14.11.2013 Views

leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ...

leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ...

leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow <strong>in</strong> Leakage Collection Layers Due <strong>to</strong> Geomembrane Defects<br />

Table 4. Values of λ worst , λ rand , λ worst /λ rand , Crit(R wworst ) and Crit(R wrand ) as a function of the<br />

dimensionless parameter μ.<br />

μ λ worst λ rand λ worst /λ rand Crit (R w worst ) Crit (R w rand )<br />

1 × 10 -4 1.886 × 10 -2 7.543 × 10 -3 2.500 0.667 0.267<br />

2 × 10 -4 2.667 × 10 -2 1.067 × 10 -2 2.500 0.667 0.267<br />

3 × 10 -4 3.267 × 10 -2 1.307 × 10 -2 2.500 0.667 0.267<br />

5 × 10 -4 4.218 × 10 -2 1.688 × 10 -2 2.499 0.667 0.267<br />

1 × 10 -3 5.967 × 10 -2 2.388 × 10 -2 2.499 0.667 0.267<br />

2 × 10 -3 8.445 × 10 -2 3.382 × 10 -2 2.497 0.667 0.267<br />

3 × 10 -3 1.035 × 10 -1 4.147 × 10 -2 2.496 0.668 0.267<br />

5 × 10 -3 1.338 × 10 -1 5.367 × 10 -2 2.493 0.668 0.268<br />

1 × 10 -2 1.899 × 10 -1 7.637 × 10 -2 2.487 0.670 0.269<br />

2 × 10 -2 2.704 × 10 -1 1.094 × 10 -1 2.473 0.673 0.272<br />

3 × 10 -2 3.334 × 10 -1 1.356 × 10 -1 2.459 0.675 0.275<br />

5 × 10 -2 4.359 × 10 -1 1.794 × 10 -1 2.430 0.681 0.280<br />

1 × 10 -1 6.349 × 10 -1 2.692 × 10 -1 2.359 0.693 0.294<br />

2 × 10 -1 9.462 × 10 -1 4.259 × 10 -1 2.222 0.713 0.321<br />

3 × 10 -1 1.214 5.787 × 10 -1 2.097 0.731 0.348<br />

5 × 10 -1 1.697 8.984 × 10 -1 1.889 0.759 0.402<br />

1 2.797 1.812 1.544 0.808 0.523<br />

2 4.876 3.901 1.250 0.862 0.690<br />

3 6.910 5.941 1.163 0.892 0.767<br />

5 1.094 × 10 1 9.966 1.098 0.925 0.842<br />

1 × 10 1 2.097 × 10 1 1.998 × 10 1 1.049 0.957 0.912<br />

2 × 10 1 4.098 × 10 1 3.999 × 10 1 1.025 0.977 0.953<br />

3 × 10 1 6.099 × 10 1 5.999 × 10 1 1.017 0.984 0.968<br />

5 × 10 1 1.010 × 10 2 1.000 × 10 2 1.010 0.990 0.981<br />

1 × 10 2 2.010 × 10 2 2.000 × 10 2 1.005 0.995 0.990<br />

2 × 10 2 4.010 × 10 2 4.000 × 10 2 1.002 0.998 0.995<br />

3 × 10 2 6.010 × 10 2 6.000 × 10 2 1.002 0.998 0.997<br />

5 × 10 2 1.001 × 10 3 1.000 × 10 3 1.001 0.999 0.998<br />

1 × 10 3 2.001 × 10 3 2.000 × 10 3 1.001 1.000 0.999<br />

2 × 10 3 4.001 × 10 3 4.000 × 10 3 1.000 1.000 1.000<br />

3 × 10 3 6.001 × 10 3 6.000 × 10 3 1.000 1.000 1.000<br />

5 × 10 3 1.000 × 10 4 1.000 × 10 4 1.000 1.000 1.000<br />

Notes: The dimensionless parameter μ is def<strong>in</strong>ed by Equation 109. The follow<strong>in</strong>g equations were used <strong>to</strong><br />

calculate the tabulated values: λ worst , Equation 108; λ rand , Equation 123 for μ ≤ 2 and Equation 127 for μ ≥ 2;<br />

Crit(R w worst ), Equation 136; and Crit(R w rand ), Equation 138 for μ ≤ 2 and Equation 140 for μ ≥ 2. It is<br />

important <strong>to</strong> note that the tabulated values are valid only if the wetted areas related <strong>to</strong> various <strong>defects</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

primary l<strong>in</strong>er do not overlap. Values of λ worst and λ rand are also presented <strong>in</strong> Figure 10, and values of<br />

Crit(R w worst )andCrit(R w rand ) <strong>in</strong> Figure 12.<br />

246 GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL S 1997, VOL. 4, NOS. 3-4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!