13.11.2013 Views

Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies

Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies

Authenticity of Kartarpuri Bir - Global Sikh Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24<br />

(h) A very significant point is that at page 963/1 <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> the words “Pran Sangli Maihla I” appear in<br />

Persian script. This Urdu writing has an important implication.<br />

In the original manuscript this Bani is supposed to be in the<br />

Persian script. But, it is a part <strong>of</strong> the traditional knowledge<br />

that the fifth Guru did not include (as is a fact) the “Pran Sangli”<br />

in the Adi-Granth because it was not considered by him to be<br />

the words <strong>of</strong> Guru Nanak, the connected story also being false.<br />

The writing <strong>of</strong> the heading <strong>of</strong> this Bani in Persian script would<br />

show only one thing, namely, that the scribe, Bhai Gurdas,<br />

wrote the heading <strong>of</strong> the Bani in Urdu, but before copying it<br />

out sought the approval <strong>of</strong> the Guru which was evidently not<br />

given and the matter rested at that. This is supported by the<br />

fact that in no copied Adi-Granth the words “Pran Sangli Maihla<br />

I” appear in the Persian script. This fact strongly supports the<br />

authenticity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong>. Since the writing being in<br />

Persian script, the scribe, unless asked otherwise, would<br />

naturally start copying it out in the same script. He did start<br />

with that assumption but as the composition was not approved,<br />

nothing was done further.<br />

5. Other conclusive factors.<br />

(a) We know that in the <strong>Kartarpuri</strong> <strong>Bir</strong> leaves, and not<br />

pages, are numbered and leaf number is given on the inside <strong>of</strong><br />

the leaf when it is facing one from the left. Thus, the page on<br />

the right side, as we open the <strong>Bir</strong>, has the same number as the<br />

page on the left. In order to identify a loose packet or cluster,<br />

on the first outer page <strong>of</strong> it, the leaf number inside <strong>of</strong> it was<br />

given. This expedient has led to a number <strong>of</strong> errors even in the<br />

Tatkara. Because the Bani which is on the outside page <strong>of</strong> a<br />

packet has been given the leaf number on its inside, though in<br />

actual numbering and counting, as explained already, this page<br />

is considered to be the right hand part <strong>of</strong> the page on the left<br />

<strong>of</strong> it. For example, in the Tatkara pages 332/2, 340/2, 348/2,<br />

420/2, 461/2, 810/2,937/2, have

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!