Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ...
Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ... Liquefaction co-processing of coal shale oil at - Argonne National ...
CATALYTIC TWO STAGE LIQUEFACTION PROCESS DEVELOPMENT History of Bench Unit Operations (through February 1986) Number of First Stage Runs Conditions Samples Illinois No. 6 Coal (1983-1984) - Process Variable Studies 8 149 38 First Stage Sampling 1 12 4 4 Process Demonstration -- 1 25 - 1 - Total Illinois No. 6 ( 1983- 1984 ) 10 186 43 4 Wyodak Sub-bi tuminous Coal (1983-1985) Process Variable Studies Process Demonstration Total Wyodak Coal 3 80 -- 2 44 5 124 25 - 3 28 18 8 26 - Illinois No. 6 Coal (1985-1986) Process Variable Studies 2 57 16 15 275 TABLE 2
FIRST-STAQ COAL CONVERSION (W I IIAF) VERSUS TEMPERATURE FIRST-STAGE TEMPERATURE, O F o Illinois No. 6 (Run 227-18) 0 Illinois No. 6 (Run, 227-32) + Wyodak, Run 227-22 (Conditions 4, 5 and 6) x Wyodak, Run 227-22 (Conditions 7 and 9) 276 FIGURE 2
- Page 73 and 74: 7. Gallier, P.W., Boston, J.F., Wu,
- Page 75 and 76: I I I I I I I I I 100- --- Experime
- Page 77 and 78: Coprocessing Schemes The coprocessi
- Page 79 and 80: processing 25,000 and 150,000 bbl/d
- Page 81 and 82: FIGURE 1 I DISTRIBUTION OF REFINERI
- Page 83 and 84: Table 1. Samples Analyzed PNLNumber
- Page 85 and 86: the coal itself. The chemical compo
- Page 87 and 88: - - ITSL PAH Fraction PAH Fraction
- Page 89 and 90: PROCESS DEVELOPMENT STUDIES OF TWO-
- Page 91 and 92: SUMMARY e The major effect of close
- Page 93 and 94: omw '??h 4NO WNID ?N? 000 wmm c9'1'
- Page 95 and 96: tl f 246
- Page 97 and 98: 248
- Page 99 and 100: qkCqQ r! o! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I-UH ')I
- Page 101 and 102: Materials The catalyst was shell 32
- Page 103 and 104: CONCLUSIONS Separation of a light h
- Page 105 and 106: Table 3. Results of activity testin
- Page 107 and 108: feed coal and plant configuration a
- Page 109 and 110: P1 #2 #3 114 115 #6 ITSL subbitumin
- Page 111 and 112: temperature, time and solvent power
- Page 113 and 114: TABLE 1 EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS AND
- Page 115 and 116: la Figure 1. lH-NMR spectra of samp
- Page 117 and 118: PERFORMANCE OF THE LOW TEMPERATURE
- Page 119 and 120: BENCH UNIT DESCRIPTION Process deve
- Page 121 and 122: Recycle Residuum Hydrogenati On Res
- Page 123: FIRST STAGE HRI'S CATALYTIC TWO STA
- Page 127 and 128: REACTOR SOLIOS HTOROGEN/CARBON ATOl
- Page 129 and 130: TRANSPORTATION FUELS FROM TWO-STAGE
- Page 131 and 132: Process Identification LV% Of AS- R
- Page 133 and 134: Table I11 HYDROTREATING TESTS WITH
- Page 135 and 136: Table IV HYDROTREATING TO 0.2 PPM N
- Page 137 and 138: Table VI EFFECT OF BOILING RANGE ON
- Page 139 and 140: (4) In all cases studied, the jet f
- Page 141 and 142: 292
- Page 143 and 144: INTEGRATED TWO-STAGE LIQUEFACTION:
- Page 145 and 146: are over-riding features in its fav
- Page 147 and 148: Complementary fundamental studies o
- Page 149 and 150: Comparative Economics of Two-Stage
- Page 151 and 152: The variation in hydrotreating cost
- Page 153 and 154: FIGURE 1: COMPARISONS OF ILLINOIS N
- Page 155 and 156: Process TABLE 1: TWO-STAGE PROCESSE
- Page 157 and 158: Abstract Temperature-Staged Catalyt
- Page 159 and 160: Results and Discussion Reactions in
- Page 161 and 162: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Derbyshire, F. J. an
- Page 163 and 164: I LL a rJJW ., .. ;> 0 i s W 8 a 31
- Page 165 and 166: Materials Feeds to the WGS-solvent
- Page 167 and 168: products. Thus, coupling the WGS an
- Page 169 and 170: 5. R. J. Xottenstette, Sandia Natio
- Page 171 and 172: ENHANCED COAL LIQUEFACTION WITH STE
- Page 173 and 174: change in weight being compared to
FIRST-STAQ COAL CONVERSION (W I IIAF)<br />
VERSUS TEMPERATURE<br />
FIRST-STAGE TEMPERATURE, O F<br />
o Illinois No. 6 (Run 227-18)<br />
0 Illinois No. 6 (Run, 227-32)<br />
+ Wyodak, Run 227-22 (Conditions 4, 5 and 6)<br />
x Wyodak, Run 227-22 (Conditions 7 and 9)<br />
276<br />
FIGURE 2
Change language