04.11.2013 Views

IEA Solar Heating and Cooling Programm - NachhaltigWirtschaften.at

IEA Solar Heating and Cooling Programm - NachhaltigWirtschaften.at

IEA Solar Heating and Cooling Programm - NachhaltigWirtschaften.at

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>IEA</strong> SHC Task 38 <strong>Solar</strong> Air Conditioning <strong>and</strong> Refriger<strong>at</strong>ion Subtask C2-A, November 9, 2009<br />

[1]. Thus the he<strong>at</strong> flow transient is less steep than in Figure 5 <strong>and</strong> the pl<strong>at</strong>eaus are less<br />

distinct.<br />

Comparing Figures 5 <strong>and</strong> 6 it can be observed th<strong>at</strong> alloc<strong>at</strong>ing the thermal mass to the<br />

external parts as in Figure 5 yields a faster response with regard to achieving a new steadyst<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

The dynamic course of Figure 5 clearly shows obvious pl<strong>at</strong>eaus cre<strong>at</strong>ed by the<br />

transport delay in the solution circuit. As no internal thermal mass has been alloc<strong>at</strong>ed, the<br />

solution changes occur quite rapidly after the step <strong>and</strong> then become weaker <strong>and</strong> are<br />

dampened with time. The course in Figure 6 is much less pronounced <strong>and</strong> the gradients of<br />

he<strong>at</strong> flows are less steep. The model behaviour shown in Figures 5 <strong>and</strong> 6 demonstr<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong><br />

in order to <strong>at</strong>tain a short response time the absorption chiller should be designed with<br />

possibly small internal thermal mass, however this will result in stronger vari<strong>at</strong>ions during the<br />

transient period. Internally coupled thermal mass is more important than externally coupled<br />

thermal mass.<br />

Transport delay vari<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

A second analysis has been performed to determine the sensitivity of the model results on<br />

time constants c 1 <strong>and</strong> c 2 which represent the transport time of the solution from gener<strong>at</strong>or to<br />

absorber <strong>and</strong> vice versa. The time constants have been set to 0, 50 <strong>and</strong> 100% of their<br />

original values which have been estim<strong>at</strong>ed from the design of the experimental plant. Table 2<br />

shows the time constants used. For these simul<strong>at</strong>ions, the same hot w<strong>at</strong>er inlet step from<br />

75°C to 85°C as before has been applied. Also, no t hermal mass has been assumed. Figure<br />

7 shows the results, again expressed using the external he<strong>at</strong> flow to the evapor<strong>at</strong>or.<br />

Table 2. Assumed transport delays for the model.<br />

Transport delay<br />

c 1 c 2<br />

100% 67 61<br />

50% 33 30<br />

0% 2 1<br />

page 88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!