Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ...
Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ...
Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
esults would be expected to be similar to those previously reported<br />
for naphthas from single stage processes (7).1<br />
Jet. To make jet fuel meeting the ASTM smoke point specific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
<strong>of</strong> 20mm.(minimum), most <strong>of</strong> the arom<strong>at</strong>ics in the <strong>co</strong>al liquids had to<br />
be hydrogen<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />
Figure 4 is a plot <strong>of</strong> smoke point versus arom<strong>at</strong>ic <strong>co</strong>ntent <strong>of</strong><br />
kerosene jet fuels from the various syncrudes. The results fall into<br />
two rough groups, those from Wyodak <strong>co</strong>al and those from Illinois <strong>co</strong>al.<br />
At a given arom<strong>at</strong>ics <strong>co</strong>ntent, those from Wyodak <strong>co</strong>al had smoke points<br />
2-3 mm higher than those from Illinois <strong>co</strong>al, a <strong>co</strong>nsequence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
higher Wyodak paraffin <strong>co</strong>ntent. [The Wyodak jet <strong>co</strong>ntained about 10<br />
LV% paraffins; the Illinois jet, 1-3 LV%.] The Illinois jet fuels met<br />
the jet smoke specific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> 20 mm <strong>at</strong> 10% arom<strong>at</strong>ics or lower; the<br />
Wyodak jet fuels met the specific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> about 16 LV% arom<strong>at</strong>ics.<br />
[Some <strong>of</strong> the sc<strong>at</strong>ter in results for products from a given <strong>co</strong>al was due<br />
to different b<strong>oil</strong>ing distributions. Those jet fuels <strong>co</strong>ntaining more<br />
low b<strong>oil</strong>ing m<strong>at</strong>erial had somewh<strong>at</strong> higher smoke points.]<br />
Jet fuels from <strong>co</strong>al <strong>of</strong>fer some unique advantages over those from<br />
petroleum. Because they <strong>co</strong>ntain high <strong>co</strong>ncentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> naphthenes,<br />
they are very dense and have high he<strong>at</strong>ing values by volume.<br />
Therefore, they <strong>co</strong>uld have specialized uses, such as for military<br />
fuels. FOK example, Figure 5 shows the densities <strong>of</strong> narrow b<strong>oil</strong>ing<br />
fractions <strong>of</strong> hydrotre<strong>at</strong>ed ITSL <strong>oil</strong>. Jet fuel <strong>of</strong> a desired density<br />
<strong>co</strong>uld be made by adjusting the b<strong>oil</strong>ing range. The ASTM specific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
for jet fuel gravity is 37OAPI (minimum). However, this specific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
is probably unnecessary for aircraft with modern flow <strong>co</strong>ntrollers, and<br />
lower gravity (higher density) fuels <strong>co</strong>uld be acceptable. Also, these<br />
jet fuels have unusually low freezing points, because <strong>of</strong> low normal<br />
paraffin <strong>co</strong>ntents.<br />
Diesel. Diesel products from both single-stage and two-stage<br />
procemet typical ASTM specific<strong>at</strong>ions. A rel<strong>at</strong>ively high degree<br />
<strong>of</strong> hydrogen<strong>at</strong>ion was needed to meet the cetane-number specific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />
40 (minimum).<br />
Figure 6 shows the rel<strong>at</strong>ionship for cetane number versus<br />
arom<strong>at</strong>ics <strong>co</strong>ntent for products from single-stage and two-stage<br />
processes. With the two-stage <strong>oil</strong>s, the specific<strong>at</strong>ion was met with an<br />
arom<strong>at</strong>ics <strong>co</strong>ntent <strong>of</strong> about 20 Lv%; with single-stage <strong>oil</strong>s, an arom<strong>at</strong>ic<br />
<strong>co</strong>ntent <strong>of</strong> less than 10 LV% was needed. These differences, however,<br />
were not necessarily the result <strong>of</strong> single-stage versus two-stage<br />
<strong>processing</strong>. R<strong>at</strong>her, they appear to be due to changes in b<strong>oil</strong>ing<br />
ranges <strong>of</strong> the diesels. For example, Table VI <strong>co</strong>mpares pairs <strong>of</strong><br />
samples <strong>of</strong> different b<strong>oil</strong>ing ranges. The arom<strong>at</strong>ics and paraffin<br />
<strong>co</strong>ntents within a given pair were about the same. Within each pair,<br />
the higher b<strong>oil</strong>ing sample had the higher cetane number. Also, in<br />
other <strong>co</strong>mparisons (1). the more paraffinic diesels had higher cetane<br />
numbers, when other properties were about equal.<br />
AS with the jet fuels described above, these <strong>co</strong>al-derived diesel<br />
fuels had excellent <strong>co</strong>ld we<strong>at</strong>her properties, and high volumetric<br />
energy <strong>co</strong>ntents.<br />
287