A Brief Review of Elasticity and Viscoelasticity for Solids 1 Introduction
A Brief Review of Elasticity and Viscoelasticity for Solids 1 Introduction
A Brief Review of Elasticity and Viscoelasticity for Solids 1 Introduction
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
H. T. Banks, S. H. Hu <strong>and</strong> Z. R. Kenz / Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 3 (2011), pp. 1-51 11<br />
Here<br />
T (n) = ( T (n)<br />
x<br />
, T (n)<br />
y<br />
Cauchy’s <strong>for</strong>mula (2.10) can be written concisely as<br />
, T (n) ) T,<br />
z <strong>and</strong> n = (nx , n y , n z ) T .<br />
T (n) = σn,<br />
where σ is the Cauchy stress tensor defined in (2.9).<br />
Remark 2.7. In addition to the Cauchy stress tensor, there are other stress tensors<br />
encountered in practice, such as the first Piola-Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor <strong>and</strong> second Piola-<br />
Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor. The differences between the Cauchy stress tensor <strong>and</strong> the Piola-<br />
Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensors as well as relationships between the tensors can be illustrated<br />
as follows:<br />
1. Cauchy stress tensor: relates <strong>for</strong>ces in the present (de<strong>for</strong>med/spatial) configuration<br />
to areas in the present configuration. Hence, sometimes the Cauchy stress is also called<br />
the true stress. In addition, the Cauchy stress tensor is symmetric, which is implied<br />
by the fact that the equilibrium <strong>of</strong> an element requires that the resultant moments<br />
vanish. We will see in Section 2.2.4 that the Cauchy stress tensor is used in the Eulerian<br />
equation <strong>of</strong> motion. Hence the Cauchy stress tensor is also referred to as the Eulerian<br />
stress tensor.<br />
2. First Piola-Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor (also called the Lagrangian stress tensor in [24,25]):<br />
relates <strong>for</strong>ces in the present configuration with areas in the initial configuration. The<br />
relationship between the first Piola-Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor P <strong>and</strong> the Cauchy stress<br />
tensor σ is given by<br />
P = |A|σ(A −1 ) T . (2.11)<br />
From the above equation, we see that in general the first Piola-Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor<br />
is not symmetric (its transpose is called the nominal stress tensor or engineering stress<br />
tensor). Hence, the first Piola-Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor will be inconvenient to use in a<br />
stress-strain law in which the strain tensor is always symmetric. In addition, we will<br />
see in Section 2.2.5 that the first Piola-Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor is used in the Lagrangian<br />
equation <strong>of</strong> motion. As pointed out in [25], the first Piola-Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor is the<br />
most convenient <strong>for</strong> the reduction <strong>of</strong> laboratory experimental data.<br />
3. Second Piola-Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor (referred to as Kirch<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor in [24, 25],<br />
though in some references such as [44] Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor refers to a weighted<br />
Cauchy stress tensor <strong>and</strong> is defined by |A|σ): relates <strong>for</strong>ces in the initial configuration<br />
to areas in the initial configuration. The relationship between the second Piola-<br />
Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor S <strong>and</strong> the Cauchy stress tensor σ is given by<br />
S = |A|A −1 σ(A −1 ) T . (2.12)<br />
From the above <strong>for</strong>mula we see that the second Piola-Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor is symmetric.<br />
Hence, the second Piola-Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor is more suitable than the first<br />
Piola-Kirchh<strong>of</strong>f stress tensor to use in a stress-strain law. In addition, by (2.11) <strong>and</strong><br />
(2.12) we find that<br />
S = A −1 P. (2.13)