Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
24<br />
(h) A very significant point is that at page 963/1 <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> the words “Pran Sangli Maihla I” appear in<br />
Persian script. This Urdu writing has an important implication.<br />
In the original manuscript this Bani is supposed to be in the<br />
Persian script. But, it is a part <strong>of</strong> the traditional knowledge<br />
that the fifth Guru did not include (as is a fact) the “Pran Sangli”<br />
in the Adi-Granth because it was not considered by him to be<br />
the words <strong>of</strong> Guru Nanak, the connected story also being false.<br />
The writing <strong>of</strong> the heading <strong>of</strong> this Bani in Persian script would<br />
show only one thing, namely, that the scribe, Bhai Gurdas,<br />
wrote the heading <strong>of</strong> the Bani in Urdu, but before copying it<br />
out sought the approval <strong>of</strong> the Guru which was evidently not<br />
given and the matter rested at that. This is supported by the<br />
fact that in no copied Adi-Granth the words “Pran Sangli Maihla<br />
I” appear in the Persian script. This fact strongly supports the<br />
authenticity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong>. Since the writing being in<br />
Persian script, the scribe, unless asked otherwise, would<br />
naturally start copying it out in the same script. He did start<br />
with that assumption but as the composition was not approved,<br />
nothing was done further.<br />
5. Other conclusive factors.<br />
(a) We know that in the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> leaves, and not<br />
pages, are numbered and leaf number is given on the inside <strong>of</strong><br />
the leaf when it is facing one from the left. Thus, the page on<br />
the right side, as we open the <strong>Bir</strong>, has the same number as the<br />
page on the left. In order to identify a loose packet or cluster,<br />
on the first outer page <strong>of</strong> it, the leaf number inside <strong>of</strong> it was<br />
given. This expedient has led to a number <strong>of</strong> errors even in the<br />
Tatkara. Because the Bani which is on the outside page <strong>of</strong> a<br />
packet has been given the leaf number on its inside, though in<br />
actual numbering and counting, as explained already, this page<br />
is considered to be the right hand part <strong>of</strong> the page on the left<br />
<strong>of</strong> it. For example, in the Tatkara pages 332/2, 340/2, 348/2,<br />
420/2, 461/2, 810/2,937/2, have