13.11.2013 Views

Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies

Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies

Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

48<br />

were recorded or obtained in relation to the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> or to<br />

authenticate the same, especially when the Nishan <strong>of</strong> the 5th<br />

Guru does not even find mention in the Tatkara. In fact, the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> the mention <strong>of</strong> the Nishan <strong>of</strong> the fifth Guru clearly<br />

demolishes the Banno story which asserts that the 5th Guru<br />

put his Nishan on the Banno <strong>Bir</strong>. The Nishan <strong>of</strong> the 6th Guru<br />

does find mention in the Tatkara, but folios on both sides <strong>of</strong><br />

this Nishan are missing, suggesting its subsequent introduction<br />

in the <strong>Bir</strong>. This Nishan can at best only suggest the period <strong>of</strong><br />

the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> to be 1699, since the absence <strong>of</strong> the mention <strong>of</strong><br />

the Nishan <strong>of</strong> the 5th Guru in the Tatkara clearly show’s that<br />

the <strong>Bir</strong> could never have been written near 1604 or even in the<br />

period <strong>of</strong> the 5th Guru. As such, the year <strong>of</strong> writing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Banno <strong>Bir</strong> is 1699 and the mention <strong>of</strong> the Nishan <strong>of</strong> only the<br />

6th Guru in the Tatkara also confirms that. Rather, 1699 as<br />

the year <strong>of</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> is alone congruous<br />

with the mention <strong>of</strong> the Nishan <strong>of</strong> the 6th Guru in the Tatkara,<br />

Samat 1701 being the year <strong>of</strong> the demise <strong>of</strong> the sixth Guru.<br />

Giani Mahan Singh has given many reasons for believing that<br />

the year <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> is Sam at 1699 and not<br />

1661. He finds that the <strong>Bir</strong> is not written in any hurry. His<br />

examination also shows that the various totals <strong>of</strong> Sabads which<br />

in the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> are either not given, or are many times<br />

given above or between the lines, are correctly given in the<br />

Banno <strong>Bir</strong> and stand recorded in the lines themselves. Besides,<br />

the story <strong>of</strong> many copyists having copied out the Granth is<br />

not correct, because the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> has been written by only 2/<br />

3 persons according to Giani Mahan Singh, 66 one person<br />

according to the University scholars and not more than 5<br />

persons according to Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pritam Singh. 67<br />

It is, thus, clear that the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> was written in Samat<br />

1699 and the story <strong>of</strong> many or twelve scribes having written it<br />

in Samat 1661 is incorrect and untenable. The theory <strong>of</strong> Banno<br />

<strong>Bir</strong> being original, or even the first copy <strong>of</strong> the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!