Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
72<br />
this attempt, one Harnam Dass was very happy at the<br />
publication. He calls it a good work <strong>of</strong> research by which he<br />
was greately influenced, impressed, and thereby encouraged.<br />
He writes that he was emboldened to persue the kind <strong>of</strong><br />
research made by G.B. Singh. The cat is out <strong>of</strong> bag when<br />
Harnam Dass writes that Britishers, like Macauliffe, had their<br />
own axe to grind and they wanted to create differences between<br />
Hindus and <strong>Sikh</strong>s by preaching that there were two separate<br />
communities and faiths. 94 We have seen that G.B.Singh’s views<br />
are neither based on correct facts nor on good sense. Evidently,<br />
a scholar who is neither willing to examine closely the available<br />
material about which he was writing, nor was inclined to stick<br />
to known facts, nor exhibited any regard for truth or reason,<br />
and makes baseless attacks on the foundations <strong>of</strong> a religion,<br />
could be motivated only by consideration, that were neither<br />
academic, nor moral. The very fact that his views have been<br />
found to be perverse and poisonous by a person like Jodh Singh,<br />
and in contrast have been welcomed by persons like Harnam<br />
Dass, who are not willing to accept even the independent<br />
identity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Sikh</strong> religion, makes very clear the destructive<br />
direction <strong>of</strong> the work <strong>of</strong> G.B. Singh. The work <strong>of</strong> Jodh Singh<br />
exposed not only the crude attempt <strong>of</strong> G.B. Singh but gave a<br />
coup de grace to his views. It is not an accident that in 1975 we<br />
find that Mcleod has tried to suggest or repeat the very<br />
assertions made by G.B. Singh, namely, that there is no authentic<br />
Adi-Granth, the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> is not the Adi-Granth got written<br />
by the fifth Guru and that the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> is a copy <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Banno <strong>Bir</strong>, or a copy <strong>of</strong> its copy; and that the additional hymns<br />
found in the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> had been copied in the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong><br />
but were later deleted by hartal. All we wish to state is that the<br />
thesis propounded and the method used by Mcleod were<br />
similar to those <strong>of</strong> G.B. Singh, since, without an attempt at<br />
verification, incorrect suggestions were made about known<br />
facts regarding