Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ...

Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ... Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ...

25.10.2012 Views

conditions generally employed. They cannot survive the severe processing conditions. Small amounts of dihydroxyl aromatics have been obtained in Bash or fsst pyrolysis conditions. The very rapid heating allows the dihydroxyl aromatics to escape the coal matrix before they can undergo retrogrrssive reac- tions. CONCLUSIONS The steam pretreatmentextraction process produces enhanced extractan yields. The extract has a high H/C ratio due to the presence of long chain polymethylene compounds which may or may not be attached to aromatic rins. The extract contains significant amounts of oxygenated compounds, some of which are present as dihydroxyl aromatics. A highly condensed residue (low H/C ratio) is obtained which can be attractive a8 a solid fuel lor combustion. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work has been supported by the Electric Power Research Institute through research project 2147-9. Shu-Yen Huang performed the IR and NMR analysis and prepared the FlMS samples. We thank Linda F. Atberton for helpful discussions. LITERATURE CITED 1. Atherton, L.F., Kulik, C.J. "Advanced Coal Liquefaction" paper presented at AIChE Annual Meet ing, Los Angeles, CA, November 1982. 2. Coal Technology Report Vol. 2, No. 11, p.1, May 28, 1984. 3. Kushaw, J.R.; Bagnell, L.J. ACS Div. Fuel Chem. 1985,30(3), 101. 4. Kenhaw, J.R.; Jezko, J.; Separation Science and Technolou 1982, 17(1), 151. 5. Kershaw J.R.; Fuel Processing Technology 1982, 5, 241. 6. Jezko, J.; Gray, D.; Kershaw, J.R.; Fuel Proces. Tech. 1982, 5, 229. 326 !

T,\llI.l< I ASAI,YSIS OP \\YOl)Al\: (;O.\l, s.wri.i; A 11 c \Vet Wct Vnruum Drird Carhn. 59.51 59.72 58.17 Ilydrqcn 4.70 4.13 4.35 OXYP 17.90 2?.44 18.9-1 Nitrryrn Chlorine 0.70 - 0.76 0.62 Sulfur 1.m 1.55 3.K Ash I3.W 13.47 16.48 TOTAL 90.55 103.07 101.02 BTU/lb 10,814 - 10.I41 An.- .I q L r mu pwfarnwd by I!uUmu Laboratory. Sham. pi. 750 38.5 1500 a0 ?GOO 36.0 32 7 TABLE 4 EIemeabl h dysh d ExCut, Raidn, A ~4 ~(RU n Wt% Extract R d u Fwd C n 51.21 6.77 u.n 60.71 3.69 4.!3 0 N 23.42 4.00 ILIO 1.01 22.44 0.70 S kh 4- 8.04 1.71 1T.U 2.s 13.47 Atomic Ralw II/C 1.28 0.08 0.05 O/C 0.32 0.13 0.28

<strong>co</strong>nditions generally employed. They cannot survive the severe <strong>processing</strong> <strong>co</strong>nditions. Small amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

dihydroxyl arom<strong>at</strong>ics have been obtained in Bash or fsst pyrolysis <strong>co</strong>nditions. The very rapid he<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

allows the dihydroxyl arom<strong>at</strong>ics to escape the <strong>co</strong>al m<strong>at</strong>rix before they can undergo retrogrrssive reac-<br />

tions.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The steam pretre<strong>at</strong>mentextraction process produces enhanced extractan yields. The extract has a<br />

high H/C r<strong>at</strong>io due to the presence <strong>of</strong> long chain polymethylene <strong>co</strong>mpounds which may or may not be<br />

<strong>at</strong>tached to arom<strong>at</strong>ic rins. The extract <strong>co</strong>ntains significant amounts <strong>of</strong> oxygen<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>co</strong>mpounds, some <strong>of</strong><br />

which are present as dihydroxyl arom<strong>at</strong>ics. A highly <strong>co</strong>ndensed residue (low H/C r<strong>at</strong>io) is obtained<br />

which can be <strong>at</strong>tractive a8 a solid fuel lor <strong>co</strong>mbustion.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This work has been supported by the Electric Power Research Institute through research project<br />

2147-9. Shu-Yen Huang performed the IR and NMR analysis and prepared the FlMS samples. We<br />

thank Linda F. Atberton for helpful discussions.<br />

LITERATURE CITED<br />

1. Atherton, L.F., Kulik, C.J. "Advanced Coal <strong>Liquefaction</strong>" paper presented <strong>at</strong> AIChE Annual Meet<br />

ing, Los Angeles, CA, November 1982.<br />

2. Coal Technology Report Vol. 2, No. 11, p.1, May 28, 1984.<br />

3. Kushaw, J.R.; Bagnell, L.J. ACS Div. Fuel Chem. 1985,30(3), 101.<br />

4. Kenhaw, J.R.; Jezko, J.; Separ<strong>at</strong>ion Science and Technolou 1982, 17(1), 151.<br />

5. Kershaw J.R.; Fuel Processing Technology 1982, 5, 241.<br />

6. Jezko, J.; Gray, D.; Kershaw, J.R.; Fuel Proces. Tech. 1982, 5, 229.<br />

326<br />

!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!