Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

128.32-34 128.31-33 166.26-28 120.33-34
Text in SZ:
“On the contrary, working out the concepts of being must be oriented in
accordance with these unavoidable phenomena.” 101
In the left margin:
N.B.
129.14-16 129.14-15 167.11-13 121.10-11
Text in SZ:
“The self of everyday Dasein is the Anyone-self, which we distinguish
from the authentic (i.e., properly apprehended) self.”
In the right margin, partially in cursive:
Anyone-self and authentic self
130.1-5 130.1-4 168.5-9 121.35-38
Text in SZ:
“Everyday Dasein draws the pre-ontological explication of its being from
the most immediate type of being, that of Anyone. Ontological interpretation
initially follows the lines of this explication: it understands Dasein in terms of the
world and takes Dasein as an innerwordly entity.”
In the left margin:
for the objection 102
130.12-13 130.12-13 168.18-19 122.1-4
Text in SZ:
“And so, by exhibiting this positive phenomenon S i.e., the most immediate
everyday being-in-a-world S we can gain an insight into why an ontological
interpretation of this state of being has been lacking.”
Husserl underlines:
“insight into why an ontological interpretation of this state of being has been
lacking.”
In the left margin:
?
101 Husserl underlines all of this, and much of the previous, sentence.
102 “Zum Einwand”