09.11.2013 Views

Improving Global Quality of Life

Improving Global Quality of Life

Improving Global Quality of Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

technology based on the existing pipeline materials, welding technology and standards on transmission <strong>of</strong><br />

hydrocarbons.<br />

9.4.4 Testing <strong>of</strong> pipes<br />

Although a very small number <strong>of</strong> pipeline failures is caused each year by stress-corrosion cracking (SCC), it<br />

remains a concern to pipeline operators and regulators. The primary methods for managing the problem<br />

include periodic hydrostatic testing, in-line inspection (ILI), or SCC direct assessment (DA). The choice <strong>of</strong><br />

methods depends on many factors unique to each pipeline. No single method is appropriate for every case.<br />

Since all three methods are very costly, especially compared to the relatively low risk <strong>of</strong> failures, it would be<br />

<strong>of</strong> considerable benefit to the industry if more-cost-effective ways to manage SCC were available.<br />

Hydrostatic Testing: Hydrostatic testing is the most common method for locating SCC. It is well accepted by<br />

the industry and by regulatory agencies, and it is certain to find every crack that is larger than a critical size,<br />

which depends upon the test pressure. There are a number <strong>of</strong> limitations to hydrostatic testing, however. It<br />

requires that flow <strong>of</strong> the product through the pipeline be interrupted, which may not be practical if the line<br />

is not looped. In areas with large elevation differences, it might not be possible to achieve sufficient pressure<br />

at the high points without excessive segmentation <strong>of</strong> the line. Furthermore, water might not be available,<br />

or, if it is, the cost <strong>of</strong> disposing <strong>of</strong> it, due to environmental concerns, might be prohibitive. In situations such<br />

as those, ILI or SCC DA may be preferable.<br />

In-Line Inspection: ILI has certain advantages over hydrostatic testing in that it can find cracks that are<br />

smaller than those that would fail at the hydrostatic-test pressure, thus potentially providing greater margins<br />

<strong>of</strong> safety, and, in many cases, it can be conducted in the fluid that the pipeline is meant to carry, thus not<br />

requiring interruption <strong>of</strong> service. Ultrasonic techniques have been most successful at locating and sizing<br />

stress-corrosion cracks in liquid pipelines where the liquid petroleum product serves as the couplant for<br />

energy flow between the transducers and the pipe. Achieving satisfactory coupling in gas pipelines has been<br />

a serious problem. A recently developed technology involving electromagnetic acoustic transducers shows<br />

promise for overcoming this problem, but it has not yet been validated through field trials. Another serious<br />

limitation <strong>of</strong> current ultrasonic ILI tools is their inability to find cracks in dents. This is because the geometry<br />

<strong>of</strong> the dent throws <strong>of</strong>f the angles <strong>of</strong> transmitted and reflected waves.<br />

SCC Direct Assessment: SCC DA is an important method <strong>of</strong> integrity assurance, especially for portions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pipeline where it is impractical or even impossible to do ILI or hydrostatic testing. The SCC DA process was<br />

formalised with the publication <strong>of</strong> an NACE Recommended Practice. Essentially, SCC DA involves making<br />

intelligent choices about where to excavate the pipeline and then directly examining the pipe to determine<br />

the severity <strong>of</strong> cracking as a basis for deciding what actions should be taken and how soon. The foundation<br />

to SCC DA is proper site selection, which remains a major challenge.<br />

Internal SCC in Ethanol Pipelines: With the increasing use <strong>of</strong> ethanol as an additive to gasoline, consideration<br />

is being given to transport <strong>of</strong> denatured ethanol by pipeline. Currently, denatured fuel grade ethanol is<br />

transported primarily by railroad tanker cars and tanker trucks. The discovery <strong>of</strong> SCC in user terminals,<br />

storage tanks, and loading/unloading racks in contact with denatured fuel-grade ethanol has raised concern<br />

about potential effects in pipelines. Research is needed to develop a better understanding <strong>of</strong> the causes <strong>of</strong><br />

SCC in ethanol and, based upon that understanding, to suggest and evaluate possible ways to prevent it.<br />

Crack Arrest: When a crack in a welded structure propagates under the action <strong>of</strong> a load, it can extend in<br />

principally two different manners, stably by ductile tearing, or unstably by either brittle fracture or disruptive<br />

ductile fracture. Crack growing stably will arrest unless the stress intensity applied to the crack tip continues<br />

to increase at a greater rate than the crack resistance curve. Analysis and prediction <strong>of</strong> an arrest event <strong>of</strong> a<br />

dynamically running unstable crack, however, is a major challenge for higher grade pipeline steels (X 80 and<br />

beyond) and welds.<br />

110 <strong>Improving</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Through Optimum Use and Innovation <strong>of</strong> Welding and Joining Technologies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!