Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
37<br />
Singh writes that the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> is a copy <strong>of</strong> some copy <strong>of</strong><br />
the Banno <strong>Bir</strong>, that in the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> the entire Sabad <strong>of</strong><br />
Bhagat Surd as had been copied but later had been rubbed <strong>of</strong>f<br />
by Hartal, but by oversight one line <strong>of</strong> the Sabad which had<br />
been written in continuation <strong>of</strong> the Sabad <strong>of</strong> Bhagat Parma<br />
Nand Ji was left from being removed. This is entirely baseless<br />
since no Hartal has been used and only one line <strong>of</strong> Bhagat<br />
Surdas stands written, and this line is written quite separately.<br />
the same being not in continuation <strong>of</strong> any Sabad <strong>of</strong> Bhagat<br />
Parma Nand Ji. Since the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong>, as we know, has none<br />
<strong>of</strong> the additional compositions that are there in the Banno <strong>Bir</strong>,<br />
the question <strong>of</strong> its being a copy <strong>of</strong> the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> does not<br />
really arise. 45<br />
No one who reads the books <strong>of</strong> G.B. Singh and Jodh<br />
Singh can escape the conclusion that G. B. Singh has not written<br />
the book with any sense <strong>of</strong> integrity. and discrimination since<br />
he makes numerous baseless and senseless assertions without<br />
the least regard for truth. Jodh Singh, as mentioned above, has<br />
completely exploded the claim <strong>of</strong> research or scholarship made<br />
by G.B. Singh. Today, one can safely say that few persons with<br />
even nominal pretensions to scholarship are capable <strong>of</strong> making<br />
such wild and wrong statements as had been done by G.B.<br />
Singh.<br />
Since the criticism <strong>of</strong> G.B. Singh was too unfounded<br />
to need any notice now, and since the same had been replied<br />
to by Jodh Singh in 1946, ordinarily we need not have<br />
mentioned it. But, Dr. Mcleod in 1975 and 1980 and Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />
Pritam Singh in 1981 have tried to exume the burried ghost <strong>of</strong><br />
G.B. Singh. In a way they have kept him as a model in repeating<br />
some <strong>of</strong> his exploded theories and assertions which, on<br />
examination have been found to be baseless and untruthful.<br />
One thing both the scholars share in common with G.B. Singh<br />
is that none <strong>of</strong> them had examined the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> and<br />
Mcleod had not even a look at the Banno <strong>Bir</strong>.