Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

Husserl underlines:
“mathematical” and “a priori”
In the left margin:
= quantitative
362.32-41 362.33-363.3 414.12-22 332.2-9
Text in SZ:
“[The paradigmatic character of mathematical natural science] consists, rather, in
the fact that, in it, the thematic entities are discovered in the only way entities can
be discovered: in a prior projection of their being-structure. By working out, in
basic concepts, the guiding understanding of being, we also determine the clues of
[the science’s] methods, the structure of its way of conceiving things, the
possibility of truth and certainty that belongs to it, the ways things get grounded or
proven, the mode in which it is binding for us, and the way it is communicated.
The totality of these items constitutes the full existential conception of science.”
In the left margin:
But how does this take place? Whence do we know this?
363.3-6 363.4-7 414.24-27 332.10-13
Text in SZ:
“The scientific projection of whatever entities we have already
encountered lets us explicitly understand their kind of being, such that the
possible forms of a pure discovering of innerworldly entities becomes manifest.”
Husserl underlines:
“scientific projection”
In the right margin:
But we must first have it, we must first ground it S not, however, through such
vague generalities [as those] of Heidegger.
363.6-10 363.7-10 414.27-32 332.13-16
Text in SZ:
“The whole of this projecting S which includes the articulation of the
understanding of being, the consequent delimiting of the subject-area, and the
delineation of the concepts suitable to these entities S is what we call
thematizing.”
In the right margin:
“thematizing”
363.10-12 363.10-13 414.32-34 332.16-19
Text in SZ:
“[Thematizing] aims at freeing up the entities met within-a-world, in such a way
that they are