Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

Recommendations

Info

§ 10 Distinguishing the Analysis of Dasein from Anthropology, Psychology, and Biology 45.26-29 45.25-28 71.22-25 43.1-3 Text in SZ: “We have to show that, despite their material fruitfulness, all previous inquiries and investigations focused on Dasein have missed the authentic philosophical problem....” In the right margin: N.B. 46.1 46.1 71.39 43.16 Text in BT, underlined by Husserl: “cogito sum” In the left margin, in cursive: Descartes 46.3-15 46.3-15 71.39S72.12 43.18S43.35 Text in SZ: [From: “On the other hand, he leaves the sum entirely unexplained” to “a notable failure to see the need for inquiring about the being of the entities thus designated.”] In the left margin, in cursive: objections 47.2-5 47.2-4 73.1-3 44.15-18 Text in SZ: “But these limitations of Dilthey and Bergson are the common property of all the trends of “personalism” and all the tendencies towards philosophical anthropology that they have determined. Husserl underlines: “‘personalism” and “philosophical anthropology” In the right margin: objections 47.5-7 47.5-7 73.46 44.18-20 Text in SZ: “Even the fundamentally more radical and clear phenomenological interpretation of personality does not broach the question of Dasein’s being.” In the right margin: N.B.
47.10 47.10 73.7 44.20-23 Text in SZ: “Despite all their differences regarding questions, execution, and worldvieworientation, Husserl’s and Scheler’s interpretations of personality agree on what they are against.” Husserl underlines: “Husserl” Keyed to the word “Husserl” is the printed footnote number 1 at the bottom of the page; see the next entry. 47, note 1 47, note 1 489, note ii (H. 47) 400, note 2 Text in SZ: “The fundamental orientation of the problematic is already visible in the treatise “Philosophy as Rigorous Science,” Logos I (1910), p. 319.” 70 In the right margin: ? 48.23 48.23 74.5 45.15 Following the errata list (see above), Husserl corrects SZ by changing “verrechnet” to “errechnet” within the text. 49.26-33 49.25-32 75.9-14 46.16-23 Text in SZ: “In modern anthropology these two clues intertwine with the methodological startingpoint of the res cogitans, i.e., consciousness, or the matrix of lived experience. However, insofar as even cogitationes remain ontologically undefined, or are again taken tacitly and
Page 1 and 2: HUSSERL’S MARGINAL NOTES TO HEIDE
Page 3 and 4: 1. PAGE AND LINE REFERENCES: Four p
Page 5 and 6: gespannt (SZ 423.30-31): stretched
Page 7 and 8: HUSSERL’S MARGINAL REMARKS in MAR
Page 9 and 10: The cover and opening pages of SZ-1
Page 11 and 12: The inside of the bookcover (front
Page 13 and 14: The first inner page (flyleaf) / in
Page 15 and 16: Title page / Haupttitelblatt A. Rec
Page 17 and 18: TABLE OF CONTENTS viii.39 viii.38 9
Page 20 and 21: INTRODUCTION EXPOSITION OF THE QUES
Page 22 and 23: In the left margin: Are these, too,
Page 24 and 25: 10.17S11.2 10.18-11.3 30.22-31.12 8
Page 26 and 27: 11.17-19 11.18-20 31.25-27 9.27-31
Page 28: existence 43 Husserl’s second not
Page 31 and 32: INTRODUCTION CHAPTER TWO The Twofol
Page 33 and 34: Text in SZ: “”[The analytic of
Page 35 and 36: adical posing of the question? 54 2
Page 37 and 38: 28.31-35 28.31-36 51.13-15 25.13-17
Page 39 and 40: is not the phenomenological concept
Page 41 and 42: Husserl underlines: “the being of
Page 43 and 44: PART ONE THE INTERPRETATION OF DASE
Page 45: “...an analysis of this entity is
Page 49 and 50: “Mineness belongs to existent Das
Page 51 and 52: In the right margin, in cursive: co
Page 53: § 13 Being-in is Exemplified in a
Page 56 and 57: DIVISION ONE CHAPTER THREE The Worl
Page 58 and 59: 65.22-24 65.20-22 93.30-32 61.21-23
Page 60 and 61: “‘things’” In the right mar
Page 62 and 63: Text in SZ: “However, in a distur
Page 64 and 65: In the left margin: establishing a
Page 66 and 67: § 18 Involvement and Significance:
Page 68 and 69: B. The Contrast of Our Analysis of
Page 70 and 71: In the left margin: N.B. 98.38-40 9
Page 72 and 73: C. The Lived Spatiality of a Lived
Page 74: § 23 The Spatiality of Being-in-a-
Page 77 and 78: In the left margin, in cursive: Who
Page 79 and 80: In the right margin, the second in
Page 81 and 82: “But it is clear that this seemin
Page 83 and 84: 128.32-34 128.31-33 166.26-28 120.3
Page 85 and 86: up in itself as being-in-a-world S
Page 87 and 88: asic-form of the co-original disclo
Page 89 and 90: § 30 Fear as a Mode of Disposition
Page 91 and 92: 146.1-4 146.1-4 186.6-9 137.1-4 Tex
Page 93 and 94: 150.24-26 150.22-25 191.21-24 141.8
Page 95 and 96: 161.13-14 161.13-14 204.8-9 151.2-3
Page 97 and 98:
something and being cognitively in
Page 99 and 100:
195.25 195.25 240.6 182.22 Text in
Page 101 and 102:
B. Reality as an Ontological Proble
Page 103 and 104:
Text in SZ: “Of course, being
Page 105 and 106:
succeeded in demonstrating that Das
Page 107 and 108:
DIVISION TWO CHAPTER ONE The Possib
Page 109 and 110:
“death’s certainty S that it is
Page 111 and 112:
§ 54 The Problem of How an Authent
Page 113 and 114:
Husserl underlines ((SZ-1 271.39):
Page 115 and 116:
285.5-11 285.6-12 331.3-10 262.41S2
Page 117 and 118:
N.B. 288.40S298.1 288.40S289.1 335.
Page 119 and 120:
Husserl notes this passage above by
Page 121 and 122:
298.15-18 298.14-17 344.36-39 274.3
Page 123 and 124:
§ 61 A Preliminary Sketch of the M
Page 125 and 126:
In the left margin, quite large: ?
Page 127 and 128:
“One presupposes not too much but
Page 129 and 130:
Text in SZ: “But why is it that K
Page 131 and 132:
In the right margin: N.B. 323.28-32
Page 133 and 134:
328.41S329.2 329.1-3 377.11-14 302.
Page 135 and 136:
DIVISION TWO CHAPTER FOUR Temporali
Page 137 and 138:
In the left margin: 262 154 337.6 3
Page 139 and 140:
Text in SZ: “Understanding is nev
Page 141 and 142:
345.8-11 345.8-11 395.25-28 317.2-5
Page 143 and 144:
349.25-29 349.25-29 400.36-40 320.3
Page 145 and 146:
354.17-20 354.16-19 405.24-28 324.3
Page 147 and 148:
Ontological genesis of the theoreti
Page 149 and 150:
epresentations.’” In the right
Page 151 and 152:
? 363.13-16 363.13-17 414.34-38 332
Page 153 and 154:
Text in SZ: “We call this
Page 155 and 156:
ekstatically occupied space, it is
Page 157 and 158:
constituted as an extending [Erstre
Page 159 and 160:
§ 73 The Ordinary Understanding of
Page 161 and 162:
thrown back onto its factical
Page 163 and 164:
387.14-17 387.13-16 439.12-15 353.4
Page 165 and 166:
present, and disappears.” In the
Page 167 and 168:
In the margin: Why [is] constitutiv
Page 169 and 170:
Within-time-ness and the Genesis of
Page 171 and 172:
425.1-4 424.35-37 477.12-14 389.10-
Page 173 and 174:
§ 82 The Contrast between the Exis
Page 175:
End of Husserl’s Marginalia to Se
show all

Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?