Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
94<br />
gathers riches by making others miserable.” 41 “Riches cannot<br />
be gathered without sin but these do not keep company after<br />
death.” 42 And it was Guru Nanak who introduced the practice<br />
<strong>of</strong> ‘Langar’ and ‘Pangat’ i.e. eating the same food while sitting<br />
together. Fair distribution <strong>of</strong> wealth among men is the<br />
inevitable inference from the basic experience <strong>of</strong> God is Love.<br />
The ideas <strong>of</strong> the brotherhood <strong>of</strong> man, the acceptance <strong>of</strong><br />
householder’s and social responsibilities, the consequent<br />
necessity <strong>of</strong> work and <strong>of</strong> the fair distribution <strong>of</strong> wealth and<br />
human production are so logically connected that these cannot<br />
be dislinked or accepted partly.<br />
12. Participation in all walks <strong>of</strong> life<br />
Once the love <strong>of</strong> man becomes the fundamental<br />
principle <strong>of</strong> religious life, the involvement <strong>of</strong> the spiritual<br />
person in all walks <strong>of</strong> life becomes inescapable. In fact, total<br />
responsibility towards all beings is only the other side <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Coin <strong>of</strong> Love. In whatever field there is encroachment on<br />
human interests, reaction and response from the spiritual person<br />
becomes a religious duty. Otherwise the idea <strong>of</strong> the<br />
brotherhood <strong>of</strong> man becomes meaningless. It is in this context<br />
that we should understand the bold and loud criticism <strong>of</strong> Guru<br />
Nanak <strong>of</strong> the evil practices and institutions <strong>of</strong> his day. No<br />
inhuman practice remained unexposed. He criticised the<br />
tyranny and barbarity <strong>of</strong> the invaders and the oppression and<br />
brutality <strong>of</strong> the rulers, the corruption and cruelty <strong>of</strong> the<br />
administration and the <strong>of</strong>ficials, the degrading inhumanity <strong>of</strong><br />
the caste ideology and the underlying idea <strong>of</strong> pollution, the<br />
naked greed and rank hypocrisy <strong>of</strong> the Brahmins and Muslim<br />
Mullahs, the rapacity <strong>of</strong> the rich in amassing wealth the idleness<br />
<strong>of</strong> Yogis and mendicants, and other wrong practices. There<br />
was hardly any evil aspect <strong>of</strong> life that escaped his criticism.<br />
All this criticism meant only one thing, namely, that there was<br />
a right or religious way <strong>of</strong> doing things that were being<br />
misconducted and that no walk <strong>of</strong> life was taboo for the<br />
religious man. In whatever field <strong>of</strong>