Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

Husserl notes this passage above by writing “[p.] 294] on the book’s front endpaper.
The Existential Structure of the Authentic
Ability-to-be that is Evidenced
in Conscience
§ 60
295.27-32 295.25-30 342.5-10 272.21-26
Text in SZ:
“[Wanting-to-have-a-conscience means] letting one’s ownmost self act upon itself
from out of itself qua being-guilty; phenomenally speaking, this is Dasein’s
authentic ability-to-be evidencing itself in Dasein. We now have to lay out its
existential structure. This is the only way to get to the basic structure of the
authenticity of Dasein’s existence as disclosed in Dasein itself.”
In the left margin:
N.B.
296.2-5 296.2-5 342.22-24 272.37-39
Text in SZ:
“The fact of the dread of conscience gives us phenomenal confirmation that in
understanding the call Dasein is brought face to face with its own uncanniness.”
In the left margin:
?
297.1-3 297.1-2 343.20-21 273.31-32
Text in SZ:
“...the silent ready-for-dread self-projection in terms of one’s ownmost beingguilty
is what we call “resolution”.
After the word “resolution,” within the text:
(authentic), see below 137
In the top margin, just above this text:
Is “resolution,” in the natural meaning of the word, [the same as] decision?
297.4-6 297.3-5 343.22-24 273.33-35
Text in SZ:
“Resolution is a distinctive mode of Dasein’s disclosedness. But in an
137 Husserl’s gloss “authentic” presumably applies to “disclosedness” (“authentic resoluteness” is
a pleonasm). The phrase “see below” presumably refers to SZ-1 297.35-38 = SZ-15 297.33-36 =
BT-1 344.16-19 = BT-2 274.19-21, where Heidegger declares authentic disclosedness to be a
modification of discoveredness and of the disclosedness of co-Dasein.