Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ...
Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ... Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ...
4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. -6- Lambert, J.M. Jr., Fuel 61,777 (1982) Stenberg, V.I., Baltisberger, R.J., Ogaura, T., Raman, K. and Woolsey, N.F., Am Chem Soc Div Fuel Chem Preprints 27,22 (1982) Stenberg, V.I., Tanabe, K. Ogaura, T., Sweeny, P. and Hei, R., Am Chem SOC Div Fuel Chem Preprints 28,183 (1983) Baldwin, R.M. and Vinciguerra, S., 62,498 (1983) Sondreal, E.A., Wilson, W.G., Stenberg, V.I., 61,925 (1982) Stenberg, V.I., Srinivas, V.R., Sweeny, P. Baltisberger, R.J. and Woolsey, N.F., 62,913 (1983) IO. Satterfield, C.N., Modell, M. and Mayer, J.F., AICHE J 21,1100 (1975) 11. Rollman, L.O.J., Catal 46,243 (1977) 12. Exxon Research and Engineering Company, U.S. Patent 4,149,959, April 17, 1979. 13. Gleim, W.K.T. U.S. Patent 3,303,126, June 17, 1964. 14. Rahimi, P.M. and Kelly, J.F. "Coprocessinq behaviour of Cold Lake vacuum bottoms and Forestburg subbituminous C coal using H2S as a catalyst"; Division Report ERP/ERL 84-21 (Confidential) CANMEI,Energy, Mines and Resources Canada, 1984. 15. Rahimi, P.M. and Kelly, J.F. " The use of H2S as a promoter in coprocessing low rank Canadian coals and hitumen"; proceedingsInternationa1 Conference on Coal Science, Sydney, Australia, October 1985, pp. 43-46. 16. Potter, J., Kybett, B.D., McDougall, W.M. Nambudiri, E.M.V. Rahimi, P.M. and Price, J.T. "Petrographic characterization of the solid products of coal-pitch coprocessing"; submitted for publication in Canadian Mineralogist. 197
Table 1 Analysis of Feedstocks Forestburg Coal Cold-Lake vacum bottolns Proximate analysis Specific gravity, 15/15'C 1.038 (wt %, as received) Pentane insolubles, wt % 23.8 Pitch content, wt % 83.2 Moisture 19.7 Conradson Carbon, wt I 17.1 Volatile 37.2 Elemental ccunposition,wt I Fixed carbon 36.1 C 83.34 Ash 7.0 H N 9.69 0.45 Ultimate analysis S 5.84 (wt I DAF) 0 0.68 C 74.34 Metals, ppm H N 4.81 1.78 V Ni 235 93 0 18.58 Fe 18 S 0.49 Table 2 Comparison of the Effects of H2S w ith FeSO(, Severity Low Moderate H2'5 (1) no yes FeSOq yes no Distillate yield (2) 22.9 27.3 Coal conversion (3) 53.7 67.9 Pitch conversion (4) 15.8 20.3 (1) (3) no Yes Yes no 36.3 43.2 70.4 80.4 34.1 42.5 8 wt I, based on maf slurry feed (2) w t I, based on maf slurry feed w t I, based on maf coal, (4) maf (+525 "C) in - maf (+525'C) out defined as THF solubility maf (+525"C) in Table 3 Comparison of The Effects of FeS04 and HpS + FeSO4 - Severity Very low Low Moderate Moderate-hiqh HgS (1) no yes no yes no yes no yes FeSO4 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes Distillate yield (2) 15.8 16.5 22.9 22.9 36.3 42.1 60.9 63.1 Coal conversion (3) 27.4 41.1 53.7 61.3 70.4 83.7 86.3 85.9 Pitch conversion (4) 8.1 7.5 15.8 18.6 34.1 42.4 64.8 69.7 (1) 8 wt %, based on maf slurry feed (2) wt I, based on maf slurry feed (3) wt %, based on maf coal, (4) maf (+525'C) in - maf (+525"C) out defined as THF solubility maf (+525"C) in 198
- Page 1 and 2: ABSTRACT LIQUEFACTION CO-PROCESSING
- Page 3 and 4: eaction temperature, 1000-1500 psig
- Page 5 and 6: 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15
- Page 7 and 8: I 0" 100- I I I WyO-3 P 3: 1500 psi
- Page 9 and 10: 11.3 A-6 yJ 600 OF, 1500 psig CO, 3
- Page 11 and 12: Experimental UDqradinq and Cooroces
- Page 13 and 14: catalytic to the thermal hydrogenat
- Page 15 and 16: the reaction with oil production re
- Page 17 and 18: TET did not promote the production
- Page 19 and 20: MICROAUTOCLAVE DESCRIPTION AND PROC
- Page 21 and 22: FEEDSTOCK PROPERTIES Some propertie
- Page 23 and 24: CONCLUSIONS HRI's microautoclave ha
- Page 25 and 26: 176
- Page 27 and 28: 100. 2 8%. M = ?8. 38. .... . . . .
- Page 29 and 30: CATALYTIC CO-PROCESSINS OF OHIO NO.
- Page 31 and 32: CATALYST COMPARISON STUDY The premi
- Page 33 and 34: fractions and a decrease of heavier
- Page 35 and 36: TABLE 2 Coal Analyses I1 1 i noi s
- Page 37 and 38: Temperature WHSV, G/hr/cc TABLE 6 C
- Page 39 and 40: z FIGURE 3 COAL REACTIVITY SCREENIN
- Page 41 and 42: COPROCESSING USING HzS AS A PROMOTE
- Page 43 and 44: - 3 - that product yields depend on
- Page 45: - 5 - occurs in the yields of aspha
- Page 49 and 50: THO-STAGE COPROCESSING OF SUBBITUMI
- Page 51 and 52: esult in retrogressive reactions ta
- Page 53 and 54: 8. 6. Ignasiak, L. Lewkowicz, G. Ko
- Page 55 and 56: Table 4 OVERALL MASS BALANCE FOR TH
- Page 57 and 58: BACKGROUND COAL LIQUEFACTION/RESID
- Page 59 and 60: system, which could be operated wit
- Page 61 and 62: TABLE 1 EFFECT OF LC-FINING~"' TEMP
- Page 63 and 64: Figure 1. SCHEMATIC OF LCI CO-PROCE
- Page 65 and 66: SIMULATION OF A COAL/PETROLEuII RES
- Page 67 and 68: 20 pseudocomponents was developed t
- Page 69 and 70: ottoms is less sensitive to the num
- Page 71 and 72: Low Pressure Separator A temperatur
- Page 73 and 74: 7. Gallier, P.W., Boston, J.F., Wu,
- Page 75 and 76: I I I I I I I I I 100- --- Experime
- Page 77 and 78: Coprocessing Schemes The coprocessi
- Page 79 and 80: processing 25,000 and 150,000 bbl/d
- Page 81 and 82: FIGURE 1 I DISTRIBUTION OF REFINERI
- Page 83 and 84: Table 1. Samples Analyzed PNLNumber
- Page 85 and 86: the coal itself. The chemical compo
- Page 87 and 88: - - ITSL PAH Fraction PAH Fraction
- Page 89 and 90: PROCESS DEVELOPMENT STUDIES OF TWO-
- Page 91 and 92: SUMMARY e The major effect of close
- Page 93 and 94: omw '??h 4NO WNID ?N? 000 wmm c9'1'
- Page 95 and 96: tl f 246
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
7.<br />
8.<br />
9.<br />
-6-<br />
Lambert, J.M. Jr., Fuel 61,777 (1982)<br />
Stenberg, V.I., Baltisberger, R.J., Ogaura, T., Raman, K. and<br />
Woolsey, N.F., Am Chem Soc Div Fuel Chem Preprints 27,22 (1982)<br />
Stenberg, V.I., Tanabe, K. Ogaura, T., Sweeny, P. and Hei, R.,<br />
Am Chem SOC Div Fuel Chem Preprints 28,183 (1983)<br />
Baldwin, R.M. and Vinciguerra, S., 62,498 (1983)<br />
Sondreal, E.A., Wilson, W.G., Stenberg, V.I., 61,925 (1982)<br />
Stenberg, V.I., Srinivas, V.R., Sweeny, P. Baltisberger, R.J. and<br />
Woolsey, N.F., 62,913 (1983)<br />
IO. S<strong>at</strong>terfield, C.N., Modell, M. and Mayer, J.F., AICHE J 21,1100<br />
(1975)<br />
11. Rollman, L.O.J., C<strong>at</strong>al 46,243 (1977)<br />
12. Exxon Research and Engineering Company, U.S. P<strong>at</strong>ent 4,149,959,<br />
April 17, 1979.<br />
13. Gleim, W.K.T. U.S. P<strong>at</strong>ent 3,303,126, June 17, 1964.<br />
14. Rahimi, P.M. and Kelly, J.F. "Coprocessinq behaviour <strong>of</strong> Cold Lake<br />
vacuum bottoms and Forestburg subbituminous C <strong>co</strong>al using H2S as a<br />
c<strong>at</strong>alyst"; Division Report ERP/ERL 84-21 (Confidential)<br />
CANMEI,Energy, Mines and Resources Canada, 1984.<br />
15. Rahimi, P.M. and Kelly, J.F. " The use <strong>of</strong> H2S as a promoter in<br />
<strong>co</strong><strong>processing</strong> low rank Canadian <strong>co</strong>als and hitumen";<br />
proceedingsIntern<strong>at</strong>iona1 Conference on Coal Science, Sydney,<br />
Australia, October 1985, pp. 43-46.<br />
16. Potter, J., Kybett, B.D., McDougall, W.M. Nambudiri, E.M.V.<br />
Rahimi, P.M. and Price, J.T. "Petrographic characteriz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
solid products <strong>of</strong> <strong>co</strong>al-pitch <strong>co</strong><strong>processing</strong>"; submitted for<br />
public<strong>at</strong>ion in Canadian Mineralogist.<br />
197
Change language