Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ...
Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ... Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ...
Table 4 Distillate Characteristics Severity Very low - Low Moderate Moderate-hiqh H2S FeSOg API H/C N,wt A S,wt A 0,wt A - fa Mn,g/mole no yes yes yes 15.2 13.3 1.59 1.53 0.26 0.37 3.15 3.11 0.89 1.30 26 - 31 - no Yes 17.0 1.56 0.39 2.98 1.28 29 107 yes yes no yes 15.9 15.8 1.57 1.54 0.41 0.41 2.A3 2.98 1.23 1.31 28 30 320 322 no yes 22.4 1.62 0.44 2.30 1.40 25 272 yes yes no yes 19.8 22.9 1.58 1.63 0.47 0.43 2.44 2.27 1.28 1.02 29 24 305 279 FIGURE 1 RESIDUE COMPOSITION no yes 25.4 1.58 0.50 1.64 1.46 30 293 - -very low low SEVERITY mderste mderatc-high 199 H2S H2S+FeS04 insoluble! FeS04 U 0 v) LL L Yes Yes 25.9 1.62 0.50 1.69 0.85 25 278
THO-STAGE COPROCESSING OF SUBBITUMINOUS COALS AND BITLMEN OR HEAVY OIL* ABSTRACT B. Ignasiak, T. Ohuchi, P. Clark, D. Aitchison and T. Lee Coal Research Department Alberta Research Council 1 O i l Patch Drive P.O. Bag #1310 Devon, A1 berta, Canada TOC 1EO Pretreatment of subbituminous coal with an appropriately formulated mix of carbon monoxide and water, in presence of bitumen or heavy oil, results in very fast reactions characterized by a high degree of coal solubilization and deoxy- genation. The reaction is catalysed by a mixture of alkali metal carbonates and proceeds readily at 380-400OC. The first-stage reaction product appears to be susceptible to further catalytic hydrogenation at 420-460T with gaseous hydrogen yielding 65-70% (on daf feed) of hydrogen-rich distillable oil, com- posed mainly of naphtha and middle oil. The process flowsheet is presented and the comparative economics of two-stage carbon nonoxide/steam-hydrogen and hydrogen-hydrogen coprocessing schemes are discussed. INTRODUCTION Alberta is endowed with immense reserves of subbituminous coals (11, bitumen and heavy oil (2). The concept of coprocessing coal and petroleum derived solvents is not a new one (3.4) and there is a consensus that this approach is more attractive economically than conventional coal 1 iquefaction (5). The most attractive feature of the coprocessing concept is its potential for elimination of oil recycle which may increase the output of the installation by up to three times. It has to be emphasized that under Alberta conditions the economics of a coprocessing plant have to be compared to a heavy oil and/or bitumen hydro- cracking plant. The major advantage of coprocessing as opposed to bitumen or heavy oil hydrocracking is the low cost of coal. This has to be weighed against the increased hydrogen consumption, increased plant complexity (conversion of coal to distillate oil requires more severe conditions compared to bitumen) and the element of risk associated with implementation of the new coprocessing technology. A factor which may have a substantial effect on the economics of coprocessing as compared to bitumen or heavy oil hydrocracking is that of purely chemical nature. It has not been firmly established whether the interaction among coal- and bitumen-derived radical intermediates leads to an increase or a reduction in oil yield or its quality. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that hydrocracking of bitumen in a one-stage process in the presence of small (1-3% by weight) quantities of sub- bituminous coal results in significant improvement in oil yield (6). Similar results can be obtained by employing chars generated from brown coals (4,7) and this furnishes a strong evidence that catalytic effects and not the chemistry of the components o f the substrate play a dominant role in a one-stage bituen * To be presented at the Fuel Division "Reactions of Coal in Novel Systems", Anaheim ACS Meeting, September 7-12. 1986 200
- Page 1 and 2: ABSTRACT LIQUEFACTION CO-PROCESSING
- Page 3 and 4: eaction temperature, 1000-1500 psig
- Page 5 and 6: 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15
- Page 7 and 8: I 0" 100- I I I WyO-3 P 3: 1500 psi
- Page 9 and 10: 11.3 A-6 yJ 600 OF, 1500 psig CO, 3
- Page 11 and 12: Experimental UDqradinq and Cooroces
- Page 13 and 14: catalytic to the thermal hydrogenat
- Page 15 and 16: the reaction with oil production re
- Page 17 and 18: TET did not promote the production
- Page 19 and 20: MICROAUTOCLAVE DESCRIPTION AND PROC
- Page 21 and 22: FEEDSTOCK PROPERTIES Some propertie
- Page 23 and 24: CONCLUSIONS HRI's microautoclave ha
- Page 25 and 26: 176
- Page 27 and 28: 100. 2 8%. M = ?8. 38. .... . . . .
- Page 29 and 30: CATALYTIC CO-PROCESSINS OF OHIO NO.
- Page 31 and 32: CATALYST COMPARISON STUDY The premi
- Page 33 and 34: fractions and a decrease of heavier
- Page 35 and 36: TABLE 2 Coal Analyses I1 1 i noi s
- Page 37 and 38: Temperature WHSV, G/hr/cc TABLE 6 C
- Page 39 and 40: z FIGURE 3 COAL REACTIVITY SCREENIN
- Page 41 and 42: COPROCESSING USING HzS AS A PROMOTE
- Page 43 and 44: - 3 - that product yields depend on
- Page 45 and 46: - 5 - occurs in the yields of aspha
- Page 47: Table 1 Analysis of Feedstocks Fore
- Page 51 and 52: esult in retrogressive reactions ta
- Page 53 and 54: 8. 6. Ignasiak, L. Lewkowicz, G. Ko
- Page 55 and 56: Table 4 OVERALL MASS BALANCE FOR TH
- Page 57 and 58: BACKGROUND COAL LIQUEFACTION/RESID
- Page 59 and 60: system, which could be operated wit
- Page 61 and 62: TABLE 1 EFFECT OF LC-FINING~"' TEMP
- Page 63 and 64: Figure 1. SCHEMATIC OF LCI CO-PROCE
- Page 65 and 66: SIMULATION OF A COAL/PETROLEuII RES
- Page 67 and 68: 20 pseudocomponents was developed t
- Page 69 and 70: ottoms is less sensitive to the num
- Page 71 and 72: Low Pressure Separator A temperatur
- Page 73 and 74: 7. Gallier, P.W., Boston, J.F., Wu,
- Page 75 and 76: I I I I I I I I I 100- --- Experime
- Page 77 and 78: Coprocessing Schemes The coprocessi
- Page 79 and 80: processing 25,000 and 150,000 bbl/d
- Page 81 and 82: FIGURE 1 I DISTRIBUTION OF REFINERI
- Page 83 and 84: Table 1. Samples Analyzed PNLNumber
- Page 85 and 86: the coal itself. The chemical compo
- Page 87 and 88: - - ITSL PAH Fraction PAH Fraction
- Page 89 and 90: PROCESS DEVELOPMENT STUDIES OF TWO-
- Page 91 and 92: SUMMARY e The major effect of close
- Page 93 and 94: omw '??h 4NO WNID ?N? 000 wmm c9'1'
- Page 95 and 96: tl f 246
- Page 97 and 98: 248
THO-STAGE COPROCESSING OF SUBBITUMINOUS COALS AND BITLMEN OR HEAVY OIL*<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
B. Ignasiak, T. Ohuchi, P. Clark, D. Aitchison and T. Lee<br />
Coal Research Department<br />
Alberta Research Council<br />
1 O i l P<strong>at</strong>ch Drive<br />
P.O. Bag #1310<br />
Devon, A1 berta, Canada<br />
TOC 1EO<br />
Pretre<strong>at</strong>ment <strong>of</strong> subbituminous <strong>co</strong>al with an appropri<strong>at</strong>ely formul<strong>at</strong>ed mix <strong>of</strong><br />
carbon monoxide and w<strong>at</strong>er, in presence <strong>of</strong> bitumen or heavy <strong>oil</strong>, results in very<br />
fast reactions characterized by a high degree <strong>of</strong> <strong>co</strong>al solubiliz<strong>at</strong>ion and deoxy-<br />
gen<strong>at</strong>ion. The reaction is c<strong>at</strong>alysed by a mixture <strong>of</strong> alkali metal carbon<strong>at</strong>es<br />
and proceeds readily <strong>at</strong> 380-400OC. The first-stage reaction product appears to<br />
be susceptible to further c<strong>at</strong>alytic hydrogen<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> 420-460T with gaseous<br />
hydrogen yielding 65-70% (on daf feed) <strong>of</strong> hydrogen-rich distillable <strong>oil</strong>, <strong>co</strong>m-<br />
posed mainly <strong>of</strong> naphtha and middle <strong>oil</strong>.<br />
The process flowsheet is presented and the <strong>co</strong>mpar<strong>at</strong>ive e<strong>co</strong>nomics <strong>of</strong> two-stage<br />
carbon nonoxide/steam-hydrogen and hydrogen-hydrogen <strong>co</strong><strong>processing</strong> schemes are<br />
discussed.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Alberta is endowed with immense reserves <strong>of</strong> subbituminous <strong>co</strong>als (11, bitumen<br />
and heavy <strong>oil</strong> (2). The <strong>co</strong>ncept <strong>of</strong> <strong>co</strong><strong>processing</strong> <strong>co</strong>al and petroleum derived<br />
solvents is not a new one (3.4) and there is a <strong>co</strong>nsensus th<strong>at</strong> this approach is<br />
more <strong>at</strong>tractive e<strong>co</strong>nomically than <strong>co</strong>nventional <strong>co</strong>al 1 iquefaction (5). The most<br />
<strong>at</strong>tractive fe<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> the <strong>co</strong><strong>processing</strong> <strong>co</strong>ncept is its potential for elimin<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>oil</strong> recycle which may increase the output <strong>of</strong> the install<strong>at</strong>ion by up to three<br />
times.<br />
It has to be emphasized th<strong>at</strong> under Alberta <strong>co</strong>nditions the e<strong>co</strong>nomics <strong>of</strong> a<br />
<strong>co</strong><strong>processing</strong> plant have to be <strong>co</strong>mpared to a heavy <strong>oil</strong> and/or bitumen hydro-<br />
cracking plant. The major advantage <strong>of</strong> <strong>co</strong><strong>processing</strong> as opposed to bitumen or<br />
heavy <strong>oil</strong> hydrocracking is the low <strong>co</strong>st <strong>of</strong> <strong>co</strong>al. This has to be weighed<br />
against the increased hydrogen <strong>co</strong>nsumption, increased plant <strong>co</strong>mplexity<br />
(<strong>co</strong>nversion <strong>of</strong> <strong>co</strong>al to distill<strong>at</strong>e <strong>oil</strong> requires more severe <strong>co</strong>nditions <strong>co</strong>mpared<br />
to bitumen) and the element <strong>of</strong> risk associ<strong>at</strong>ed with implement<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the new<br />
<strong>co</strong><strong>processing</strong> technology.<br />
A factor which may have a substantial effect on the e<strong>co</strong>nomics <strong>of</strong> <strong>co</strong><strong>processing</strong><br />
as <strong>co</strong>mpared to bitumen or heavy <strong>oil</strong> hydrocracking is th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> purely chemical<br />
n<strong>at</strong>ure. It has not been firmly established whether the interaction among <strong>co</strong>al-<br />
and bitumen-derived radical intermedi<strong>at</strong>es leads to an increase or a reduction<br />
in <strong>oil</strong> yield or its quality.<br />
On the other hand, it has been demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> hydrocracking <strong>of</strong> bitumen in a<br />
one-stage process in the presence <strong>of</strong> small (1-3% by weight) quantities <strong>of</strong> sub-<br />
bituminous <strong>co</strong>al results in significant improvement in <strong>oil</strong> yield (6). Similar<br />
results can be obtained by employing chars gener<strong>at</strong>ed from brown <strong>co</strong>als (4,7) and<br />
this furnishes a strong evidence th<strong>at</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alytic effects and not the chemistry<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>co</strong>mponents o f the substr<strong>at</strong>e play a dominant role in a one-stage bituen<br />
* To be presented <strong>at</strong> the Fuel Division "Reactions <strong>of</strong> Coal in Novel Systems",<br />
Anaheim ACS Meeting, September 7-12. 1986<br />
200