03.11.2013 Views

the problematics of motherhood in twentieth century women's fiction

the problematics of motherhood in twentieth century women's fiction

the problematics of motherhood in twentieth century women's fiction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

241<br />

6.2.0. A quick recapitulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous chapters<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts towards differ<strong>in</strong>g attitudes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> women characters<br />

towards mo<strong>the</strong>rhood - some accept it meekly and<br />

unquestion<strong>in</strong>gly, o<strong>the</strong>rs accept lt wlth an iota <strong>of</strong><br />

scepticism, yet o<strong>the</strong>rs accept ~t though <strong>the</strong>y consider it a<br />

burden, some o<strong>the</strong>rs accept it on <strong>the</strong>lr own terms, ignor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

or question<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> norms, some women totally rebel<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st foisted roles while o<strong>the</strong>rs relect lt outright.<br />

Between acceptance, question<strong>in</strong>g and relectlon lie a range <strong>of</strong><br />

attitudes whlch may be conservative, revolutionary.<br />

reactionary or radical. It hence becomes <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

d~fficult to taper down <strong>the</strong>se wlde-rang<strong>in</strong>g claims to one<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle deflnltion <strong>of</strong> femlnist mo<strong>the</strong>rhood Tak<strong>in</strong>g Into<br />

account <strong>the</strong> differences <strong>in</strong> cultural background <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

femlnlst authors studled here, lt would be best to conslder<br />

<strong>the</strong> pluralistic attitudes towards mo<strong>the</strong>rhood, ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

tylng oneself to a s<strong>in</strong>gle def<strong>in</strong>ition.<br />

6.2.1. What, <strong>the</strong>n, 1s fem1n:st mo<strong>the</strong>rhood? If lt 1s not<br />

a bl<strong>in</strong>d acceptance <strong>of</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>rhood, does it necessarily mean<br />

that 1t 1s a rejection <strong>of</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>rhood? The emerglng femlnist<br />

mo<strong>the</strong>rs del~neated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> prevlous chapters at some po<strong>in</strong>t or<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>lr lives questlon or rebel agalnst <strong>the</strong><br />

normally accepted Ideals <strong>of</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>rhood. But although Saru,<br />

Kate, Meridlan and Morag, at some stage, rel<strong>in</strong>quish <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

mo<strong>the</strong>r-role, <strong>the</strong>y later try to redef<strong>in</strong>e it. The end<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!