Marginalia to Being and Time - Religious Studies at Stanford ...

§ 54
The Problem of How
an Authentic Existentiel Possibility Evidences Itself
268.1-5 268.1-5 312.21-25 247.18S248.3
Text in SZ:
“[Dasein’s] lostness in the Anyone entails that decisions have always
already been made about Dasein’s most immediate factical abilities-to-be (i.e.,
about the tasks, rules, and standards, the urgency and extent, of being-in-a-world
qua concern and concern-for-others). Grasping these being-possibilities has
always already been preempted from Dasein by Anyone.”
In the left margin:
Obviously that holds for the “tradition.”
268.14-17 268.13-16 313.1-4 248.10-13
Text in SZ:
“Pulling oneself back from Anyone S i.e., existentielly modifying the Anyone-self
into authentic selfhood S must be carried out as the retrieval of a choice.”
Husserl underlines:
“retrieval of a choice.”
In the left margin:
What kind of choice?
268.17-20 268.16-19 313.5-8 248.13-17
Text in SZ:
“Retrieving a choice means making that choice, deciding for an ability-to-be in
terms of one’s own self. In making the choice, Dasein first makes possible for
itself its authentic ability-to-be.”
Husserl underlines:
“in terms of one’s own self”
In the left margin:
This can take place even in the Anyone. But precisely one’s “own self” is in
question.
I would place the problem of justification in the forefront. 127
269.2-4 269.2-4 313.28-29 248.37-39
Text in SZ:
“The ontological analysis of conscience on which we are thus embarking lies prior
to any description and classification of experiences of conscience....”
In the right margin:
N.B.
127 This last sentence might be meant to apply to the following paragraph in SZ.