09.11.2013 Views

Holocene vegetational history of the Apuseni ... - geo.edu.ro

Holocene vegetational history of the Apuseni ... - geo.edu.ro

Holocene vegetational history of the Apuseni ... - geo.edu.ro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1478<br />

A. Bodnariuc et al. / Quaternary Science Reviews 21 (2002) 1465–1488<br />

Table 4<br />

Description <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> local pollen assemblage zones in <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Padis pr<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>ile<br />

LPAZ/Depth (cm) LPAZ name Main features <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> LPAZ<br />

Pad. 12 5–11<br />

Poaceae–Fagus–Picea–Carpinus–Corylus–Quercus<br />

Small decrease in Poaceae, Picea and Carpinus, slight increase<br />

in Fagus, Quercus, Corylus and Pinus<br />

Pad. 11 11–15 Poaceae–Fagus–Picea–Carpinus–Cerealia Decrease in Poaceae and synch<strong>ro</strong>nous increase in Fagus, Picea,<br />

Carpinus, Quercus and Pinus<br />

Upper limit: decrease in Poaceae, increase in Fagus<br />

Pad. 10 15–20 Poaceae–Fagus–Picea–Cerealia Abrupt increase in Poaceae and synch<strong>ro</strong>nous decrease in Fagus<br />

and Picea. Cerealia, Plantago, Rumex and Chenopodiaceae well<br />

represented,<br />

Upper limit: decrease in Poaceae, increase in Fagus and Picea<br />

Pad. 9 20–25 Fagus–Poaceae–Picea–Corylus–Quercus Increase in Picea, decrease in Quercus, slight increase in Fagus,<br />

decrease in Chenopodiaceae<br />

Upper limit: increase in Poaceae, decrease in Fagus and Picea<br />

Pad. 8 25–30 Fagus–Poaceae–Picea Decrease in Picea and Abies, increase in Quercus and Betula,<br />

Poaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Rumex, Plantago and Cerealia<br />

Upper limit: slight increase in Fagus and Picea, decrease in<br />

Chenopodiaceae<br />

Pad. 7 30–40 Fagus–Picea–Abies Fall in Carpinus, decline in Fagus, increase <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>n decline in Picea<br />

and Abies. Increase in Chenopodiaceae at <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> end <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> phase<br />

Upper limit: decline in Picea and Abies, increase in Poaceae and<br />

Chenopodiaceae<br />

Pad. 6 40–50 Fagus–Picea–Carpinus–Poaceae–Abies Optimum <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Fagus, small variations in Picea and Carpinus and<br />

increase in Poaceae and Corylus. Small increase in Artemisia<br />

Upper limit: decrease in Fagus and Carpinus, increase in Picea<br />

and Abies<br />

Pad. 5 50–55 Fagus–Picea–Carpinus–Abies Increase in Picea, Carpinus and Chenopodiaceae. Small<br />

decrease in Abies and small increase in Fagus<br />

Upper limit: decrease in Carpinus and Picea, increase in<br />

Poaceae<br />

Pad. 4 55–70 Fagus–Picea–Abies–Carpinus Small increase in Abies and Fagus, fluctuations <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Carpinus and<br />

Corylus, small increase in Chenopodiaceae. Beginning <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

AP/T decline at <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> end <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> phase<br />

Upper limit: Increase in Picea, Carpinus and Chenopodiaceae<br />

Pad. 3 70–80 Corylus–Carpinus–Fagus–Picea–Abies Decrease in Corylus, Carpinus Ulmus. Increase in Abies, Fagus<br />

and Picea. Small increase in Juglans<br />

Upper limit: decrease in Carpinus, small increase in Corylus<br />

Pad. 2 80–85 Corylus–Carpinus–Picea–Fagus Decrease in Corylus and increase in Carpinus and Fagus. Small<br />

increase in Quercus and Abies. Presence <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Juglans<br />

Upper limit: increase in Abies and Fagus, decrease in Corylus<br />

and Carpinus<br />

Pad. 1 85–90 Corylus–Picea–Poaceae Increase in Corylus,decrease in Poaceae. Carpinus, Fagus and<br />

Abies present but rare<br />

Upper limit: decrease in Corylus, increase in Carpinus and<br />

Fagus<br />

F<strong>ro</strong>m RPAZ 5–9 (ca 6450 cal BP–Present), <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> pollen<br />

diagrams <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Bergerie, Padis and Cimeti"ere can be<br />

compared.<br />

At Padis, between 4650 and 4100 cal BP, in <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> upper<br />

part <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> RPAZ 5, <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> percentages <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Carpinus are low<br />

(2%) when comparing with Bergerie (near 5%) and<br />

Cimeti"ere (near 10%). At Padis, Cimeti"ere and Bergerie,<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> increase in Fagus and Carpinus and <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> synch<strong>ro</strong>nous<br />

decrease in Corylus characterise <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> beginning <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

RPAZ 6 dated ca 4500 cal BP (4050780 BP) at Bergerie.<br />

This age, d<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>edu</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>ced f<strong>ro</strong>m that <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> levels 160–155 f<strong>ro</strong>m<br />

Bergerie (4050780 BP), was preferred to that <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

bottom <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Padis (4595765 BP, 5300 cal BP) for three<br />

reasons: at Padis <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> thickness <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> sample is 15 cm<br />

and at Bergerie only 5 cm; at Padis <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> dated sediment<br />

concerns material situated below <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> beginning <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Fagus curve; comparison between <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> dates obtained for<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Fagus expansion at Bergerie (4050780 BP) and in<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> southwestern Carpathians, in Banat mountains<br />

(3880760 BP; R.osch and Fischer, 2000), are close to<br />

4500 cal BP.<br />

The beginning <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> RPAZ 7 corresponds to <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Abies<br />

development dated ca 4200 cal BP (3720760 BP) at<br />

Bergerie. The end <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> RPAZ 7 is not dated. The p<strong>ro</strong>posed<br />

limit at 1940 cal BP is based on an interpolation between<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> radiocarbon dating <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Bergerie (3720760 and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!