Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
48<br />
were recorded or obtained in relation to the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> or to<br />
authenticate the same, especially when the Nishan <strong>of</strong> the 5th<br />
Guru does not even find mention in the Tatkara. In fact, the<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> the mention <strong>of</strong> the Nishan <strong>of</strong> the fifth Guru clearly<br />
demolishes the Banno story which asserts that the 5th Guru<br />
put his Nishan on the Banno <strong>Bir</strong>. The Nishan <strong>of</strong> the 6th Guru<br />
does find mention in the Tatkara, but folios on both sides <strong>of</strong><br />
this Nishan are missing, suggesting its subsequent introduction<br />
in the <strong>Bir</strong>. This Nishan can at best only suggest the period <strong>of</strong><br />
the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> to be 1699, since the absence <strong>of</strong> the mention <strong>of</strong><br />
the Nishan <strong>of</strong> the 5th Guru in the Tatkara clearly show’s that<br />
the <strong>Bir</strong> could never have been written near 1604 or even in the<br />
period <strong>of</strong> the 5th Guru. As such, the year <strong>of</strong> writing <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Banno <strong>Bir</strong> is 1699 and the mention <strong>of</strong> the Nishan <strong>of</strong> only the<br />
6th Guru in the Tatkara also confirms that. Rather, 1699 as<br />
the year <strong>of</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> is alone congruous<br />
with the mention <strong>of</strong> the Nishan <strong>of</strong> the 6th Guru in the Tatkara,<br />
Samat 1701 being the year <strong>of</strong> the demise <strong>of</strong> the sixth Guru.<br />
Giani Mahan Singh has given many reasons for believing that<br />
the year <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> is Sam at 1699 and not<br />
1661. He finds that the <strong>Bir</strong> is not written in any hurry. His<br />
examination also shows that the various totals <strong>of</strong> Sabads which<br />
in the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> are either not given, or are many times<br />
given above or between the lines, are correctly given in the<br />
Banno <strong>Bir</strong> and stand recorded in the lines themselves. Besides,<br />
the story <strong>of</strong> many copyists having copied out the Granth is<br />
not correct, because the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> has been written by only 2/<br />
3 persons according to Giani Mahan Singh, 66 one person<br />
according to the University scholars and not more than 5<br />
persons according to Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pritam Singh. 67<br />
It is, thus, clear that the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> was written in Samat<br />
1699 and the story <strong>of</strong> many or twelve scribes having written it<br />
in Samat 1661 is incorrect and untenable. The theory <strong>of</strong> Banno<br />
<strong>Bir</strong> being original, or even the first copy <strong>of</strong> the