular the leachate head calculation) should be done by assuming that the entire leakage collection layer area is wetted, i.e. R w = 1. This is further discussed in Section 5.2.4. It should be recognized that even if the wetted fraction, R w , is small (i.e. smaller, or even much smaller, than Crit(R w rand ) given by Table 4 or Figure 12) there is always a possibility that the wetted zones related to two different defects in the primary liner will overlap. For example, if, in a large primary liner, there are only two small defects generating a small rate of leachate migration, the two wetted zones will overlap if the two defects are close to each other. Therefore, the design engineer can always elect to ignore the values of R w rand and R w worst calculated as indicated above (i.e. assuming no wetted zone overlapping if R w rand

GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow <strong>in</strong> Leakage Collection Layers Due <strong>to</strong> Geomembrane Defects<br />

1.0<br />

Critical value of R w (dimensionless)<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

Crit (R wworst )<br />

Crit (R wrand )<br />

0<br />

10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 1 10 100 1000<br />

Dimensionless parameter, μ<br />

Figure 12. Maximum values of the wetted fractions without overlapp<strong>in</strong>g of wetted zones<br />

<strong>in</strong> the worst scenario, R wworst , and <strong>in</strong> the random scenario, R wrand .<br />

Notes: Crit (R w worst ) was calculated us<strong>in</strong>g Equation 136, and Crit (R w rand ) us<strong>in</strong>g Equation 138 for μ ≤ 2and<br />

Equation 140 for μ ≥ 2; μ is def<strong>in</strong>ed by Equation 109. Values of Crit (R w worst )andCrit(R w rand )arealso<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> Table 4.<br />

zone occupies the entire <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer area <strong>in</strong> Figure 11, hence the upper<br />

valueof1forCrit(R w worst ) <strong>in</strong> Figure 12.<br />

Also represented <strong>in</strong> Figure 12 is the critical value of R w rand ,Crit(R w rand ), which is the<br />

maximum value that R w rand can have without overlapp<strong>in</strong>g of the wetted zones related<br />

<strong>to</strong> the various <strong>in</strong>dividual primary l<strong>in</strong>er <strong>defects</strong>. Select<strong>in</strong>g the value of the frequency F<br />

<strong>to</strong> be used <strong>in</strong> the calculation of Crit(R w rand ) is not easy. For the sake of consistency with<br />

the calculation of Crit(R w worst ), the same frequency (i.e. the frequency given by Equation<br />

134) is used. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Equations 39, 121 and 134 gives the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

value of Crit (R w rand )forμ ≤ 2:<br />

Crit ( R )<br />

w rand<br />

1 F<br />

=<br />

H G<br />

15<br />

<strong>to</strong><br />

L s<strong>in</strong>b<br />

I LF<br />

+<br />

KJ 1<br />

NM<br />

HG<br />

Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Equations 109 and 137 gives:<br />

I<br />

2 2 -1/<br />

2<br />

F<br />

HG<br />

2 L s<strong>in</strong>b<br />

2 L s<strong>in</strong>b<br />

- 2 1+<br />

<strong>to</strong><br />

KJ<br />

<strong>to</strong><br />

I<br />

KJ<br />

O<br />

QP<br />

(137)<br />

252 GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL S 1997, VOL. 4, NOS. 3-4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!