Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

Husserl underlines:
“analogy”
Notes at the bottom of SZ-1 3:
Husserl’s first note:
Does the heterogenous have an analogy with the heterogenous?
Husserl’s second note:
All entities have in common with all [other] entities that without which entities as
such are not thinkable, and that is the formal ontological. The logical categories
are the formal modes of entities as such; every individual concrete entity is in
being [ist seiend] as a concretion of these forms.
§ 2
The Formal Structure of the Question of Being
5.36-37 5.35-36 25.13-15 4.23-25
Text in SZ:
“We do not even know the horizon in terms of which we are supposed to grasp
and fix the meaning [of being]. But this average and vague understanding of
being is still a fact.”
Husserl underlines:
“average and vague”
In the right margin:
?
6.26-29 6.26-29 26.8-11 4.42S5.1
Text in SZ:
“Accordingly, what we are asking about S the meaning of being S also requires
its own conceptuality which is essentially different from the concepts that
determine the meaning of entities.”
Husserl underlines:
“its own conceptuality”
In the left margin:
in formal generality, the formal-logical conceptuality
7.1-3 7.1-3 26.23-25 5.21-23
Text in SZ:
“Being consists in: the fact that something is; how something is; reality; thereness;
subsistence; validity; Dasein; the