25.10.2012 Views

City of Light: The Story of Fiber Optics

City of Light: The Story of Fiber Optics

City of Light: The Story of Fiber Optics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

124 CITY OF LIGHT<br />

It’s a big challenge to measure a little attenuation because it’s a small<br />

difference between two large numbers. One percent accuracy may sound fine,<br />

but it’s useless if you want to measure the difference between 99 and 99.5<br />

microwatts. Doing better is a challenge for the best <strong>of</strong> laboratory wizards, and<br />

that was not Charles Kao’s specialty.<br />

Today, engineers measure attenuation in the clearest fibers by passing light<br />

through one kilometer, or ten, or a hundred. That builds up loss until it’s<br />

high enough to measure easily. Kao didn’t have that luxury; no one knew<br />

how to draw good fibers from the clearest glasses. <strong>The</strong> best he could do was<br />

work with samples <strong>of</strong> bulk glass about 30 centimeters (a foot) long.<br />

Nobody had ever tried to measure such low losses before, so he had to<br />

develop a new technique. His first study showed glass could be made clearer<br />

than standard imaging fibers, but could not measure loss as low as 20 decibels<br />

per kilometer. 36 That required him and Mervin W. Jones to devise an even<br />

more sensitive instrument, which compared light passing through two glass<br />

rods, one 20 centimeters (8 inches) longer than the other. Accurate comparison<br />

is a demanding task, but it let them cancel the effects <strong>of</strong> surface reflection<br />

and concentrate on loss in the bulk glass.<br />

Kao sought the purest glass available for his measurements. Ordinary optical<br />

glass would not do because the raw materials that go into it are riddled<br />

with impurities. Instead, he studied fused silica, a synthetic glass that is essentially<br />

pure silicon dioxide (SiO 2), with less than one part per million <strong>of</strong> the<br />

troublesome iron impurities. 37 At first their results looked too good to be true.<br />

<strong>The</strong> samples seemed to be perfectly clear, with no attenuation at all. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

knew that meant that the real attenuation was somewhere within their margin<br />

<strong>of</strong> error, which allowed loss between 4 and �4 decibels per kilometer.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y spent months analyzing the experiments, to make sure they had everything<br />

right, and to be sure their calculations did not yield negative loss (which<br />

would imply their measurements were wrong because the glass would have<br />

to generate light). In 1969 they finally reported loss <strong>of</strong> five decibels per kilometer,<br />

38 with the lower limit <strong>of</strong> their error margin close to zero. 39<br />

Difficult and elegant, those measurements opened the eyes <strong>of</strong> skeptics<br />

around the world. Before them, Kao had only a handful <strong>of</strong> believers because<br />

ultraclear glass existed only on paper. <strong>The</strong> measurements demonstrated he<br />

was right; extremely pure glass could be clearer than anyone else had imagined.<br />

‘‘Kao gave everybody a jolt,’’ recalls Dave Pearson <strong>of</strong> Bell Labs. ‘‘That<br />

was the first practical measurement which said, hey, you’re not just whistling<br />

Dixie.’’ 40<br />

<strong>The</strong> Search for Clear <strong>Fiber</strong>s<br />

<strong>The</strong> measurements were a milestone far from the finish line. <strong>The</strong>y showed<br />

that pure glass could be extremely clear; they did not show how to make<br />

ultratransparent optical fibers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!