02.11.2013 Views

Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

thrownness<br />

384.6-7 384.6-7 435.27-29 351.25-26<br />

Text in SZ:<br />

“Only being free for de<strong>at</strong>h gives Dasein its goal outright <strong>and</strong> pushes existence in<strong>to</strong><br />

its finitude.”<br />

In the left margin:<br />

finitude<br />

384.7-11 384.7-11 435.29-33 351.26-29<br />

Text in SZ:<br />

“When grasped, the finitude of existence pulls Dasein back from the endless array<br />

of readily available possibilities S comfortableness, sloughing off, taking m<strong>at</strong>ters<br />

lightly S <strong>and</strong> delivers Dasein in<strong>to</strong> the simplicity of its f<strong>at</strong>e.”<br />

In the left margin, in cursive:<br />

f<strong>at</strong>e cf. 386 186<br />

384.11-14 384.11-14 435.33-36 351.29-32<br />

Text in SZ:<br />

“[By the word “f<strong>at</strong>e”] we design<strong>at</strong>e Dasein’s original being-his<strong>to</strong>rical, which lies<br />

in authentic resolution <strong>and</strong> in which Dasein frees itself for itself S free for de<strong>at</strong>h S<br />

in a possibility th<strong>at</strong> it has both inherited <strong>and</strong> chosen.”<br />

In the left margin:<br />

N.B. 187<br />

384.30-36 384.30-35 436.14-20 352.2-7<br />

Text in SZ:<br />

“But if f<strong>at</strong>eful Dasein, as being-in-a-world, exists essentially in being-with others,<br />

its being-his<strong>to</strong>rical is a co-being-his<strong>to</strong>rical, <strong>and</strong> is determin<strong>at</strong>ive for it as shared<br />

f<strong>at</strong>e [Geschick]. This is how we design<strong>at</strong>e the being-his<strong>to</strong>rical of the community,<br />

of a people. Shared f<strong>at</strong>e is not cobbled <strong>to</strong>gether out of individual f<strong>at</strong>es, any more<br />

than being-with-each-other can be unders<strong>to</strong>od as the coming <strong>to</strong>gether of several<br />

subjects.”<br />

In the left margin, partly in cursive:<br />

shared f<strong>at</strong>e ([of the] community) <strong>and</strong> f<strong>at</strong>e (of the individual)<br />

385.11-14 385.11-13 437.6-8 352.19-24<br />

Text in SZ (all in italics):<br />

“Only an entity whose very being is essentially becoming, such th<strong>at</strong> it can be<br />

186 Husserl’s reference is <strong>to</strong> SZ-1 386.28-29. SZ-15 386.27-28, BT-1 438.22-23 = BT-2 353.20-21.<br />

See also the following footnote.<br />

187 This mark appears so close <strong>to</strong> the previous one th<strong>at</strong> the two may well be meant as a single<br />

marginal note.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!