13.11.2013 Views

The Comparison of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of

The Comparison of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of

The Comparison of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

63 rd Annual Assembly & International Conference <strong>of</strong> the International Institute <strong>of</strong> Welding<br />

11-17 July 2010, Istanbul, Turkey<br />

AWST-10/100<br />

Figure 4. <strong>The</strong> top side <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the FCWs<br />

4. Results <strong>and</strong> Discussion<br />

Figure 2b. Test specimens<br />

Table 2. Chemical compositions <strong>of</strong> the weld metals <strong>and</strong> base metal<br />

Elements<br />

Base<br />

Metal<br />

G<br />

Wire<br />

K<br />

Wire<br />

Wt. (%)<br />

Rutile<br />

S<br />

Wire<br />

E<br />

Wire<br />

Metal Basic<br />

M<br />

Wire<br />

B<br />

Wire<br />

C 0.162 0.039 0.034 0.031 0.05 0.048 0.071<br />

Si 0.293 0.428 0.73 0.39 0.51 0.589 0.55<br />

Mn 1.37 1.29 1.28 1.09 1.22 1.35 1.464<br />

S 0.0045 0.003 0.0074 0.003 0.02 0.024 0.010<br />

Cr 0.041 0.024 0.024 0.021 0.03 0.021 0.030<br />

Mo 0.013 - 0.0038 - 0.04 - 0.013<br />

Cu 0.049 0.035 0.0271 0.068 0.02 0.061 0.060<br />

V 0.0768 0.015 0.0216 0.014 0.02 - 0.006<br />

Ni 0.04 0.009 0.057 0.192 0.46 0.007 0.040<br />

Fe 97.922 98.163 97.863 98.18 97.63 99.25 98.25<br />

<strong>The</strong> mechanical <strong>and</strong> microstructural properties (tensile,<br />

impact toughness, bending, microhardness <strong>and</strong><br />

micrography studies) <strong>of</strong> FCWs were tested on butt-weld<br />

metal. Test temperature has been chosen to be 20º C.<br />

<strong>The</strong> tensile strength, bending, micro hardness <strong>and</strong> impact<br />

toughness results from the butt-weld test can be seen in<br />

Table 3.<br />

Table 3. <strong>Mechanical</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> the weld metals<br />

FCW Types<br />

Rutile<br />

Basic<br />

Metal<br />

Tensile<br />

Strength<br />

(MPa)<br />

Bend<br />

Test<br />

G<br />

wire 581 Ok<br />

K<br />

wire 550 Ok<br />

S<br />

Wire 550 Ok<br />

E<br />

Wire 551 Ok<br />

B<br />

wire 603 Ok<br />

M<br />

wire 513 Ok<br />

Impact<br />

Energy (J)<br />

20ºC - 20ºC<br />

80<br />

110<br />

122<br />

46<br />

61<br />

77<br />

85<br />

108<br />

132<br />

94<br />

104<br />

108<br />

158<br />

159<br />

166<br />

126<br />

132<br />

144<br />

32<br />

34<br />

80<br />

14<br />

18<br />

21<br />

32<br />

40<br />

46<br />

22<br />

30<br />

36<br />

88<br />

106<br />

110<br />

63<br />

71<br />

80<br />

Micro<br />

hardness<br />

(Hv)<br />

255<br />

258<br />

287<br />

306<br />

268<br />

272<br />

<strong>The</strong> microstructures <strong>of</strong> the welding materials were<br />

examined by Optical Microscope after polishing <strong>and</strong><br />

etching with Nital 10%. Figure 5 shows the<br />

macrostructure <strong>of</strong> G wire with 500 magnifications (50X).<br />

Figure 6 a, b, c, d, e, f show the microstructure <strong>of</strong> rutile,<br />

basic <strong>and</strong> metal FCWs.<br />

Figure 3. Experimental setup by using semi-automatic welding<br />

procedure<br />

During the welding, the voltage was held at 30 V. A<br />

constant wire-feeding rate <strong>of</strong> 8,5 m/min was maintained<br />

for all the welds .<strong>The</strong> welding current was in the range <strong>of</strong><br />

240-250 A. 170-190 A, 23 V <strong>and</strong> 5,5 m/min wire speed<br />

were used for the root passes. Top weld <strong>of</strong> the basic<br />

FCW is shown in Figure 4.<br />

Figure 5. <strong>The</strong> cross-section <strong>of</strong> the weld joints i.e. G wire<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!