13.11.2013 Views

Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies

Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies

Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

31<br />

contention was that the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> was not the original<br />

Granth compiled by the fifth Guru because it lacked a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> the features which the original Adi-Granth should have.<br />

Thirdly, he asserted that the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> was either a copy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> or a copy <strong>of</strong> its copy. Unfortunately, the<br />

contention <strong>of</strong> G. B. Singh, besides being entirely unfounded,<br />

were also couched in <strong>of</strong>fensive language. 32 The result was that<br />

in 1964, Dr. Jodh Singh, after a careful study <strong>of</strong> the Karlarpuri<br />

<strong>Bir</strong> published his book ,. Pracheen <strong>Bir</strong>an Bare”, which not only<br />

refuted completely the assertions <strong>of</strong> G. B. Singh but also<br />

thoroughly exposed the hollow, self- contradictory and false<br />

character <strong>of</strong> his statements and inferences.<br />

We have already indicated and discussed the various<br />

features <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> to show its authenticity; it would,<br />

therefore, be wasteful for us to repeat all the mis-statements<br />

<strong>of</strong> G. B. Singh and to detail the arguments and facts that show<br />

how baseless those are. However, we shall very broadly give<br />

the criticism <strong>of</strong> G. B. Singh and the reply <strong>of</strong> Jodh Singh on the<br />

three points mentioned above and consider some <strong>of</strong> the facts<br />

and views expressed by both <strong>of</strong> them in that regard. Dr. Jodh<br />

Singh brought out that while G. B. Singh had attacked the<br />

authenticity both <strong>of</strong> the Adi-Granth and the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong>, he<br />

had neither examined the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> nor seen the Mohan<br />

Pothies. 33 As to the Banno <strong>Bir</strong>, G. B. Singh conceded that he had<br />

very little time to have a close look at it. He had tried to build<br />

his arguments on the basis <strong>of</strong> the written replies <strong>of</strong> the<br />

custodian <strong>of</strong> the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> conveyed to him at Lahore. 34 One<br />

can well imagine how unsound a person’s arguments and<br />

inferences about the three Granths can be when regarding two<br />

<strong>of</strong> them, which he had never seen, much less examined, he<br />

depends purely on hearsay, and regarding the third Granth, the<br />

Banno <strong>Bir</strong>, he relies upon the obviously biased claims <strong>of</strong> the<br />

custodian <strong>of</strong> the Bano <strong>Bir</strong> concerning the very facts which an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!