leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ...

leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ... leachate flow in leakage collection layers due to defects in ...

geosyntheticssociety.org
from geosyntheticssociety.org More from this publisher
14.11.2013 Views

GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Leakage Collection Layers Due to Geomembrane Defects 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Leakage Collection Layer Many landfills, especially those containing hazardous waste, are lined with a double liner system. This paper addresses the design of the drainage layer, called “leakage collection layer”, located between the two liners, i.e. the primary liner located above and the secondary liner located below the leakage collection layer. The purpose of the leakage collection layer is to collect the leachate that migrates (“leaks”) through the primary liner and to convey it toward collector pipes. The collector pipes then convey the leachate to a sump where it is removed from the landfill. The leakage collection layer also allows detection of liquid migrating (“leaking”) through the primary liner, and as a result it is also called “leakage detection and collection layer”. It should not be called “leak detection layer” since it does not detect individual leaks. 1.2 Leachate Flow 1.2.1 Description of the Flow To reach the leakage collection layer, leachate first flows through a defect in the primary liner (Figure 1a). In this paper the only mechanism of leachate migration through the primary liner that is considered is advective flow through defects in the liner. Phenomena such as permeation or diffusion of leachate or its constituents through a liner are not considered in this paper. Leachate flow is governed by the hydraulic gradient. After it has passed through a defect in the primary liner, the leachate flows more or less vertically through the leakage collection layer upper part, which is unsaturated (Figure 1a). When the leachate reaches the saturated part of the leakage collection layer, it flows downgradient, which for a small fraction of the leachate consists of first flowing upslope then turning gradually to flow downslope with the rest of the leachate (Figure 1b). As a result, the leachate flows only in a portion of the leakage collection layer called the wetted zone. The boundary of the wetted zone has approximately the shape of a parabola (Figure 1b), which will be demonstrated in Section 2.2. 1.2.2 Definition of the Two Cases, “Not Full” and “Full” The case described above and illustrated in Figure 1 is the usual case where the leachate phreatic surface in the leakage collection layer is not in contact with the primary liner. In this paper, this case is referred to as “the case where the leakage collection layer is not full”. The case where the leachate phreatic surface in the leakage collection layer is in contact with the primary liner is shown in Figure 2. In this paper, this case is referred to as the case where the leakage collection layer is full in a certain area around the primary liner defect, or more simply “the case where the leakage collection layer is full”. In this paper, both cases will be analyzed: the case where the leakage collection layer is not full and the case where the leakage collection layer is full. 216 GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL S 1997, VOL. 4, NOS. 3-4

GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow in Leakage Collection Layers Due to Geomembrane Defects (a) Leachate infiltration Waste Leachate phreatic surface in the leachate collection layer Leachate flow in the leachate collection layer Leachate phreatic surface in the leakage collection layer Leachate flow in the leakage collection layer Leachate collection layer Primary liner with defect Leakage collection layer Secondary liner Small fraction of leachate flowing upslope (b) Secondary liner Boundary of the wetted zone Wetted zone Defect in the primary liner Leachate flow in the leakage collection layer Figure 1. Leachate flow in the leachate collection layer, through a defect in the primary liner, and in the leakage collection layer in the case where the leakage collection layer is not filled with leachate: (a) cross section; (b) plan view of the secondary liner. 1.3 Scope of the Paper The paper presents a theoretical analysis of the flow in the leakage collection layer resulting from a leak through a defect in the primary liner. The resulting equations make it possible to size leakage collection layers. The analysis also provides the size of the GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL S 1997, VOL. 4, NOS. 3-4 217

GIROUD et al. D Leachate Flow <strong>in</strong> Leakage Collection Layers Due <strong>to</strong> Geomembrane Defects<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

1.1 Leakage Collection Layer<br />

Many landfills, especially those conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g hazardous waste, are l<strong>in</strong>ed with a double<br />

l<strong>in</strong>er system. This paper addresses the design of the dra<strong>in</strong>age layer, called “<strong>leakage</strong><br />

<strong>collection</strong> layer”, located between the two l<strong>in</strong>ers, i.e. the primary l<strong>in</strong>er located above<br />

and the secondary l<strong>in</strong>er located below the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer. The purpose of the<br />

<strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer is <strong>to</strong> collect the <strong>leachate</strong> that migrates (“leaks”) through the<br />

primary l<strong>in</strong>er and <strong>to</strong> convey it <strong>to</strong>ward collec<strong>to</strong>r pipes. The collec<strong>to</strong>r pipes then convey<br />

the <strong>leachate</strong> <strong>to</strong> a sump where it is removed from the landfill. The <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer<br />

also allows detection of liquid migrat<strong>in</strong>g (“leak<strong>in</strong>g”) through the primary l<strong>in</strong>er, and<br />

as a result it is also called “<strong>leakage</strong> detection and <strong>collection</strong> layer”. It should not be<br />

called “leak detection layer” s<strong>in</strong>ce it does not detect <strong>in</strong>dividual leaks.<br />

1.2 Leachate Flow<br />

1.2.1 Description of the Flow<br />

To reach the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer, <strong>leachate</strong> first <strong>flow</strong>s through a defect <strong>in</strong> the primary<br />

l<strong>in</strong>er (Figure 1a). In this paper the only mechanism of <strong>leachate</strong> migration through<br />

the primary l<strong>in</strong>er that is considered is advective <strong>flow</strong> through <strong>defects</strong> <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>er. Phenomena<br />

such as permeation or diffusion of <strong>leachate</strong> or its constituents through a l<strong>in</strong>er<br />

are not considered <strong>in</strong> this paper.<br />

Leachate <strong>flow</strong> is governed by the hydraulic gradient. After it has passed through a<br />

defect <strong>in</strong> the primary l<strong>in</strong>er, the <strong>leachate</strong> <strong>flow</strong>s more or less vertically through the <strong>leakage</strong><br />

<strong>collection</strong> layer upper part, which is unsaturated (Figure 1a). When the <strong>leachate</strong> reaches<br />

the saturated part of the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer, it <strong>flow</strong>s downgradient, which for a<br />

small fraction of the <strong>leachate</strong> consists of first <strong>flow</strong><strong>in</strong>g upslope then turn<strong>in</strong>g gradually<br />

<strong>to</strong> <strong>flow</strong> downslope with the rest of the <strong>leachate</strong> (Figure 1b). As a result, the <strong>leachate</strong><br />

<strong>flow</strong>s only <strong>in</strong> a portion of the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer called the wetted zone. The<br />

boundary of the wetted zone has approximately the shape of a parabola (Figure 1b),<br />

which will be demonstrated <strong>in</strong> Section 2.2.<br />

1.2.2 Def<strong>in</strong>ition of the Two Cases, “Not Full” and “Full”<br />

The case described above and illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 1 is the usual case where the <strong>leachate</strong><br />

phreatic surface <strong>in</strong> the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer is not <strong>in</strong> contact with the primary<br />

l<strong>in</strong>er. In this paper, this case is referred <strong>to</strong> as “the case where the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer<br />

is not full”. The case where the <strong>leachate</strong> phreatic surface <strong>in</strong> the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer<br />

is <strong>in</strong> contact with the primary l<strong>in</strong>er is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2. In this paper, this case is referred<br />

<strong>to</strong> as the case where the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer is full <strong>in</strong> a certa<strong>in</strong> area around<br />

the primary l<strong>in</strong>er defect, or more simply “the case where the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer<br />

is full”. In this paper, both cases will be analyzed: the case where the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong><br />

layer is not full and the case where the <strong>leakage</strong> <strong>collection</strong> layer is full.<br />

216 GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL S 1997, VOL. 4, NOS. 3-4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!