14.11.2013 Views

Quantitative paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatic reconstruction ...

Quantitative paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatic reconstruction ...

Quantitative paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatic reconstruction ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ARTICLE IN PRESS<br />

40 N.D. Sheldon, N.J. Tabor / Earth-Science Reviews xxx (2009) xxx–xxx<br />

Fig. 22. Cross plot of estimated temperatures of kaolinite crystallization versus paleolatitudes of the paleosol profiles from which kaolinte samples were taken. Negative <strong>and</strong> positive<br />

values of latitude indicate positions in the southern <strong>and</strong> northern hemisphere, respectively. Paleolatitudes were determined using the “Point Tracker (v. 4) for Window” software<br />

package (developed by C.R. Scotese). Thick black line is the best-fit curve for mean annual surface air temperatures for weather station below 100 m above sea level in the<br />

International Atomic Energy Association database (Rozanski et al., 1993). Thin dashed lines represent the ±1s among the mean values for surface air temperatures. Temperature<br />

estimates for kaolinite crystallization are based upon published δ 18 O <strong>and</strong> δD values (Sheppard, 1977; Hassanipak <strong>and</strong> Eslinger, 1985; Bird <strong>and</strong> Chivas, 1989; Lawrence <strong>and</strong> Rashkes<br />

Meaux, 1993; Mizota <strong>and</strong> Longstaffe, 1996; Boulvais et al., 2000) <strong>and</strong> are depicted as follows: green dots=Cretaceous, blue dots=Paleocene, red dots=Eocene, orange<br />

dots=Oligocene, yellow dots=Miocene. Ages for kaolinite samples are generally poorly known, <strong>and</strong> only kaolinite samples that are known to be limited to an Epoch are shown for<br />

Cenozoic data points. All Cretaceous samples are Campian or Maastrichtian. Temperature estimates are no better than ±3 °C. See text. (For interpretation of the references to colour<br />

in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)<br />

has not likely changed by more than 0.1‰ (e.g., Yurtsever <strong>and</strong> Gat,<br />

1981) <strong>and</strong>, while the intercept of the meteoric water line is susceptible<br />

to variation that is principally related to humidity of air masses over<br />

the low-latitude tropics, it is unlikely that such changes will result in<br />

paleotemperature estimates that differ by more than ±2 °C (Delgado<br />

<strong>and</strong> Reyes,1996). In addition, evaporation of water from the soil profile<br />

will drive soil water δ 18 O <strong>and</strong> δD values to the right of the meteoric<br />

water line (Rozanski et al., 1993). Therefore, kaolinite which forms in<br />

equilibrium with soil waters that are offset from the meteoric water<br />

line through evaporation can result in significant overestimates of<br />

paleotemperature.<br />

7.5.4. Mineral-pair δ 18 O values<br />

If two (or more) co-existing soil minerals form in chemical equilibrium,<br />

then differences in the δ 18 O values of those two (or more)<br />

minerals may provide an estimate of temperature at the time of<br />

mineral co-precipitation. Paleotemperature estimates that are based<br />

on mineral-pair δ 18 O values have a significant advantage over paleotemperature<br />

estimates that are based upon single-mineral δ 18 O <strong>and</strong><br />

δD values, in that the isotopic composition of soil water from which<br />

the minerals are derived is not important, <strong>and</strong> it is unnecessary to<br />

assume that soil water δ 18 O <strong>and</strong> δD values lie upon the meteoric water<br />

line of Craig (1961).<br />

There are only a few examples of paleotemperature estimates<br />

based on oxygen-isotope mineral pairs from pedogenic minerals. Yapp<br />

(1993b) estimated a paleotemperature of 23±4 °C from a phosphate–<br />

goethite pair in Late Ordivician oolitic ironstone from the Neda fm.,<br />

Wisconsin, USA. Yapp (1998) estimated a paleotemperature of 32±<br />

4 °C from a kaolinite–goethite pair in Early Jurassic oolitic ironstone<br />

from Israel. Tabor (2007) estimated paleotemperatures from hematite–phyllosilicate<br />

pairs at five different stratigraphic horizons in<br />

Upper Pennsylvanian <strong>and</strong> Lower Permian paleosol profiles from Texas,<br />

USA. These hematite–phyllosilicate oxygen-isotope pairs indicate<br />

warming from relatively cool (24±3 °C) soil temperatures in the<br />

Late Pennsylvanian to warmer soil temperatures (25 to 37±3 °C) in<br />

the Early Permian. To date, all mineral-pair estimates of paleotemperature<br />

come from analysis of paleosol minerals that formed at lowlatitude,<br />

tropical sites. Therefore, it is likely that these paleotemperature<br />

estimates reflect mean annual surface-air temperatures, rather<br />

than warm-season averages (see discussion of this in Section 7.5.3.3).<br />

As mentioned above, oxygen isotope mineral-pair paleotemperature<br />

estimates are not sensitive to the isotopic composition of soil<br />

water from which the minerals co-precipitate. The temperature estimate<br />

provided by this proxy, however, does permit estimation of soil<br />

water δ 18 O values. In the instances for the Late Ordovician <strong>and</strong> Early<br />

Jurassic examples provided in Yapp (1993b, 1998), estimated soil<br />

water δ 18 O values are ~−7.0‰. For the Late Carboniferous <strong>and</strong> Early<br />

Permian examples, estimated soil water δ 18 O values range from<br />

−3.8‰ to −4.9‰. In addition, within analytical uncertainty, paleotemperature<br />

estimates from Upper Carboniferous <strong>and</strong> Lower Permian<br />

hematite-phyllosilicate mineral pairs are indistinguishable from<br />

single mineral paleotemperature estimates that are based upon δ 18 O<br />

<strong>and</strong> δD values from paleopedogenic phyllosilicates. This represents a<br />

rare instance in which a persuasive case can be made for (1) lowtemperature<br />

chemical equilibrium <strong>and</strong> (2) demonstration that very<br />

ancient soil water δ 18 O <strong>and</strong> δD values lie upon, or very near, those<br />

defined by the modern meteoric water line (Craig, 1961).<br />

7.6. Paleo-vegetation/paleo-photosynthesis<br />

An additional application of isotope geochemistry in paleosols is to<br />

reconstruct past vegetative cover by estimation of the ratio of plants<br />

using C 3 <strong>and</strong> C 4 photosynthetic pathways (e.g., Quade et al., 1989,<br />

1994; Cerling, 1992; Cerling <strong>and</strong> Quade, 1993; Cerling et al., 1993;<br />

Kingston et al., 1994; Latorre et al., 1997; Fox <strong>and</strong> Koch, 2003, 2004).<br />

The topic was recently reviewed by Tipple <strong>and</strong> Pagani (2007), so<br />

readers seeking a comprehensive review of this subject are directed<br />

there. However, a short review of the approach is appropriate here<br />

before we discuss some of the applications <strong>and</strong> results.<br />

C 3 photosynthesis (Calvin–Benson) is the earliest developed photosynthetic<br />

pathway that is used by terrestrial plants. CO 2 diffuses into<br />

the plant <strong>and</strong> after a number of intermediate steps involving ribulose<br />

Please cite this article as: Sheldon, N.D., Tabor, N.J., <strong>Quantitative</strong> <strong>paleoenvironmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>paleoclimatic</strong> <strong>reconstruction</strong> using paleosols, Earth-<br />

Science Reviews (2009), doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.03.004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!