TEchNOLOGy TRaNSFER MODEL - Javna agencija

Recommendations

Info

1 Technology Transfer Model transfer partners seems to be of outstanding importance, as it contributes to both an intensification of transfer activities and to a reduction of transfer related barriers, obstacles and resistances. 1.8 Useful tip In the course of the previous section various barriers, obstacles and resistances as well as supporting factors in (technology) transfer processes between research institutions and companies have been discussed. The following figure illustrates a good-practice model for knowledge and technology transfer activities and is aimed at supporting technology transfer facilitators to successfully undertake transfer processes. Figure 14: Good-practice model for knowledge and technology transfer activities – implications for collaboration management (According to: Barnes et al., 2002) 1.9 References and further reading References: Arvanitis, S.; Kubli, U.; Sydow, N.; Wörter, M. (2005): Knowledge and Technology Transfer (KTT) Activities between Universities and Firms in Switzerland: The Main Facts. An Empirical Analysis Based on Firm-level Data, URL: http://ideas.repec.org/p/kof/wpskof/05- 115.html, as at 12.10.2009. Barnes, T.; Pashby, I.; Gibbons, A. (2002): Effective University-Industry Interaction: A Multi-case Evaluation of Collaborative R&D Projects, in: European Management Journal Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 272-285. Czarnitzki, D.; Licht, G.; Rammer, Ch.; Spielkamp, A. (2001): Rolle und Bedeutung von Intermediären im Wissens- und Technologietransfer, in: Ifo Schnelldienst Vol. 54 No. 4, S. 40-49. Eibel, D. (2008): Der Wissenstransfer zwischen Universitäten und Wirtschaft. Eine empirische Analyse an der Karl-Franzens-Universität, Masterarbeit KFU Graz. Kunz, W. H.; Mangold, M. (2004): Segmentierungsmodell für die Kundenintegration in Dienstleistungsinnovationsprozesse – eine Anreiz-Beitrags-theoretische Analyse, in: Bruhn/Strauss (2004), S. 327-358. Lockett, N. (2006): InfoLab21 Knowledge Transfer Study, Lancaster, 2006, URL: http://www.communitiesofinnovation.org/docs/ InfoLab21KTStudyFinal.pdf, as at 01.10.2009. Meier, C. (2010): Hemmende und fördernde Faktoren beim Wissenstransfer von Forschungseinrichtungen zu Unternehmen, Masterarbeit KFU Graz. 15
KNOWLEDGE FOR BUSINESS IN BORDER REGIONS Pfiffner, M.; Stadelmann, P. (1999): Wissen wirksam machen – wie Kopfarbeiter produktiv werden, 2. unveränderte Auflage, Bern 1999. Schartinger, D.; Schibany, A.; Gassler, H. (2001): Interactive Relations Between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria, in: Journal of Technology Transfer Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 255-268. Singer, V. (2009): Technologietransfer als Dienstleistung. Methodische Verankerung und instrumentelle Unterstützung, Masterarbeit KFU Graz. Thompson, R.: Stakeholder Analysis. Winning Support for your Projects, URL: http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newPPM_ 07.htm, as at 03.07.2010. Wright, M.; Clarysse, B.; Lockett, A.; Knockaert, M. (2008): Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries, in: Research Policy Vol. 37 No. 8, pp. 1205-1223. Further reading: Bruhn, M.; Strauss, B. (ed.) (2004): Dienstleistungsinnovationen – Forum Dienstleistungs-management, 1. Auflage, Wiesbaden 2004. Cummings, J. L.; Teng, B.-S. (2003): Transferring R&D knowledge: The key factors affecting knowledge transfer success, in: Journal of Engineering and Technology Management Vol. 20 No. 1-2, pp. 39-68. Fichtel, R. (1997): Technologietransfer für Klein- und Mittelbetriebe, Wiesbaden 1997. Friedman, A. L.; Miles, S. (2006): Stakeholders: Theory and Practice, Oxford 2006. Fritz, P.; Geist, P. (2009): Stakeholderanalyse, 2009, URL: http://www.hochleistungsorganisation.com/stakeholderanalyse.html, as at 03.07.2010. Hofer, F. (2007): The Improvement of Technology Transfer: An Analysis of Practices between Graz University of Technology and Styrian Companies, Wiesbaden 2007. Krogh, G.; Köhne, M. (1998): Der Wissenstransfer in Unternehmen: Phasen des Wissenstransfers und wichtige Einflussfaktoren, in: Die Unternehmung 52. Jg. Heft 5/6, S. 235-252. Markman, G. D.; Phan, P. H.; Balkin, D. B.; Gianiodis, P. T. (2005): Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer, in: Journal of Business Venturing Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 241-263. Mitchell, R. K.; Agle, B. R.; Wood, D. J. (1997): Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What really Counts, in: Academy of Management Review Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 853-888. Reinhard, M.; Schmalholz, H. (1996): Technologietransfer in Deutschland. Stand und Reformbedarf, Berlin/München 1996. Salmi, P.; Torkkeli, M. (2009): Success factors of interorganisational knowledge transfer: a case of a collaborative public-private R&D project, in: International Journal of Business Innovation and Research Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 109-125. Savage, G. T.; Nix, T. W.; Whitehead, B. (1991): Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders, in: Academy of Management Executive Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 61-75. Schartinger, D.; Rammer, Ch.; Fischer, M.; Fröhlich, J. (2002): Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants, in: Research Policy Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 303-328. Szulanski, G. (2000): The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol. 82 No. 1, pp. 9-27. Yih-Tong S. P.; Scott, J. (2005): An investigation of barriers to knowledge transfer, in: Journal of Knowledge Management Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 75-90. 16
Page 1 and 2: Spoštovani! Pred vami je priročni
Page 4 and 5: KAZALO VSEBINE Module 1: Technology
Page 6 and 7: 1 Technology Transfer Model to impr
Page 8 and 9: 1 Technology Transfer Model Survey
Page 10 and 11: 1 Technology Transfer Model Figure
Page 12 and 13: 1 Technology Transfer Model Challen
Page 14 and 15: 1 Technology Transfer Model specifi
Page 18 and 19: 1 Technology Transfer Model 1.10 He
Page 20 and 21: 2 BUSINESS MODELS „A business mod
Page 22 and 23: 2 BUSINESS MODELS 2.4.4 Customer In
Page 24 and 25: 2 BUSINESS MODELS • Market develo
Page 26 and 27: 2 BUSINESS MODELS Graph 7: The bala
Page 28 and 29: 2 BUSINESS MODELS 27
Page 30 and 31: 3 BUSINESS CULTURE universals, in w
Page 32 and 33: 3 BUSINESS CULTURE and doing their
Page 34 and 35: 3 BUSINESS CULTURE 3.5.3 Core value
Page 36 and 37: 3 BUSINESS CULTURE 3.8.1. Active li
Page 38 and 39: 3 BUSINESS CULTURE Raising question
Page 40 and 41: 3 BUSINESS CULTURE Why use it? The
Page 42 and 43: 3 BUSINESS CULTURE 3.9.3 Creative p
Page 44 and 45: 3 BUSINESS CULTURE II. REALIST/ PER
Page 46 and 47: 3 BUSINESS CULTURE • Toplak Ciril
Page 48 and 49: 4 Figure 1:Lewin’s phase model of
Page 50 and 51: 4 CHANGE PROCESS 4.5.2.3 Step 3: Cr
Page 52 and 53: 4 CHANGE PROCESS 4.5.3 Involvement
Page 54 and 55: 4 CHANGE PROCESS Then create a visi
Page 56 and 57: 5 Technology Management Figure 2: T
Page 58 and 59: 5 Technology Management the (now on
Page 60 and 61: 5 Technology Management nology port
Page 62 and 63: 5 Technology Management Technology
Page 64 and 65: 5 Technology Management Delphi Meth
Page 66 and 67:
5 Technology Management Figure 18:
Page 68 and 69:
5 Technology Management Dodgson, Ma
Page 70 and 71:
6 KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER Figure 2: Proc
Page 72 and 73:
6 KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER The empirical
Page 74 and 75:
6 KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER Figure 11: Inn
Page 76 and 77:
6 KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER The second pha
Page 78 and 79:
6 KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER In order to se
Page 80 and 81:
6 KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER tions of journ
Page 82 and 83:
7 Innovation und Technologietransfe
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
7 Financiranje in podporno okolje v
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
8 Učinkovito upravljanje intelektu
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
8 Immaterialgüterrecht (Österreic
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
9 Product and Service Dissemination
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154:
show all

TEchNOLOGy TRaNSFER MODEL - Javna agencija

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?