Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

Recommendations

Info

understanding-and-being-with-each-other, also gets taken as what
“But it is clear that this seemingly obvious consideration rests on shaky ground. The presupposition that this argument utilizes S namely, that Dasein’s being towards itself is its being towards someone else S does not hold up. Until this presupposition’s legitimacy is proven evident, it will remain a puzzle how Dasein’s relation to itself is supposed to be disclosed to the other as other.” Husserl glosses this text in four places: (a) Next to the second sentence, in the left margin: ? (b) Next to the second and third sentences, in the right margin: ? (c) In the second sentence he changes Heidegger’s “zu ihm selbst” [“towards itself”] to “zu sich selbst.” (d) Next to “it will remain a puzzle,” in the right margin: against the theory of empathy 125.17-19 125.16-18 163.1-3 117.33-35 Text in SZ: “But the fact that
Page 1 and 2:
HUSSERL’S MARGINAL NOTES TO HEIDE
Page 3 and 4:
1. PAGE AND LINE REFERENCES: Four p
Page 5 and 6:
gespannt (SZ 423.30-31): stretched
Page 7 and 8:
HUSSERL’S MARGINAL REMARKS in MAR
Page 9 and 10:
The cover and opening pages of SZ-1
Page 11 and 12:
The inside of the bookcover (front
Page 13 and 14:
The first inner page (flyleaf) / in
Page 15 and 16:
Title page / Haupttitelblatt A. Rec
Page 17 and 18:
TABLE OF CONTENTS viii.39 viii.38 9
Page 20 and 21:
INTRODUCTION EXPOSITION OF THE QUES
Page 22 and 23:
In the left margin: Are these, too,
Page 24 and 25:
10.17S11.2 10.18-11.3 30.22-31.12 8
Page 26 and 27:
11.17-19 11.18-20 31.25-27 9.27-31
Page 28:
existence 43 Husserl’s second not
Page 31 and 32: INTRODUCTION CHAPTER TWO The Twofol
Page 33 and 34: Text in SZ: “”[The analytic of
Page 35 and 36: adical posing of the question? 54 2
Page 37 and 38: 28.31-35 28.31-36 51.13-15 25.13-17
Page 39 and 40: is not the phenomenological concept
Page 41 and 42: Husserl underlines: “the being of
Page 43 and 44: PART ONE THE INTERPRETATION OF DASE
Page 45 and 46: “...an analysis of this entity is
Page 47 and 48: 47.10 47.10 73.7 44.20-23 Text in S
Page 49 and 50: “Mineness belongs to existent Das
Page 51 and 52: In the right margin, in cursive: co
Page 53: § 13 Being-in is Exemplified in a
Page 56 and 57: DIVISION ONE CHAPTER THREE The Worl
Page 58 and 59: 65.22-24 65.20-22 93.30-32 61.21-23
Page 60 and 61: “‘things’” In the right mar
Page 62 and 63: Text in SZ: “However, in a distur
Page 64 and 65: In the left margin: establishing a
Page 66 and 67: § 18 Involvement and Significance:
Page 68 and 69: B. The Contrast of Our Analysis of
Page 70 and 71: In the left margin: N.B. 98.38-40 9
Page 72 and 73: C. The Lived Spatiality of a Lived
Page 74: § 23 The Spatiality of Being-in-a-
Page 77 and 78: In the left margin, in cursive: Who
Page 79: In the right margin, the second in
Page 83 and 84: 128.32-34 128.31-33 166.26-28 120.3
Page 85 and 86: up in itself as being-in-a-world S
Page 87 and 88: asic-form of the co-original disclo
Page 89 and 90: § 30 Fear as a Mode of Disposition
Page 91 and 92: 146.1-4 146.1-4 186.6-9 137.1-4 Tex
Page 93 and 94: 150.24-26 150.22-25 191.21-24 141.8
Page 95 and 96: 161.13-14 161.13-14 204.8-9 151.2-3
Page 97 and 98: something and being cognitively in
Page 99 and 100: 195.25 195.25 240.6 182.22 Text in
Page 101 and 102: B. Reality as an Ontological Proble
Page 103 and 104: Text in SZ: “Of course, being
Page 105 and 106: succeeded in demonstrating that Das
Page 107 and 108: DIVISION TWO CHAPTER ONE The Possib
Page 109 and 110: “death’s certainty S that it is
Page 111 and 112: § 54 The Problem of How an Authent
Page 113 and 114: Husserl underlines ((SZ-1 271.39):
Page 115 and 116: 285.5-11 285.6-12 331.3-10 262.41S2
Page 117 and 118: N.B. 288.40S298.1 288.40S289.1 335.
Page 119 and 120: Husserl notes this passage above by
Page 121 and 122: 298.15-18 298.14-17 344.36-39 274.3
Page 123 and 124: § 61 A Preliminary Sketch of the M
Page 125 and 126: In the left margin, quite large: ?
Page 127 and 128: “One presupposes not too much but
Page 129 and 130: Text in SZ: “But why is it that K
Page 131 and 132:
In the right margin: N.B. 323.28-32
Page 133 and 134:
328.41S329.2 329.1-3 377.11-14 302.
Page 135 and 136:
DIVISION TWO CHAPTER FOUR Temporali
Page 137 and 138:
In the left margin: 262 154 337.6 3
Page 139 and 140:
Text in SZ: “Understanding is nev
Page 141 and 142:
345.8-11 345.8-11 395.25-28 317.2-5
Page 143 and 144:
349.25-29 349.25-29 400.36-40 320.3
Page 145 and 146:
354.17-20 354.16-19 405.24-28 324.3
Page 147 and 148:
Ontological genesis of the theoreti
Page 149 and 150:
epresentations.’” In the right
Page 151 and 152:
? 363.13-16 363.13-17 414.34-38 332
Page 153 and 154:
Text in SZ: “We call this
Page 155 and 156:
ekstatically occupied space, it is
Page 157 and 158:
constituted as an extending [Erstre
Page 159 and 160:
§ 73 The Ordinary Understanding of
Page 161 and 162:
thrown back onto its factical
Page 163 and 164:
387.14-17 387.13-16 439.12-15 353.4
Page 165 and 166:
present, and disappears.” In the
Page 167 and 168:
In the margin: Why [is] constitutiv
Page 169 and 170:
Within-time-ness and the Genesis of
Page 171 and 172:
425.1-4 424.35-37 477.12-14 389.10-
Page 173 and 174:
§ 82 The Contrast between the Exis
Page 175:
End of Husserl’s Marginalia to Se
show all

Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?