25.10.2012 Views

City of Light: The Story of Fiber Optics

City of Light: The Story of Fiber Optics

City of Light: The Story of Fiber Optics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A DEMONSTRATION FOR THE QUEEN 173<br />

digital fiber links carrying 24 telephone conversations in Scientific American. 87<br />

Developers demonstrated digital repeaters operating at 6.3, 45, and 274 million<br />

bits per second. <strong>The</strong> two slower ones used LEDs; the fastest one a roomtemperature<br />

diode laser. 88 <strong>The</strong> next step was to take the technology out <strong>of</strong><br />

the lab for a field trial like the one <strong>of</strong> the millimeter waveguide nearing its<br />

start in New Jersey.<br />

AT&T, being a giant corporation, had a committee set the parameters.<br />

Some choices were easy. <strong>The</strong> main goal was to test digital transmission in an<br />

urban environment. <strong>Fiber</strong>-optic cables packed a lot <strong>of</strong> capacity in a small<br />

diameter, so they could alleviate crowding in underground ducts—saving the<br />

phone company the untold millions needed to dig up the streets and lay new<br />

ducts. <strong>Fiber</strong>s also could stretch much farther between repeaters than the 6000<br />

feet (1.8 kilometers) possible with wires.<br />

Committees need something to debate, and this one concentrated on transmission<br />

speed. Some people wanted fibers to replace the 1.5 million bit per<br />

second T1 lines that AT&T had been installing since 1962; that way they<br />

could interface directly with existing systems. Another suggestion was to operate<br />

at the 6 million bit per second T2 speed, where electronics were readily<br />

available. However, executive director Warren Danielson pushed for the 45<br />

million bit per second T3 rate, which had never been used for lack <strong>of</strong> a cable<br />

to carry it. He argued the slower speeds didn’t improve on wires and that the<br />

higher speed would share the high cost <strong>of</strong> the laser and fiber over more<br />

channels. <strong>The</strong> others agreed. 89<br />

Ira Jacobs’s group at Holmdel spent 1975 assembling equipment for tests<br />

at a suburban Atlanta AT&T plant. <strong>The</strong>y packed Corning and AT&T fibers<br />

into plastic-coated ribbons <strong>of</strong> 12 fibers, and stacked a dozen ribbons together<br />

to make a pencil-thin 144-fiber core for the cable. 90 <strong>The</strong>y threaded 650 meters<br />

(2100 feet) <strong>of</strong> that cable through ducts buried under a parking lot, then<br />

spliced fiber ends together to test transmission over distances up to 10.9 kilometers<br />

(6.8 miles). 91 <strong>The</strong>y put a separate fiber cable through environmental<br />

torture tests in a duct where they could adjust the temperature and humidity.<br />

On January 13, 1976, they turned on the Atlanta fiber system and spent the<br />

next several months waiting for something bad to happen.<br />

<strong>The</strong> communications world watched. <strong>The</strong> British Post Office and others<br />

had their own tests in the works, but no one had the resources to match Bell<br />

Labs. Bell might not lead in inspiration, but it excelled in perspiration. Its<br />

careful and cautious engineers would poke and probe the new technology<br />

and spot any problems.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y did find one problem. A distressingly large fraction <strong>of</strong> the lasers died<br />

during the test. That was not unexpected, nor was it fatal. Laser lifetimes<br />

were improving steadily, and Bell was hedging its bets by developing LEDbased<br />

transmitters. Otherwise, ‘‘things went quite smoothly,’’ Jacobs recalls.<br />

<strong>Fiber</strong> loss was smaller than expected, as was the variability among components.<br />

92 Bell had hoped to get 100 good fibers, but 138 <strong>of</strong> the 144 were good.<br />

Average loss was six decibels per kilometer, below the planned eight deci-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!