Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

Recommendations

Info

Half-title page / Erstes Titelblatt [Schmutztitel] A. Recto / Vorderseite (p. i) 30 [The half-title page reads: “Sein und Zeit / Erste Hälfte.” Under that Husserl writes in cursive: amicus Plato magis amica veritas 31 B. Verso / Rückseite (p. ii) [This side is blank.] 30 This half-title page is found in SZ-1, but not in SZ-15. (BT-1 has a half-title page (the unnumbered page 1) with only one line: “BEING AND TIME.” 31 (“Plato is a friend, truth a greater friend.”) The Latin phrase (spoken as if by Aristotle) condenses the statement in Nicomachean Ethics (A, 6, 1096 a 14-17): “Perhaps it would seem to be better S and, what is more, a duty S to destroy even what is closest to us for the sake of saving the truth, especially since we are lovers-of-wisdom; for while both are dear to us, it is a matter of divine ordinance to prefer the truth.” However, the provenance of the Latin phrase is complex: [A] The Platonic dictum: The anonymous Liber de vita et genere Aristotilis records a similar statement allegedly made by Plato about Socrates: “et alibi dicit [Plato] ‘Amicus quidem Socrates, sed magis amica veritas.’” (In Ingemar Düring, Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition, Studia Graeca et Latina Gothburgensia, vol. 5, Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet, 1957, p. 154 [28].) The Liber de vita itself is a late twelfth-century translation of one of the many Greek lives of Aristotle (ΓΕΝΟG ΑΡΙGΤΟΤΕΛΟΥG) in circulation at that time, not unlike, for example, the Greek Vita vulgata (cf. its nίλος µ¥ν Σωikάτης, •λλ µλλον nιλτάτη º •λήhgια, Düring, p. 132 [9]; cf. also the Greek Vita marciana, (ibid., pp. 101-102 [28]). [B] The Aristotelian dictum: Thomas Aquinas repeated the Platonic dictum of the Liber de Vita (as above) in his commentary on the above passage from Nicomachean Ethics (In decem libros ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum expositio, ed. Raimondo M. Spiazzi, Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1949, lectio VI, no. 78, p. 21). Aometime thereafter the Latin of the Platonic dictum was changed into the Latin of the Aristotelian dictum that Husserl inscribed in his copy of SZ.
Title page / Haupttitelblatt A. Recto / Vorderseite (p. iii) 32 [In the upper left-hand corner, Husserl’s cataloguing mark again:] D-7 [The title page contains a misprint.] “Band VII” should read “Band VIII.” In the lower right corner, there is a stamp, with the “No.” left blank:] “EX LIBRIS - Edmund HUSSERL SNo............ B. Verso / Rüchseite (p. iv) [No marks by Husserl.] 32 Printed on the full-title page of SZ-1 is: Sein und Zeit / von Martin Heidegger / Marburg a. L. / Erste Hälfte /Sonderdruck aus: “Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung”, Band VII [sic] / herausgegeben von E. Husserl S Freiburg i. B. / Max Niemeyer, Verlag, Halle a. d. S. 1927.
Page 1 and 2: HUSSERL’S MARGINAL NOTES TO HEIDE
Page 3 and 4: 1. PAGE AND LINE REFERENCES: Four p
Page 5 and 6: gespannt (SZ 423.30-31): stretched
Page 7 and 8: HUSSERL’S MARGINAL REMARKS in MAR
Page 9 and 10: The cover and opening pages of SZ-1
Page 11 and 12: The inside of the bookcover (front
Page 13: The first inner page (flyleaf) / in
Page 17 and 18: TABLE OF CONTENTS viii.39 viii.38 9
Page 20 and 21: INTRODUCTION EXPOSITION OF THE QUES
Page 22 and 23: In the left margin: Are these, too,
Page 24 and 25: 10.17S11.2 10.18-11.3 30.22-31.12 8
Page 26 and 27: 11.17-19 11.18-20 31.25-27 9.27-31
Page 28: existence 43 Husserl’s second not
Page 31 and 32: INTRODUCTION CHAPTER TWO The Twofol
Page 33 and 34: Text in SZ: “”[The analytic of
Page 35 and 36: adical posing of the question? 54 2
Page 37 and 38: 28.31-35 28.31-36 51.13-15 25.13-17
Page 39 and 40: is not the phenomenological concept
Page 41 and 42: Husserl underlines: “the being of
Page 43 and 44: PART ONE THE INTERPRETATION OF DASE
Page 45 and 46: “...an analysis of this entity is
Page 47 and 48: 47.10 47.10 73.7 44.20-23 Text in S
Page 49 and 50: “Mineness belongs to existent Das
Page 51 and 52: In the right margin, in cursive: co
Page 53: § 13 Being-in is Exemplified in a
Page 56 and 57: DIVISION ONE CHAPTER THREE The Worl
Page 58 and 59: 65.22-24 65.20-22 93.30-32 61.21-23
Page 60 and 61: “‘things’” In the right mar
Page 62 and 63: Text in SZ: “However, in a distur
Page 64 and 65:
In the left margin: establishing a
Page 66 and 67:
§ 18 Involvement and Significance:
Page 68 and 69:
B. The Contrast of Our Analysis of
Page 70 and 71:
In the left margin: N.B. 98.38-40 9
Page 72 and 73:
C. The Lived Spatiality of a Lived
Page 74:
§ 23 The Spatiality of Being-in-a-
Page 77 and 78:
In the left margin, in cursive: Who
Page 79 and 80:
In the right margin, the second in
Page 81 and 82:
“But it is clear that this seemin
Page 83 and 84:
128.32-34 128.31-33 166.26-28 120.3
Page 85 and 86:
up in itself as being-in-a-world S
Page 87 and 88:
asic-form of the co-original disclo
Page 89 and 90:
§ 30 Fear as a Mode of Disposition
Page 91 and 92:
146.1-4 146.1-4 186.6-9 137.1-4 Tex
Page 93 and 94:
150.24-26 150.22-25 191.21-24 141.8
Page 95 and 96:
161.13-14 161.13-14 204.8-9 151.2-3
Page 97 and 98:
something and being cognitively in
Page 99 and 100:
195.25 195.25 240.6 182.22 Text in
Page 101 and 102:
B. Reality as an Ontological Proble
Page 103 and 104:
Text in SZ: “Of course, being
Page 105 and 106:
succeeded in demonstrating that Das
Page 107 and 108:
DIVISION TWO CHAPTER ONE The Possib
Page 109 and 110:
“death’s certainty S that it is
Page 111 and 112:
§ 54 The Problem of How an Authent
Page 113 and 114:
Husserl underlines ((SZ-1 271.39):
Page 115 and 116:
285.5-11 285.6-12 331.3-10 262.41S2
Page 117 and 118:
N.B. 288.40S298.1 288.40S289.1 335.
Page 119 and 120:
Husserl notes this passage above by
Page 121 and 122:
298.15-18 298.14-17 344.36-39 274.3
Page 123 and 124:
§ 61 A Preliminary Sketch of the M
Page 125 and 126:
In the left margin, quite large: ?
Page 127 and 128:
“One presupposes not too much but
Page 129 and 130:
Text in SZ: “But why is it that K
Page 131 and 132:
In the right margin: N.B. 323.28-32
Page 133 and 134:
328.41S329.2 329.1-3 377.11-14 302.
Page 135 and 136:
DIVISION TWO CHAPTER FOUR Temporali
Page 137 and 138:
In the left margin: 262 154 337.6 3
Page 139 and 140:
Text in SZ: “Understanding is nev
Page 141 and 142:
345.8-11 345.8-11 395.25-28 317.2-5
Page 143 and 144:
349.25-29 349.25-29 400.36-40 320.3
Page 145 and 146:
354.17-20 354.16-19 405.24-28 324.3
Page 147 and 148:
Ontological genesis of the theoreti
Page 149 and 150:
epresentations.’” In the right
Page 151 and 152:
? 363.13-16 363.13-17 414.34-38 332
Page 153 and 154:
Text in SZ: “We call this
Page 155 and 156:
ekstatically occupied space, it is
Page 157 and 158:
constituted as an extending [Erstre
Page 159 and 160:
§ 73 The Ordinary Understanding of
Page 161 and 162:
thrown back onto its factical
Page 163 and 164:
387.14-17 387.13-16 439.12-15 353.4
Page 165 and 166:
present, and disappears.” In the
Page 167 and 168:
In the margin: Why [is] constitutiv
Page 169 and 170:
Within-time-ness and the Genesis of
Page 171 and 172:
425.1-4 424.35-37 477.12-14 389.10-
Page 173 and 174:
§ 82 The Contrast between the Exis
Page 175:
End of Husserl’s Marginalia to Se
show all

Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?