Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

Text in SZ:
The note seems to refer to the text from SZ given immediately above, viz. SZ-1
10.22-27 = SZ-15 10.23-28 = BT-1 30.27-31 = BT-2 8.41-9.1.
In the bottom margin:
All regions of the sciences of the world are segments cut out of a real universum
of the world; the basic structure of the world is the relevant [sachliche] essence of
the world and thus is the what of “entities” [das Was des “Seienden”], which are a
universum of being S but specifically a universum of worldly entities. If by
“entity” we understand something-at-all in formal-ontological generality, then we
encounter the question: Is there an apodictic path leading from formal ontology to
a real [ontology]? There are no other concepts of “being” here, and thus [no other
concepts] of the structure of “being” either.
Husserl’s fourth note:
10.39S11.1 10.39-11.1 31.8-11 9.14-16
Text in SZ:
“Similarly the positive outcome of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason consists not in
a