14.11.2013 Views

Taiping Zhang – Processing of the BSRN Data and its ... - GEWEX

Taiping Zhang – Processing of the BSRN Data and its ... - GEWEX

Taiping Zhang – Processing of the BSRN Data and its ... - GEWEX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Taiping</strong> <strong>Zhang</strong> 1 , Paul W. Stackhouse, Jr. 2 , Shashi K. Gupta 1 ,<br />

Stephen J. Cox 1 , J. Colleen Mikovitz 1<br />

1. SSAI / NASA Langley Research Center !<br />

Hampton, Virginia, USA !<br />

2. NASA Langley Research Center!<br />

Hampton, Virginia, USA!<br />

The 12 th Biennial <strong>BSRN</strong> Scientific Review <strong>and</strong> Workshop<br />

01-03 August, 2012 Potsdam, Germany


Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> original <strong>BSRN</strong> data before<br />

<strong>and</strong> after quality check;<br />

<strong>Processing</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data to generate<br />

3-hourly, 3-hourly-monthly, daily <strong>and</strong><br />

monthly means;<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> processed data in<br />

validating <strong>the</strong> <strong>GEWEX</strong> SRB(V3.0) data;<br />

Trend analysis;<br />

Conclusions.<br />

2


Quality Flags for <strong>the</strong> <strong>BSRN</strong> <strong>Data</strong>:<br />

01. Physically possible limit <strong>of</strong> G 1 (Global 1, or DIR+DIF);<br />

02. Extremely rare lim<strong>its</strong> <strong>of</strong> G 1 ;<br />

03. Physically possible limit <strong>of</strong> I DIR (DIRECT SW) radiation;<br />

04. Extremely rare lim<strong>its</strong> <strong>of</strong> I DIR radiation;<br />

05. Physically possible limit <strong>of</strong> I DIF (DIFFUSE) radiation;<br />

06. Extremely rare lim<strong>its</strong> <strong>of</strong> I DIF radiation;<br />

07. Physically possible limit <strong>of</strong> I LW (DOWNWARD LW) radiation;<br />

08. Extremely rare lim<strong>its</strong> <strong>of</strong> I LW radiation;<br />

09. Comparison <strong>of</strong> G 1 <strong>and</strong> G 2 (Global 2) ;<br />

10. Comparison between I DIF <strong>and</strong> G 1 radiation;<br />

11. I LW to AIR TEMPERATURE comparison.<br />

The values <strong>and</strong> meanings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Quality Flags are as<br />

follows:<br />

• 2: Suspected to be erroneous;<br />

• 5: Cannot be performed;<br />

• 9: Passed <strong>the</strong> procedure.


Logical Procedure to Reject “Bad” Values:<br />

• If ei<strong>the</strong>r Flag 01 or Flag 02 has value “2”, <strong>the</strong>n G 1 is rejected;<br />

• If ei<strong>the</strong>r Flag 03 or Flag 04 has value “2”, <strong>the</strong>n I DIR <strong>and</strong> G 1 are rejected;<br />

• If ei<strong>the</strong>r Flag 05 or Flag 06 has value “2”, <strong>the</strong>n I DIF <strong>and</strong> G 1 are rejected;<br />

• If ei<strong>the</strong>r Flag 07 or Flag 08 or Flag 11 has value “2”, <strong>the</strong>n I LW is rejected;<br />

• If Flag 09 has value “2” <strong>and</strong> G 1 >0, <strong>the</strong>n G 2 is rejected;<br />

• If Flag 10 has value “2”, <strong>the</strong>n I DIF <strong>and</strong> G 1 are rejected.<br />

8


15-Minute Mean: requiring at least 1 x-minute value;<br />

Hourly Mean: from 4 valid 15-minute means;<br />

Hourly-Monthly Mean: requiring at least 1 day with<br />

valid hourly mean for <strong>the</strong> corresponding hour;<br />

3-Hourly Mean: from 3 valid hourly means;<br />

3-Hourly-Monthly Mean: requiring at least 1 day with<br />

valid 3-hourly mean for <strong>the</strong> corresponding time;<br />

Daily Mean: from hourly means, with up to 5 or 12 hours<br />

<strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r cosine or linear interpolations depending on <strong>the</strong><br />

variable <strong>and</strong> latitude;<br />

Monthly Mean: i.) from daily means, requiring at least 1<br />

daily mean in <strong>the</strong> month; ii.) from 24 valid hourly-monthly<br />

means.<br />

12


Daily Mean<br />

14


Monthly Mean<br />

15


Bias<br />

(W m -2 )<br />

RMS<br />

(W m -2 )<br />

σ<br />

(Wm -2 )<br />

ρ<br />

N<br />

G 1<br />

-6.99 88.32 88.05 0.9475 597867<br />

G 2<br />

-4.39 88.13 88.02 0.9474 697862<br />

Blended -4.96 88.38 88.24 0.9465 716742<br />

17


SRB(V3.0)-<strong>BSRN</strong> SW Daily <strong>and</strong> Monthly Mean Comparisons<br />

Daily<br />

Monthly<br />

22


SRB(V3.0)-<strong>BSRN</strong> LW Daily <strong>and</strong> Monthly Mean Comparisons<br />

Daily<br />

Monthly<br />

23


<strong>GEWEX</strong> SRB(V3.0)-<strong>BSRN</strong> Comparison<br />

Bias/(RMS) from 1992-01 to 2007-12!<br />

<strong>BSRN</strong> SW G 1 Used with <strong>the</strong> Laxest Availability Control!<br />

Model<br />

3-Hourly<br />

(W m -2 )<br />

Daily<br />

(W m -2 )<br />

3-Hourly-<br />

Monthly<br />

(W m -2 )<br />

Monthly<br />

(W m -2 )<br />

<strong>GEWEX</strong> SRB<br />

GSW(V3.0)<br />

-6.99<br />

(88.32)<br />

-3.58<br />

(35.50)<br />

-8.81<br />

(47.43)<br />

-5.22<br />

(23.34)<br />

<strong>GEWEX</strong> SRB<br />

GLW(V3.0)<br />

1.25<br />

(30.50)<br />

1.13<br />

(22.16)<br />

0.89<br />

(13.75)<br />

0.97<br />

(11.18)<br />

<strong>BSRN</strong> data from http://bsrn.awi.de/ as <strong>of</strong> 2011-08-22.


Dependence on Choice <strong>of</strong> Time Period<br />

<strong>BSRN</strong><br />

SRB<br />

References<br />

• Wea<strong>the</strong>rhead, E.C. et al., 1998. JGR, 103(D14), 17,149-17,161.<br />

• Hinkelman, L.M., et al., 2009. JGR, 114, D00D20, doi:10.1029/2008JD011004.<br />

• Liebmann, B., 2010. BAMS, November, 2010, 1485-1491.<br />

27


Dependence on Choice <strong>of</strong> Time Period<br />

Positive Trend<br />

<strong>BSRN</strong><br />

SRB<br />

28


Dependence on Choice <strong>of</strong> Time Period<br />

Negative Trend<br />

<strong>BSRN</strong><br />

SRB<br />

29


As <strong>of</strong> August 2011, <strong>the</strong>re are 5969 site-months <strong>of</strong> <strong>BSRN</strong><br />

data in archive from 48 <strong>of</strong> 52 <strong>BSRN</strong> sites, spanning a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> 19 years <strong>and</strong> 7 months beginning from January,<br />

1992;<br />

<br />

Quality-flags are produced based on <strong>the</strong> methodology by<br />

ETH <strong>and</strong> Long <strong>and</strong> Shi (2008). About 4% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> original<br />

records are rejected through quality-check;<br />

<br />

About 25% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sites show G 2 -G 1 RMS errors above 25 up<br />

to 54 Wm -2 . After quality check, all but one RMS errors<br />

reduce to below 20 Wm -2 . The G 2 -G 1 bias error change is<br />

not as dramatic except for ILO, FLO <strong>and</strong> DAA;<br />

<br />

The site ILO has problems with G 1 , but <strong>its</strong> G 2 <strong>and</strong> longwave<br />

values appear to be normal, as <strong>the</strong>y agree with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

<strong>GEWEX</strong> SRB counterparts reasonably well;<br />

30


SYO <strong>and</strong> GVN tend to be outliers in <strong>the</strong> SRB-<strong>BSRN</strong> shortwave<br />

comparisons. This might be resulted from <strong>the</strong> questionable satellitebased<br />

cloud identification over <strong>the</strong> snow-covered Antarctica;<br />

The G 2 values at NYA, PAY, KWA, GVN <strong>and</strong> SPO are continuously<br />

available for a 15-year period from 1993-01 to 2007-12. The<br />

Wea<strong>the</strong>rhead et al. (1998) method was used to determine <strong>the</strong> 95%<br />

confidence intervals <strong>of</strong> trends <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se sites <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir ensemble<br />

average. The chosen time period for <strong>the</strong> trend detection ranges from<br />

2 to 15 years. Over <strong>the</strong> 15-year period, <strong>the</strong> <strong>BSRN</strong> ensemble average<br />

shows no significant positive or negative trend, but <strong>its</strong> SRB<br />

counterpart shows a negative trend <strong>of</strong> very small magnitude.<br />

Considering <strong>the</strong> uncertainties in <strong>the</strong> SRB data, no conclusions can<br />

be made about <strong>the</strong>se trends.<br />

31


For More Information about <strong>GEWEX</strong> SRB:<br />

http://gewex-srb.larc.nasa.gov<br />

<strong>Taiping</strong>.<strong>Zhang</strong>@NASA.gov<br />

The 12 th Biennial <strong>BSRN</strong> Scientific Review <strong>and</strong> Workshop!<br />

01-03 August, 2012. Potsdam, Germany

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!