Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
31<br />
contention was that the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> was not the original<br />
Granth compiled by the fifth Guru because it lacked a number<br />
<strong>of</strong> the features which the original Adi-Granth should have.<br />
Thirdly, he asserted that the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> was either a copy<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> or a copy <strong>of</strong> its copy. Unfortunately, the<br />
contention <strong>of</strong> G. B. Singh, besides being entirely unfounded,<br />
were also couched in <strong>of</strong>fensive language. 32 The result was that<br />
in 1964, Dr. Jodh Singh, after a careful study <strong>of</strong> the Karlarpuri<br />
<strong>Bir</strong> published his book ,. Pracheen <strong>Bir</strong>an Bare”, which not only<br />
refuted completely the assertions <strong>of</strong> G. B. Singh but also<br />
thoroughly exposed the hollow, self- contradictory and false<br />
character <strong>of</strong> his statements and inferences.<br />
We have already indicated and discussed the various<br />
features <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> to show its authenticity; it would,<br />
therefore, be wasteful for us to repeat all the mis-statements<br />
<strong>of</strong> G. B. Singh and to detail the arguments and facts that show<br />
how baseless those are. However, we shall very broadly give<br />
the criticism <strong>of</strong> G. B. Singh and the reply <strong>of</strong> Jodh Singh on the<br />
three points mentioned above and consider some <strong>of</strong> the facts<br />
and views expressed by both <strong>of</strong> them in that regard. Dr. Jodh<br />
Singh brought out that while G. B. Singh had attacked the<br />
authenticity both <strong>of</strong> the Adi-Granth and the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong>, he<br />
had neither examined the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> nor seen the Mohan<br />
Pothies. 33 As to the Banno <strong>Bir</strong>, G. B. Singh conceded that he had<br />
very little time to have a close look at it. He had tried to build<br />
his arguments on the basis <strong>of</strong> the written replies <strong>of</strong> the<br />
custodian <strong>of</strong> the Banno <strong>Bir</strong> conveyed to him at Lahore. 34 One<br />
can well imagine how unsound a person’s arguments and<br />
inferences about the three Granths can be when regarding two<br />
<strong>of</strong> them, which he had never seen, much less examined, he<br />
depends purely on hearsay, and regarding the third Granth, the<br />
Banno <strong>Bir</strong>, he relies upon the obviously biased claims <strong>of</strong> the<br />
custodian <strong>of</strong> the Bano <strong>Bir</strong> concerning the very facts which an