Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
66<br />
additional eight lines otherwise the very need <strong>of</strong> this<br />
interpolation made later than B.K. 1699 would not have arisen.<br />
In fact, Pritam Singh’s argument about the loss <strong>of</strong> the real Banno<br />
<strong>Bir</strong> is self contradictory. On the one hand he cites the features<br />
<strong>of</strong> Bl from the examination <strong>of</strong> G.B. Singh made as recently as<br />
in the midforties. On the other hand, he builds his argument<br />
about the suggested loss <strong>of</strong> the cover only <strong>of</strong> which its present<br />
custodians have even no clear recollection or inkling. It is<br />
unthinkable that the real Banno <strong>Bir</strong> should have disappeared<br />
after midforties, but neither the custodians <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bir</strong> nor the<br />
<strong>Sikh</strong> world should have been aware <strong>of</strong> it. The very fact that<br />
the custodians <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Bir</strong> have tried to change the year <strong>of</strong><br />
production from 1699 to 1659, and the fact that Tatkara <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>Bir</strong> refers to the Nishan <strong>of</strong> the 6th Guru and not to that <strong>of</strong><br />
the fifth Guru, clearly, show that the <strong>Bir</strong> is without doubt the<br />
original Banno <strong>Bir</strong>, but that the stories woven round the year<br />
and the circumstances <strong>of</strong> its production are unreliable and are<br />
obviously meant to camouflage its reality. It might be<br />
questioned as to why the year <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> the Banno <strong>Bir</strong><br />
was changed to 1659 when no historian has ever asserted that<br />
the 5th Guru completed the Adi-Granth in that year. The reason<br />
for it is obvious. 1659 is the only year which with the least<br />
effort at alteration could be changed from 1699 to 1659 as it is<br />
a year close to the year <strong>of</strong> the production <strong>of</strong> the Adi-Granth<br />
and the very minor alteration involved as such stood the least<br />
chance <strong>of</strong> detection.<br />
We have found that the both Mcleod and G.B. Singh<br />
have suggestively used the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> as a lever to shake the<br />
authenticity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong>. So far as Mcleod is<br />
concerned, he has tried to remain blissfully quiet or ignorant<br />
about the factual position <strong>of</strong> the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> and has like G.B.<br />
Singh blindly used the same as a weapon to attack the<br />
authenticity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong>, little realising that the weapon<br />
he was wielding had only a phantom existence. But,