13.11.2013 Views

Technical Paper by J.H. Greenwood - IGS - International ...

Technical Paper by J.H. Greenwood - IGS - International ...

Technical Paper by J.H. Greenwood - IGS - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Discussion and Closure<br />

DESIGNING TO RESIDUAL STRENGTH OF<br />

GEOSYNTHETICS INSTEAD OF STRESS-RUPTURE<br />

TECHNICAL NOTE UNDER DISCUSSION: <strong>Greenwood</strong>, J.H., 1997, “Designing<br />

to Residual Strength of Geosynthetics Instead of Stress-Rupture”, Geosynthetics<br />

<strong>International</strong>, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-10.<br />

DISCUSSER: S-C.R. Lo, Senior Lecturer, School of Civil Engineering, University<br />

College, University of New South Wales, Canberra, Australia, Telephone:<br />

1/61-6-2688349, Telefax: 1/61-6-2688337, E-mail: srl@octarine.cc.adfa.oz.au.<br />

PUBLICATION: Geosynthetics <strong>International</strong> is published <strong>by</strong> the Industrial Fabrics<br />

Association <strong>International</strong>, 1801 County Road B West, Roseville, Minnesota<br />

55113-4061, USA, Telephone: 1/612-222-2508, Telefax: 1/612-631-9334.<br />

Geosynthetics <strong>International</strong> is registered under ISSN 1072-6349.<br />

REFERENCES OF DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE: Lo, S-C.R., 1997,<br />

“Discussion of ‘Designing to Residual Strength of Geosynthetics Instead of<br />

Stress-Rupture’ <strong>by</strong> <strong>Greenwood</strong>, J.H.”, Geosynthetics <strong>International</strong>, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp.<br />

673-675.<br />

<strong>Greenwood</strong>, J.H., 1997, “Closure of Discussion of ‘Designing to Residual Strength of<br />

Geosynthetics Instead of Stress-Rupture’”, Geosynthetics <strong>International</strong>, Vol. 4, No. 6,<br />

pp. 675-677.<br />

Discussion <strong>by</strong> S-C.R. Lo<br />

The author of the paper has presented a more rational and less conservative method<br />

for assessing the load carrying capacity of geosynthetics under long term loading. However,<br />

clarifications are needed to ensure the proposed method is applied in a way compatible<br />

with the design conditions and philosophy of the design code used. The latter<br />

cannot be over-emphasised because of the introduction of limit state design codes that<br />

use a series of somewhat confusing partial factors.<br />

In a limit state design code, partial factors are used in lieu of a single factor of safety.<br />

The design strength, T D , is obtained <strong>by</strong> applying a partial factor f m to T CR , the rupture<br />

strength at the specified design life obtained <strong>by</strong> extrapolation of test data. In the context<br />

of limit state design, f m is used to cover uncertainties in the determination of T CR and the<br />

loss in effective load carrying area (say, due to construction damage). In BS 8006<br />

(1995), f m is considered as the product of a number of partial factors f m11 , f m12 ,etc.in<br />

GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL S 1997, VOL. 4, NO. 6<br />

673

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!