02.11.2013 Views

TEchNOLOGy TRaNSFER MODEL - Javna agencija

TEchNOLOGy TRaNSFER MODEL - Javna agencija

TEchNOLOGy TRaNSFER MODEL - Javna agencija

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

KNOWLEDGE FOR BUSINESS IN BORDER REGIONS<br />

5.4.1 Technology Life Cycle Models<br />

Based upon the biological evolutionary model the technology life cycle model enables a systematic identification and observation<br />

of certain technological developments, thus allowing strategic planning of internal R&D. The concept of life cycle with its conventional<br />

phases of birth, adolescence, adulthood and old age and its premise of a limited length of life can be applied to different entities such<br />

as enterprises, industries and products but as well to technologies. Thus, the different maturity stages of a specific technology are the<br />

subject of analysis within the technology life cycle models.<br />

A technology life cycle can be visualized graphically by revealing the development of a certain technology over time, measured by<br />

means of specific performance variables (e.g. speed of microprocessors). In practice, most technological developments do not occur<br />

in a linear way, but are rather characterized by leaps and phases of stronger or shorter growth and stagnation. As a general rule, this<br />

usually results in an S-shaped course (see fig. 4).<br />

Examples originate from authors like A. D. Little as well as Ford and Ryan, which both directly integrate the time-factor by means<br />

of the abscissa. The technology life cycle model according to A. D. Little is explained in detail as follows.<br />

5.4.2 Technology Life Cycle Model according to A. D. Little<br />

This model particularly points to the correlation between the<br />

current position of a certain technology on its life cycle curve<br />

(maturity level) and its remaining competitive potential. On the<br />

basis of the technologies’ four phases of life (which are: Embryonic,<br />

Growth, Mature, Aging) an additional classification into<br />

three technology categories can be derived. The model of A. D.<br />

Little specifically provides us with several indicators which allow<br />

an easy determination of a technology’s present maturity stage<br />

(see fig. 4). With this typification, each technology can be quickly<br />

classified in terms of its remaining competitive potential.<br />

Figure 4: Phases of a technology life cycle in the concept acc. to A. D. Little (According to: Little, 1981; Tiefel, 2007)<br />

5.4.3 The S-curve concept according to McKinsey<br />

The S-curve concept according to McKinsey basically highlights the augmentation of a technology’s capability subject to cumulative<br />

R&D expenses and time. As can be seen in figure 5, the time-factor gets integrated into the model only indirectly via the cumulated<br />

R&D expenses.<br />

Let it be again noted, that a technology’s capability doesn’t usually increase in a linear way to the R&D expenses, but is rather<br />

S-shaped. Whereas in the early phase of a technology life cycle an increase in cumulative R&D expenses will only result in little performance<br />

improvements notably greater improvements can be expected in the subsequent boom-phase with the same R&D-effort.<br />

As figure 5 points out, technology converges a viability or performance limit over time, which means that R&D-efficiency decreases<br />

when approaching this limit. Thus, additional expenses lead to an ever shorter increase in capability.<br />

At the latest at this point a strategic decision is needed to determine whether the given R&D budget should still be invested in<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!