03.11.2013 Views

Healthy Money Healthy Planet - library.uniteddiversity.coop

Healthy Money Healthy Planet - library.uniteddiversity.coop

Healthy Money Healthy Planet - library.uniteddiversity.coop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

25<br />

was awaiting a private ruling on whether it had avoided paying goods and<br />

service tax. For all the shortcomings of this voucher scheme, it is an example of<br />

how to build in incentives for each of the stakeholders. It was owned and run<br />

by Robert Walsh and Peter McNally, whose company McNally Australia Pty Ltd<br />

was based in Gympie, Queensland. There were 900 members at the time of<br />

suspension, down from a peak of 14,000, and regular meetings of participants<br />

were held in each town and suburb.<br />

Essentially, SABC was a voucher system in which members accepted each<br />

others’ vouchers. A development fund was kept separate for investing in<br />

Australian­owned business. The scheme’s ‘loyalty reward shopping vouchers’<br />

were sold in four denominations: V5, V10, V20 and V50. The front of the<br />

vouchers looked almost like Australian money, because they used the same<br />

colours as the A$5, A$10, A$20 and A$50 notes.<br />

The loyalty vouchers, or pre­paid gift certificates, could be used and<br />

traded amongst business members, with no transaction fees applicable. By<br />

accepting loyalty vouchers, some businesses increased their ability to attract<br />

new customers with no risk involved, as the vouchers were 90 per cent<br />

redeemable for Australian dollars from McNally Australia Pty Ltd. Consumers<br />

bought V55 for A$50, thereby gaining 10 per cent purchasing power, and<br />

further incentives were built in.<br />

In contrast with other publicly created currencies, members of the SABC<br />

had no right to essential business information as McNally Australia Pty Ltd<br />

was a private company. Therefore, members never knew how many vouchers<br />

had been sold, how many vouchers had been redeemed or the state of the<br />

business situation of the system.<br />

One of the major issues that confronts businesses when dealing in<br />

alternative trading systems is that of being stuck with complementary currency<br />

they can’t spend. In contrast to the Salt Spring Island Gift Certificates scheme<br />

(see page 000), which redeems merchants’ vouchers at par, the SABC scheme<br />

was set up to stimulate merchants to encourage their suppliers to accept<br />

vouchers too. The scheme did this through built­in incentives, which meant<br />

that merchants didn’t lose out if they could persuade their suppliers to accept<br />

the vouchers.<br />

While at the start of the scheme the option to redeem the currency for<br />

Australian dollars had been taken up for 70 per cent of the vouchers issued in<br />

the first and second years, this figure had dropped to 7.5 per cent by 2002. The<br />

more the businesses used the vouchers among themselves, the less the<br />

vouchers were redeemed, and as a result the issuing company accumulated a<br />

growing amount of Australian dollars. The SABC used these dollars to buy<br />

back foreign­owned businesses and support Australian inventions. In three­

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!