leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ...
leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ... leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ...
GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Leakage Collection Layers Due to Geomembrane Defects W max F HG tLCL Q = 1+ 1 2 sinb kt LCL L I + KJ N M t LCL 4 L sinb F HG Q 1 + 2 kt LCL O I KJ Q P 12 / (47) 4.2.5 Parametric Study Widths of wetted zones calculated using equations given in Section 4.2 are presented in Table 3. It appears that the width of the wetted zone increases for increasing rates of flow through the geomembrane defect and for decreasing hydraulic conductivities and slopes of the leakage collection layer. 4.3 Surface Area of the Wetted Zone 4.3.1 Expressions for the Surface Area of the Wetted Zone The surface area of a parabola is given by the following equation: A=( 23 / ) WX (48) Table 3. Width of the wetted zone at a 20 m horizontal distance from a defect in the geomembrane primary liner for a 2% slope, W 20(2%) , and for a 1V:3H slope, W 20(1/3) . Rate of flow through the geomembrane defect Geonet t LCL =5mm k =1× 10 -1 m/s Leakage collection layer material Gravel t LCL = 300 mm k =1× 10 -1 m/s Sand t LCL = 300 mm k =1× 10 -3 m/s 10 lpd (1.16 × 10 -7 m 3 /s) Not full, t o W 20(2%) W 20(1/3) = 1.1 mm = 2.94 m = 0.74 m Not full, t o W 20(2%) W 20(1/3) = 1.1 mm = 2.94 m = 0.74 m Not full, t o W 20(2%) W 20(1/3) = 11 mm = 9.34 m = 2.33 m 100 lpd (1.16 × 10 -6 m 3 /s) Not full, t o W 20(2%) W 20(1/3) = 3.4 mm = 5.23 m = 1.31 m Not full, t o W 20(2%) W 20(1/3) = 3.4 mm = 5.23 m = 1.31 m Not full, t o W 20(2%) W 20(1/3) = 34 mm = 16.84 m = 4.15 m 1,000 lpd (1.16 × 10 -5 m 3 /s) Full, W 20(2%) W 20(1/3) t o =14mm = 10.70 m = 2.67 m Not full, t o W 20(2%) W 20(1/3) = 11 mm = 9.34 m = 2.33 m Not full, t o W 20(2%) W 20(1/3) = 108 mm = 31.24 m = 7.41 m 10,000 lpd (1.16 × 10 -4 m 3 /s) Full, W 20(2%) W 20(1/3) t o =118mm = 32.94 m = 7.77 m Not full, t o W 20(2%) W 20(1/3) = 34 mm = 16.84 m = 4.15 m Full, t o = 343 mm W 20(2%) = 62.28 m = 13.29 m W 20(1/3) Notes: The values of t o were calculated using Equation 10 (when the leakage collection layer is not full) or Equation 17 (when the leakage collection layer is full). Values of W 20 were calculated using Equation 36. They could have been obtained using Equation 41 (when the leakage collection layer is not full) or Equation 45 (when the leakage collection layer is full). The leakage collection layer is full when t o > t LCL (Equation 13). Units: lpd = liter per day = 1.16 × 10 -8 m 3 /s. 234 GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL S 1997, VOL. 4, NOS. 3-4
GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Leakage Collection Layers Due to Geomembrane Defects where: W = width of the base of the parabola; and X = distance between the vertex and the base. Therefore, from Equations 35 and 48, the surface area of the wetted zone, A w , between the vertex, V, and the horizontal line at the distance X from the vertex is: A w = 4 3 2to 32 / X sin b (49) The surface area of the wetted zone can also be expressed as follows by combining Equations 24, 36 and 48: A w F 2 to = H G I K J F + 3 sin b HG x 1 2 sin b t o I KJ 2 32 / However, as shown in Figure 8, Equations 49 and 50 are valid only if the following conditions are met: to L 2sinb £ to X L 2sinb £ £ Combining Equations 24 and 52 gives the following alternative expression for the condition expressed by Equation 52: (50) (51) (52) 0 £ x £ L - 2 t o sinb (53) If the two conditions expressed by Equations 51 and 52 (or 53, which is equivalent) are not met, the parabola is truncated (Figure 8). When the parabola is truncated (i.e. in the two cases illustrated in Figure 8), the surface area of the wetted zone is obtained by subtracting the surface area of the truncated portion from the surface area expressed by Equation 49. The resulting equation is: A w 4 to = X - ( X - L) 3 sinb 2 32 / 32 / (54) Combining Equations 24 and 54 gives: A w 2 F = H G 3 to sinb I LF + KJ 1 NM HG I F HG 2 3/ 2 3/ 2 2 x sin b 2( L - x) sinb - 1 - to KJ to It should be noted that Equations 54 and 55, which give the surface area of the truncated wetted zone, are valid under two different sets of conditions: S Set 1 (Figure 8a): I KJ O QP (55) GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL S 1997, VOL. 4, NOS. 3-4 235
- Page 1 and 2: Technical Paper by J.P. Giroud, B.A
- Page 3 and 4: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 5 and 6: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 7 and 8: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 9 and 10: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 11 and 12: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 13 and 14: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 15 and 16: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 17 and 18: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 19: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 23 and 24: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 25 and 26: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 27 and 28: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 29 and 30: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 31 and 32: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 33 and 34: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 35 and 36: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 37 and 38: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 39 and 40: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 41 and 42: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 43 and 44: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 45 and 46: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 47 and 48: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 49 and 50: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 51 and 52: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 53 and 54: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 55 and 56: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 57 and 58: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 59 and 60: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 61 and 62: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 63 and 64: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 65 and 66: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 67 and 68: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
- Page 69 and 70: GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Le
GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow <strong>in</strong> Leakage Collection Layers Due <strong>to</strong> Geomembrane Defects<br />
W<br />
max<br />
F<br />
HG<br />
tLCL<br />
Q<br />
= 1+<br />
1<br />
2<br />
s<strong>in</strong>b<br />
kt<br />
LCL<br />
L<br />
I<br />
+<br />
KJ N<br />
M<br />
t<br />
LCL<br />
4 L s<strong>in</strong>b<br />
F<br />
HG<br />
Q<br />
1 +<br />
2<br />
kt<br />
LCL<br />
O<br />
I<br />
KJ<br />
Q<br />
P<br />
12 /<br />
(47)<br />
4.2.5 Parametric Study<br />
Widths of wetted zones calculated us<strong>in</strong>g equations given <strong>in</strong> Section 4.2 are presented<br />
<strong>in</strong> Table 3. It appears that the width of the wetted zone <strong>in</strong>creases for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rates of<br />
<strong>flow</strong> through the geomembrane defect and for decreas<strong>in</strong>g hydraulic conductivities and<br />
slopes of the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer.<br />
4.3 Surface Area of the Wetted Zone<br />
4.3.1 Expressions for the Surface Area of the Wetted Zone<br />
The surface area of a parabola is given by the follow<strong>in</strong>g equation:<br />
A=( 23 / ) WX<br />
(48)<br />
Table 3. Width of the wetted zone at a 20 m horizontal distance from a defect <strong>in</strong> the<br />
geomembrane primary l<strong>in</strong>er for a 2% slope, W 20(2%) , and for a 1V:3H slope, W 20(1/3) .<br />
Rate of <strong>flow</strong><br />
through the<br />
geomembrane<br />
defect<br />
Geonet<br />
t LCL =5mm<br />
k =1× 10 -1 m/s<br />
Leakage <strong>collection</strong> layer material<br />
Gravel<br />
t LCL = 300 mm<br />
k =1× 10 -1 m/s<br />
Sand<br />
t LCL = 300 mm<br />
k =1× 10 -3 m/s<br />
10 lpd<br />
(1.16 × 10 -7 m 3 /s)<br />
Not full, t o<br />
W 20(2%)<br />
W 20(1/3)<br />
= 1.1 mm<br />
= 2.94 m<br />
= 0.74 m<br />
Not full, t o<br />
W 20(2%)<br />
W 20(1/3)<br />
= 1.1 mm<br />
= 2.94 m<br />
= 0.74 m<br />
Not full, t o<br />
W 20(2%)<br />
W 20(1/3)<br />
= 11 mm<br />
= 9.34 m<br />
= 2.33 m<br />
100 lpd<br />
(1.16 × 10 -6 m 3 /s)<br />
Not full, t o<br />
W 20(2%)<br />
W 20(1/3)<br />
= 3.4 mm<br />
= 5.23 m<br />
= 1.31 m<br />
Not full, t o<br />
W 20(2%)<br />
W 20(1/3)<br />
= 3.4 mm<br />
= 5.23 m<br />
= 1.31 m<br />
Not full, t o<br />
W 20(2%)<br />
W 20(1/3)<br />
= 34 mm<br />
= 16.84 m<br />
= 4.15 m<br />
1,000 lpd<br />
(1.16 × 10 -5 m 3 /s)<br />
Full,<br />
W 20(2%)<br />
W 20(1/3)<br />
t o =14mm<br />
= 10.70 m<br />
= 2.67 m<br />
Not full, t o<br />
W 20(2%)<br />
W 20(1/3)<br />
= 11 mm<br />
= 9.34 m<br />
= 2.33 m<br />
Not full, t o<br />
W 20(2%)<br />
W 20(1/3)<br />
= 108 mm<br />
= 31.24 m<br />
= 7.41 m<br />
10,000 lpd<br />
(1.16 × 10 -4 m 3 /s)<br />
Full,<br />
W 20(2%)<br />
W 20(1/3)<br />
t o =118mm<br />
= 32.94 m<br />
= 7.77 m<br />
Not full, t o<br />
W 20(2%)<br />
W 20(1/3)<br />
= 34 mm<br />
= 16.84 m<br />
= 4.15 m<br />
Full, t o = 343 mm<br />
W 20(2%) = 62.28 m<br />
= 13.29 m<br />
W 20(1/3)<br />
Notes: The values of t o were calculated us<strong>in</strong>g Equation 10 (when the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer is not full) or<br />
Equation 17 (when the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer is full). Values of W 20 were calculated us<strong>in</strong>g Equation 36. They<br />
could have been obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g Equation 41 (when the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer is not full) or Equation 45<br />
(when the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer is full). The <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer is full when t o > t LCL (Equation 13).<br />
Units: lpd = liter per day = 1.16 × 10 -8 m 3 /s.<br />
234 GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL S 1997, VOL. 4, NOS. 3-4