25.10.2012 Views

Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ...

Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ...

Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

M<strong>at</strong>erials<br />

Feeds to the WGS-solvent production reactor <strong>co</strong>nsisted <strong>of</strong> carbon<br />

monoxide, deionized w<strong>at</strong>er and a nearly s<strong>at</strong>ur<strong>at</strong>ed mesitylene solution<br />

<strong>of</strong> polynuclear arom<strong>at</strong>ic hydrocarbons (weight basis PAHIS: 11.6%<br />

phenanthrene, 12.0% pyrene and 16.7% fluoranthene). Mesitylene was<br />

chosen as the solvent for the gAH's because <strong>of</strong> its rel<strong>at</strong>ively low<br />

vapor pressure (75 psi <strong>at</strong> 240 C), its ability to dissolve large<br />

amounts <strong>of</strong> PAHIS <strong>at</strong> room temper<strong>at</strong>ure, and its stability under high<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>co</strong>al liquefaction <strong>co</strong>nditions. Extrud<strong>at</strong>es (0.8 mm<br />

diameter by 4 m length) <strong>of</strong> Shell 324M, a 2.8 wt. % Ni, 12.4 wt. %<br />

Mo on alumina c<strong>at</strong>alyst, were used in the WGS-solvent production<br />

reactor. Prior to use, the c<strong>at</strong>alyst was presukfided, in-situ for<br />

six hours, with 10 mole % H2S in H2 <strong>at</strong> 385 C and <strong>at</strong>mospheric<br />

pressure.<br />

<strong>Liquefaction</strong> reactions were performed with a bituminous <strong>co</strong>al,<br />

Illinois #6 (Burning Star Mine--proxim<strong>at</strong>e analysis: 3.78 moisture,<br />

9.4% ash, 34.5% vol<strong>at</strong>ile and 52.4% fixed carbon: dry basis ultim<strong>at</strong>e<br />

analysis: 72.5% C, 4.7% H, 1.0% N, 0.1% C1, 2.9% S, 9.8% ash, and<br />

9.0% 0 by difference; mineral m<strong>at</strong>ter <strong>co</strong>ntent: 13.7%).<br />

Appar<strong>at</strong>us and Procedure<br />

WGS-solvent production was performed in a <strong>co</strong>ncurrent flow trickle-<br />

bed reactor <strong>co</strong>nsisting <strong>of</strong> six 1.0 cm ID by 15 cm long c<strong>at</strong>alyst-<br />

filled stainless steel tubes <strong>co</strong>nnected in series. Each tube was<br />

filled with 10.5 g <strong>of</strong> c<strong>at</strong>alyst. The reactor was <strong>co</strong>ntained in a<br />

forced-air <strong>co</strong>nvection oven thermost<strong>at</strong>ted to 51. Oo C. Reactor<br />

pressure was <strong>co</strong>ntrolled with a precision back-pressure regul<strong>at</strong>or and<br />

gas and liquid products were sampled subsequent to pressure letdown.<br />

After pressuriging to 508 psig with CO, the reactor temper<strong>at</strong>ure was<br />

ramped to 240 C <strong>at</strong> 10 C/min and w<strong>at</strong>er flow was initi<strong>at</strong>ed. Upon<br />

detection <strong>of</strong> <strong>co</strong>nversion <strong>of</strong> CO/H 0 to CO /H , PAH solution flow was<br />

started. Carbon monoxide, w<strong>at</strong>er ind the hH2solution were delivered<br />

to the reactor <strong>at</strong> weight hourly space velocities <strong>of</strong> 0.124, 0.079,<br />

and 0.48 g-feed/hr/g-c<strong>at</strong>alyst, respectively. For the WGS reaction,<br />

the amount <strong>of</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er delivered was one percent in excess <strong>of</strong> th<strong>at</strong><br />

required by stoichiometry to ensure th<strong>at</strong> <strong>co</strong>nversion was limited only<br />

by thermodynamic equilibrium. It was estim<strong>at</strong>ed from the reactor<br />

void volume and fluid flow r<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the residence time <strong>of</strong> the gas<br />

was two minutes and th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> the liquid phase was approxim<strong>at</strong>ely sixty<br />

minutes.<br />

Prior to use for the liquefaction reactions, the solvent produced by<br />

the flow reactor was <strong>co</strong>ncentr<strong>at</strong>ed by nearly a factor <strong>of</strong> two by<br />

evapor<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> mesitylene under vacuum. This higher <strong>co</strong>ncentr<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

which allowed the use <strong>of</strong> lower solvent to <strong>co</strong>al r<strong>at</strong>ios for the<br />

liquefaction reactions, <strong>co</strong>uld be achieved because <strong>of</strong> the increased<br />

solubility <strong>of</strong> the hydroarom<strong>at</strong>ics formed in the flow reactor.<br />

<strong>co</strong>al liquefaction reactions were gerformed in b<strong>at</strong>ch micrqautoclaves<br />

with slurry capacities <strong>of</strong> 8 cm and gas volumes 35 cm (5). Four<br />

reactors <strong>co</strong>uld be oper<strong>at</strong>ed simultaneously. After the reactors were<br />

charged with <strong>co</strong>al and solvent, they were gressurized to 450 psig<br />

with nitrogen. They were then he<strong>at</strong>ed to 445 C for 36 min (time <strong>at</strong><br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure) in a fluidized sand b<strong>at</strong>h while being agit<strong>at</strong>ed with a<br />

wrist-action shaker <strong>at</strong> 200 cycles/min. Following the he<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

315

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!