Chapters 44-95 - Germanic Mythology
Chapters 44-95 - Germanic Mythology
Chapters 44-95 - Germanic Mythology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
giants, Niflhel, Niflheim, extends over the whole lower world, the latter being regarded as<br />
identical with Niflheim and the places of punishment connected with it.<br />
This result carries with it another. The goddess of the lower world, and<br />
particularly of its domain of bliss, was in the mythology, as shall be shown below, the<br />
goddess of fate and death, Urd, also called Hel, when named after the country over which<br />
she ruled. In a local sense, the name Hel could be applied partly to the whole lower<br />
world, which rarely happened, partly to Urd's and Mimir's realms of bliss, which was<br />
more common. Hel was then the opposite of Niflhel, which was solely the home of<br />
misery and torture. Evidence of this shall be given below. But when the lower world had<br />
been changed to a sort of hell, the name Hel, both in its local and in its personal sense,<br />
must undergo a similar change, and since Urd (the real Hel) was transferred to the<br />
heavens, there was nothing to hinder Gylfaginning from substituting Loki's daughter, cast<br />
down into Niflhel, for the queen of the lower world and giving her the name Hel and the<br />
scepter over the whole lower world.<br />
This method is also pursued by Gylfaginning's author without hesitation, although<br />
he had the best of reasons for suspecting its correctness. A certain hesitancy might have<br />
been in order here. According to the mythology, the pure and pious Asa-god Baldur<br />
comes to Hel, that is to say, to the lower world, and to one of its realms of bliss. But after<br />
the transformation to which the lower world had been subjected in Gylfaginning's system,<br />
the descent of Baldur to Hel had to mean a descent to and a remaining in the world of<br />
misery and torture, and a relation of subject to the daughter of Loki. This should have<br />
awakened doubts in the mind of the author of Gylfaginning. But even here he had the<br />
courage to be true to his premises, and without even thinking of the absurdity in which he<br />
involves himself, he goes on and endows the sister of the Midgard-serpent and of the<br />
Fenris-wolf with that perfect power which before belonged to Destiny personified, so that<br />
the same gods who before had cast the horrible child of Loki down into the ninth region<br />
of Niflhel are now compelled to send a minister-plenipotentiary to her majesty to<br />
negotiate with her and pray for Baldur's liberation.<br />
But finally, there comes a point where the courage of consistency fails<br />
Gylfaginning. The manner in which it has placed the roots of the world-tree makes us<br />
first of all conceive Yggdrasil as lying horizontal in space. An attempt to make this<br />
matter intelligible can produce no other picture of Yggdrasil, in accord with the<br />
statements of Gylfaginning, than the following: