Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

Recommendations

Info

10.17S11.2 10.18-11.3 30.22-31.12 8.36S9.17 Husserl’s next four notes all refer to the paragraph in SZ that runs (in the Macquarrie- Robinson translation) from “Basic concepts determine the way in which we get an understanding beforehand of the subject-matter...” to “His transcendental logic is an a priori logic for the subject-matter of that area of being called
Text in SZ: The note seems to refer to the text from SZ given immediately above, viz. SZ-1 10.22-27 = SZ-15 10.23-28 = BT-1 30.27-31 = BT-2 8.41-9.1. In the bottom margin: All regions of the sciences of the world are segments cut out of a real universum of the world; the basic structure of the world is the relevant [sachliche] essence of the world and thus is the what of “entities” [das Was des “Seienden”], which are a universum of being S but specifically a universum of worldly entities. If by “entity” we understand something-at-all in formal-ontological generality, then we encounter the question: Is there an apodictic path leading from formal ontology to a real [ontology]? There are no other concepts of “being” here, and thus [no other concepts] of the structure of “being” either. Husserl’s fourth note: 10.39S11.1 10.39-11.1 31.8-11 9.14-16 Text in SZ: “Similarly the positive outcome of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason consists not in a
Page 1 and 2: HUSSERL’S MARGINAL NOTES TO HEIDE
Page 3 and 4: 1. PAGE AND LINE REFERENCES: Four p
Page 5 and 6: gespannt (SZ 423.30-31): stretched
Page 7 and 8: HUSSERL’S MARGINAL REMARKS in MAR
Page 9 and 10: The cover and opening pages of SZ-1
Page 11 and 12: The inside of the bookcover (front
Page 13 and 14: The first inner page (flyleaf) / in
Page 15 and 16: Title page / Haupttitelblatt A. Rec
Page 17 and 18: TABLE OF CONTENTS viii.39 viii.38 9
Page 20 and 21: INTRODUCTION EXPOSITION OF THE QUES
Page 22 and 23: In the left margin: Are these, too,
Page 26 and 27: 11.17-19 11.18-20 31.25-27 9.27-31
Page 28: existence 43 Husserl’s second not
Page 31 and 32: INTRODUCTION CHAPTER TWO The Twofol
Page 33 and 34: Text in SZ: “”[The analytic of
Page 35 and 36: adical posing of the question? 54 2
Page 37 and 38: 28.31-35 28.31-36 51.13-15 25.13-17
Page 39 and 40: is not the phenomenological concept
Page 41 and 42: Husserl underlines: “the being of
Page 43 and 44: PART ONE THE INTERPRETATION OF DASE
Page 45 and 46: “...an analysis of this entity is
Page 47 and 48: 47.10 47.10 73.7 44.20-23 Text in S
Page 49 and 50: “Mineness belongs to existent Das
Page 51 and 52: In the right margin, in cursive: co
Page 53: § 13 Being-in is Exemplified in a
Page 56 and 57: DIVISION ONE CHAPTER THREE The Worl
Page 58 and 59: 65.22-24 65.20-22 93.30-32 61.21-23
Page 60 and 61: “‘things’” In the right mar
Page 62 and 63: Text in SZ: “However, in a distur
Page 64 and 65: In the left margin: establishing a
Page 66 and 67: § 18 Involvement and Significance:
Page 68 and 69: B. The Contrast of Our Analysis of
Page 70 and 71: In the left margin: N.B. 98.38-40 9
Page 72 and 73: C. The Lived Spatiality of a Lived
Page 74:
§ 23 The Spatiality of Being-in-a-
Page 77 and 78:
In the left margin, in cursive: Who
Page 79 and 80:
In the right margin, the second in
Page 81 and 82:
“But it is clear that this seemin
Page 83 and 84:
128.32-34 128.31-33 166.26-28 120.3
Page 85 and 86:
up in itself as being-in-a-world S
Page 87 and 88:
asic-form of the co-original disclo
Page 89 and 90:
§ 30 Fear as a Mode of Disposition
Page 91 and 92:
146.1-4 146.1-4 186.6-9 137.1-4 Tex
Page 93 and 94:
150.24-26 150.22-25 191.21-24 141.8
Page 95 and 96:
161.13-14 161.13-14 204.8-9 151.2-3
Page 97 and 98:
something and being cognitively in
Page 99 and 100:
195.25 195.25 240.6 182.22 Text in
Page 101 and 102:
B. Reality as an Ontological Proble
Page 103 and 104:
Text in SZ: “Of course, being
Page 105 and 106:
succeeded in demonstrating that Das
Page 107 and 108:
DIVISION TWO CHAPTER ONE The Possib
Page 109 and 110:
“death’s certainty S that it is
Page 111 and 112:
§ 54 The Problem of How an Authent
Page 113 and 114:
Husserl underlines ((SZ-1 271.39):
Page 115 and 116:
285.5-11 285.6-12 331.3-10 262.41S2
Page 117 and 118:
N.B. 288.40S298.1 288.40S289.1 335.
Page 119 and 120:
Husserl notes this passage above by
Page 121 and 122:
298.15-18 298.14-17 344.36-39 274.3
Page 123 and 124:
§ 61 A Preliminary Sketch of the M
Page 125 and 126:
In the left margin, quite large: ?
Page 127 and 128:
“One presupposes not too much but
Page 129 and 130:
Text in SZ: “But why is it that K
Page 131 and 132:
In the right margin: N.B. 323.28-32
Page 133 and 134:
328.41S329.2 329.1-3 377.11-14 302.
Page 135 and 136:
DIVISION TWO CHAPTER FOUR Temporali
Page 137 and 138:
In the left margin: 262 154 337.6 3
Page 139 and 140:
Text in SZ: “Understanding is nev
Page 141 and 142:
345.8-11 345.8-11 395.25-28 317.2-5
Page 143 and 144:
349.25-29 349.25-29 400.36-40 320.3
Page 145 and 146:
354.17-20 354.16-19 405.24-28 324.3
Page 147 and 148:
Ontological genesis of the theoreti
Page 149 and 150:
epresentations.’” In the right
Page 151 and 152:
? 363.13-16 363.13-17 414.34-38 332
Page 153 and 154:
Text in SZ: “We call this
Page 155 and 156:
ekstatically occupied space, it is
Page 157 and 158:
constituted as an extending [Erstre
Page 159 and 160:
§ 73 The Ordinary Understanding of
Page 161 and 162:
thrown back onto its factical
Page 163 and 164:
387.14-17 387.13-16 439.12-15 353.4
Page 165 and 166:
present, and disappears.” In the
Page 167 and 168:
In the margin: Why [is] constitutiv
Page 169 and 170:
Within-time-ness and the Genesis of
Page 171 and 172:
425.1-4 424.35-37 477.12-14 389.10-
Page 173 and 174:
§ 82 The Contrast between the Exis
Page 175:
End of Husserl’s Marginalia to Se
show all

Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?